Yes / Cells encapsulation is a micro-technology widely applied in cell and tissue research, tissue transplantation, and regenerative medicine. In this paper, we proposed a growth of microtissue model for the human keratinocytes (HaCaT) cell line and an oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell line (ORL-48) based on a simple aerosol microencapsulation technique. At an extrusion rate of 20 μL/min and air flow rate of 0.3 L/min programmed in the aerosol system, HaCaT and ORL-48 cells in alginate microcapsules were encapsulated in microcapsules with a diameter ranging from 200 to 300 μm. Both cell lines were successfully grown into microtissues in the microcapsules of alginate within 16 days of culture. The microtissues were characterized by using a live/dead cell viability assay, field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), fluorescence staining, and cell re-plating experiments. The microtissues of both cell types were viable after being extracted from the alginate membrane using alginate lyase. However, the microtissues of HaCaT and ORL-48 demonstrated differences in both nucleus size and morphology. The microtissues with re-associated cells in spheroids are potentially useful as a cell model for pharmacological studies. / Malaysia Ministry of Education (Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, FRGS Vot. 1482 and IGSP Vot. 679).

Yes / Background - Previous studies have demonstrated that a number of HOX genes, a family of transcription factors with key roles in early development, are up-regulated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and other cancers. The loci of several Homeobox (HOX) genes also contain microRNAs (miRs), including miR-196a. Methods - Global miR expression and expression of all 39 HOX genes in normal oral keratinocytes (NOKs), oral pre-malignant (OPM) and HNSCC cells was assessed by expression microarray and qPCR and in tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qPCR of laser microdissected (LCM) tissues. Expression of miR196a and HOXB9 was reduced using anti-miR-196a and siRNA, respectively. Expression microarray profiles of anti-miR196a and pre-miR196a transfected cells were compared to parental cells in order to identify novel targets of miR- 196a. Putative miR196a targets were validated by qPCR and were confirmed as binding to the 3’UTR of miR196a by a dual luciferase reporter assay combined with mutational analysis of the miR-196a binding site. Results - miR-196a and HOXB9 are highly expressed in HNSCC compared to NOKs, a pattern also seen in HNSCC tissues by HOXB9 IHC and qPCR of miR-196a in LCM tissue. Knock-down of miR-196a expression decreased HNSCC cell migration, invasion and adhesion to fibronectin, but had no effect on proliferation. Furthermore, knock-down of HOXB9 expression decreased migration, invasion and proliferation but did not alter adhesion. We identified a novel primary mRNA transcript containing HOXB9 and miR196a-1 as predicted from in-silico analysis. Expression array analysis identified a number of miR196a targets, including MAMDC2 and HOXC8. We confirmed that MAMDC2 is a novel miR-196a target using a dual luciferase reporter assay with the effect abolished on mutation of the binding site. Conclusions - These results show that miR-196a and HOXB9 are overexpressed, perhaps co-ordinately, as HNSCC develops and exert a pro-tumourigenic phenotype in HNSCC and OPM cells.

Yu, Le. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-198). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in English and Chinese.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Univ., 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2002. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2003. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine, 1999. / Bibliography: leaves 118-138.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Umeå : Umeå universitet, 2010.

