1 |
Die lewe in die Suid-Afrikaanse boerekrygsgevangekampe tydens die Anglo-Boereoorlog, 1899-1902Changuion, Louis Annis. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (M.A. (Cultural History))--University of Pretoria, 2000. / Text in Afrikaans. Summary in English and Afrikaans. Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
A woman's world at a time of war : an analysis of selected women's diaries during the Anglo-Boer War 1899-1902 /Ross, Helen M. January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.
|
3 |
The Cape rebel of the South African War, 1899-1902 /Shearing, Taffy. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (DPhil)--University of Stellenbosch, 2004. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.
|
4 |
"You cannot sever the jaw-bones from the head"Mohlamme, Jacob Saul. January 1979 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 79-91).
|
5 |
D Battery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery, in the South African War,1900Benoit, Edward, 1971- January 1997 (has links)
Canadian military historians have overlooked the role of the Canadian artillery in the South African War of 1899-1902, This thesis is an attempt to fill that gap in the historiography, Based largely on primary sources such as newspaper reports, military records, and personal diaries and letters, the thesis examines the contributions and experiences of D battery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery, in South African War. It asserts that the battery played a variety of roles, ranging from the monotonous line of communication duty to intense combat actions, and that the soldiers reacted to this varied experience in different ways.
|
6 |
D Battery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery, in the South African War,1900Benoit, Edward, 1971- January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The Cape Rebel of the South African War, 1899-1902Shearing, Hilary Anne 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (DPhil (History))—University of Stellenbosch, 2005. / This dissertation investigates the role of a group of Cape colonists who rose in rebellion against
the colonial government and allied themselves to the Boer Republics during the South African War of
1899-1902.
The decision of the Griqualand West colonists to join the Republican forces took place against a
background of severe deprivation in the agricultural sector due to the losses sustained in the rinderpest
pandemic of 1896/1897. It also coincided with the invasion of Griqualand West by Transvaal forces. The
failure of the Schreiner Government to defend its borders encouraged rebellion, as there were no armed
forces to oppose either the invasion or the rebellion.
While some of the Cape rebels fought on the side of the Republicans during major battles along
the Modder River, others were commandeered to gather and transport supplies to the laagers. Four months
after the surrender of Gen P Cronje at Paardeberg the majority of these rebels had laid down arms except
for those under Gen Piet de Villiers who fought on in the Transvaal. After a second rebellion in 1901, far
fewer rebels fought a war of attrition north of the Orange River; eventually about 700 men leaving the
Cape Colony to avoid laying down arms.
South of the Orange River Free State forces commandeered the disaffected colonists of the
Stormberg and Colesberg regions in November 1899. Because the Republicans had not occupied these
regions earlier in the war, British reinforcements and the Colonial Division took to the field against them
almost immediately. The victory gained at Stormberg in December 1899 by the Boer forces was not
followed up. Olivier failed to integrate his forces; unlike those at Colesberg where the Boers were far
better led and scored some notable successes. The Republican burghers withdrew from the Cape Colony
in March 1901, which in turn led to a mass surrender ofrebels. Those that were captured under arms were
sent as POWs to Ceylon and India, while those that surrendered were held in colonial gaols until they
were bailed or given passes. Only a few hundred continued to wage war in the Boer Republics for the
remainder of 1900.
The second invasion by Free State forces into the Cape Colony consisted of mobile commandos
that criss-crossed the interior. For the first few months they sowed havoc, but after June 1901 the military
used mass tactics against those who were forced into the isolated northwest Cape. In 1902, unknown to
them, the Boer republics signed the Treaty of Vereeniging and ceased to exist as sovereign states. The
Cape rebels were not signatories to the treaty. According to an agreement between the Boer leaders and the Colonial Office, if a rebel surrendered and pleaded guilty to High Treason under Proclamation 100 of
1902 he would receive a partial amnesty and be disfranchised. However rebel officers were charged in
court and fines and prison sentences would be handed down.
After the first invasion rebels who were captured or surrendered were tried under the Indemnity
and Special Tribunals Act that was in force for six months until April 1901. Martial Law was then again in
vogue from 22 April until Peace at the end of May 1902, and under this act 44 Cape colonists,
Republicans and aliens were executed, and hundreds .of others, whose death sentences were commuted to
penal servitude for life, were shipped to POW camps on Bermuda and St Helena. The surrenders 00,442
rebels were accepted under Proclamation 100 of 1902. Rebel officers or those facing serious charges were
tried under the Indemnity and Special Tribunals Act in Special High Treason Courts. The general amnesty
announced in 1905 brought to an end the prosecutions for High Treason ofCape rebels. In 1906 the names
of disfranchised colonists were. replaced on the Voters' Roll.
The final official return of Cape rebels for 1903 is 12,205 or 0.5% of the total population, while
the return according to the database is 16,198 rebels or 0.7%. Strategically the rebellions played a limited
role in the overall Republican war effort despite the individual rebel's self-sacrifice to the cause. However,
although small in numbers, the rebellion had an enormous impact on colonial life (especially in 1901) as it
led to a thinly disguised civil war and enmity between the Afrikaner and English colonists, which took
years to disappear.
|
8 |
A woman's world at a time of war : an analysis of selected women's diaries during the Anglo-Boer War 1899-1902Ross, Helen M. 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA (History))--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / In the case of the Anglo-Boer War masculine military history has attracted scholars, as has the suffering and martyrdom of female internees in the concentration camps. Conspicuously overlooked by scholars are the wartime plights of black women and privileged white women.
The focus of this study are those white females who remained outside of the camps. Some such women staked their claim to history by keeping diaries of their wartime experiences. Two in particular, Isabella Lipp and Nonnie De la Rey, chronicled opposing sides of the conflict. Their testimony is studied here both descriptively and comparatively.
Because the challenges of war provoked differing responses, adjunct to Nonnie and Isabella’s journals are the diaries of Alida Badenhorst, Elizabeth Henrietta Martyn (Bessie) Collins and the unpublished notes of Florence Burgers—daughter of the Transvaal’s second president. All these women were privileged and hence advantaged but they also struggled daily for survival and responded proactively.
Mrs. Isabella Lipp, wife of a prominent banker, recorded her perception of the war from a cramped third-floor apartment in Johannesburg. Very much in tune with the ideological aspects of war, she wanted imperialism upheld even amidst the unfair cruelty that she witnessed.
Nonnie De la Rey, wife of General Koos De la Rey, fled the enemy and lived on the open veld. Her life was not as monotonous or lonely as Isabella’s. Had the consequences been less decisive this may have been an exciting adventure.
What emerges from these sources, which are representative of white women of society, is a surprising female response to wartime conditions. That response included the sadness, struggle and toil that might be expected, but, significantly, it also included remarkable resilience—manifested in a variety of ways in the face of momentous circumstances.
The forgoing findings contribute to the war’s social/gender history by including “people without history” within the written historical record.1 Women displayed a unique reliance and bond between themselves and their black workers; domestic duties and roles were completely disrupted; and the constant anxiety and lack of news about loved ones caused acute family distress.
Did women snivel submissively, waiting to be rescued by men? Were they victims of circumstances thrust upon them? Did they succumb to the Victorian model of female fragility? My findings offer evidence to the contrary.
|
9 |
American diplomacy and the Boer warFerguson, John Henry, January 1939 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1937. / Published also without thesis note. Bibliography: p. 222-229.
|
10 |
Nonnie de la Rey 1856-1923Rowan, Zelda. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (MHCS(Kultuurgeskiedenis)--Universiteit van Pretoria, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
Page generated in 0.0925 seconds