INTRODUÇÃO: A ressecção do ramo ascendente da mandíbula foi, durante várias décadas, considerada o tratamento de eleição para os tumores da loja amigdalina e região retromolar, independente do grau de acometimento do osso mandibular, ocasionando um déficit funcional e estético considerável, muitas vezes, com prejuízos irreparáveis à qualidade de vida, às vezes desnecessário. Assim, a ressecção marginal do osso mandibular surgiu como uma alternativa de tratamento viável, uma vez que a manutenção de um segmento do ramo mandibular, em lesões sem comprometimento ósseo, não aumenta os índices de recidiva, tampouco compromete os princípios de radicalidade oncológica. OBJETIVO E MÉTODOS: Por meio de estudo retrospectivo de Outubro de 1994 a Dezembro de 2001, foram comparados 42 pacientes portadores de tumores avançados de região retromolar e loja amigdalina, sendo 20 deles submetidos a ressecção marginal do osso mandibular e 22 submetidos a ressecção do ramo ascendente da mandíbula, em relação a complicações, seqüela de procedimentos, recidiva locorregional e sobrevida. RESULTADOS: Dos 20 pacientes tratados com mandibulectomia marginal, avaliados por um período de 9 a 60 meses, sete (35%) pacientes morreram com doença, com sobrevida mínima de 09 meses, 3 por recidiva local, 3 por recidiva regional e 1 por recidiva locorregional. Um paciente morreu no pós-operatório imediato. Na avaliação da peça cirúrgica encontramos todas as margens livres, considerada exígua em profundidade em dois pacientes, um deles falecido por recidiva local. Houve disseminação linfonodal em 15 pacientes sendo com ruptura extracapsular em 4, encontrada em 2 pacientes com recidiva regional. O controle locorregional foi obtido em 63% dos pacientes. Dos 22 pacientes tratados com ressecção segmentar do osso mandibular, com intervalo de seguimento de 14 a 60 meses, 8 (36,4%) morreram pela doença, com sobrevida mínima de 9 meses, 5 por recidiva local e 3 por recidiva à distância. Um paciente morreu no pós-operatório imediato. As margens foram livres em 20 pacientes e, em 3 exíguas, um deles falecido por recidiva local. Houve disseminação linfonodal em 12 pacientes com ruptura extracapsular em 7 pacientes. O controle locorregional foi obtido em 61% dos pacientes. Na curva de análise de sobrevida, pelo método de Kaplan-Meier, o grupo tratado com mandibulectomia marginal apresentou uma taxa de 42%, com intervalo de 31 a 52 meses, erro padrão de 5 meses e intervalo de confiança de 95% e o grupo tratado com ressecção segmentar 38% com intervalo de 27 a 48 meses, erro padrão de 5 meses, um intervalo de confiança de 95%. A comparação pelo teste de Log Rank, não paramétrico apresentou p<0,8329 e pelo teste t-Student p< 0,621 ambos não significantes. As principais complicações foram a infecção local em 5 (11,9%) pacientes e a fístula orocutânea em 4 (9,5%). Houve uma fratura da placa de titânio, dois pacientes evoluíram com osteorradionecrose e nove com disfunção da articulação têmporo-mandibular. CONCLUSÕES: Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos de ressecção marginal e segmentar nos critérios analisados. Portanto, a conservação do ramo ascendente da mandíbula, em lesões que não apresentem envolvimento mandibular, mesmo avançadas, não aumenta o índice de recidiva. / INTRODUCTION: For several decades, resection of the ascending ramus of the mandible was considered to be mandatory for the treatment of tonsil and retromolar trigone tumours, independent from the damage degree of the mandibular bone, causing considerable functional and aesthetic deficit, many times with irreparable quality of life loss, sometimes unnecessary. Thus, marginal resection of the mandibular bone appeared as a feasible alternative treatment, since maintaining a segment of the mandibular ramus in lesions without bone involvement did not increase the recurrence indexes or compromise the principles of oncological radicalness. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Through a retrospective study from October 1994 to December 2001, 42 patients with advanced retromolar and tonsil tumors were compared, 20 undergoing marginal resection of the mandibular bone and 22 undergoing segmental resection of the ascending ramus of the mandible, with regard complications, injury originated from the procedure, locoregional recurrence and survival. RESULTS: From the 20 patients undergoing to marginal mandibulectomy, assessed for a period of 09 to 60 months, seven (35%) patients died of the disease, with a minimal survival of 9 months: 3 due to local recurrence, 3 due to regional recurrence and 1 due to local and regional recurrence. One patient died in the immediate postoperative period. When assessing the surgical part, all the margins were found to be free and in two patients, were considered to be of little depth, one of them being found in one of the patients that died from local recurrence. There was lymph nodal dissemination in 15 patients, with capsular rupture in 4, of which two presented regional recurrence. The locoregional control was obtained in 63% of the patients. From the 22 patients undergoing to segmental resection of the mandibular bone, with a follow-up varying from 14 to 60 months, 8 (36.4%) died of the disease, with a minimum survival of 9 months, 5 due to local recurrence and 3 due to distant recurrence. One patient died in the immediate postoperative period. The surgical margins were considered free from disease in 20 patients and, in three they were too small, one patient died of local recurrence. There was lymph nodal dissemination in 12 patients, and 7 presented capsular rupture. The locoregional control was obtained in 61% of the patients. In the survival analysis curve, by the Kaplan-Meier method, the group submitted to marginal mandibulectomy presented with a rate of 42%, with an interval of 31 to 52 months, standard error of 5 months and confidence interval of 95%, and the group submitted to segmentary resection, 38% with an interval of 27 to 48 months, a standard error of 5 months, and a confidence interval of 95%. The comparison using the non-parametric Log-Rank test presented p<0.8326 and the t-Student test p< 0.621, both not statistically significant. The main complications were local infection in 5 (11.9%) patients and oro-cutaneous fistula in 4 (9.5%). There was one titanium plate fracture, two patients developed osteoradionecrosis and nine temporo-mandibular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: There weren t statistically significant differences between the marginal and the segmental resection groups in relation to the analyzed criteria. So, the preservation of the ascending ramus of the mandible, in lesions which do not present mandible commitment, even if not advanced, doesn t increase the recurrence rate.

INTRODUÇÃO: A ressecção do ramo ascendente da mandíbula foi, durante várias décadas, considerada o tratamento de eleição para os tumores da loja amigdalina e região retromolar, independente do grau de acometimento do osso mandibular, ocasionando um déficit funcional e estético considerável, muitas vezes, com prejuízos irreparáveis à qualidade de vida, às vezes desnecessário. Assim, a ressecção marginal do osso mandibular surgiu como uma alternativa de tratamento viável, uma vez que a manutenção de um segmento do ramo mandibular, em lesões sem comprometimento ósseo, não aumenta os índices de recidiva, tampouco compromete os princípios de radicalidade oncológica. OBJETIVO E MÉTODOS: Por meio de estudo retrospectivo de Outubro de 1994 a Dezembro de 2001, foram comparados 42 pacientes portadores de tumores avançados de região retromolar e loja amigdalina, sendo 20 deles submetidos a ressecção marginal do osso mandibular e 22 submetidos a ressecção do ramo ascendente da mandíbula, em relação a complicações, seqüela de procedimentos, recidiva locorregional e sobrevida. RESULTADOS: Dos 20 pacientes tratados com mandibulectomia marginal, avaliados por um período de 9 a 60 meses, sete (35%) pacientes morreram com doença, com sobrevida mínima de 09 meses, 3 por recidiva local, 3 por recidiva regional e 1 por recidiva locorregional. Um paciente morreu no pós-operatório imediato. Na avaliação da peça cirúrgica encontramos todas as margens livres, considerada exígua em profundidade em dois pacientes, um deles falecido por recidiva local. Houve disseminação linfonodal em 15 pacientes sendo com ruptura extracapsular em 4, encontrada em 2 pacientes com recidiva regional. O controle locorregional foi obtido em 63% dos pacientes. Dos 22 pacientes tratados com ressecção segmentar do osso mandibular, com intervalo de seguimento de 14 a 60 meses, 8 (36,4%) morreram pela doença, com sobrevida mínima de 9 meses, 5 por recidiva local e 3 por recidiva à distância. Um paciente morreu no pós-operatório imediato. As margens foram livres em 20 pacientes e, em 3 exíguas, um deles falecido por recidiva local. Houve disseminação linfonodal em 12 pacientes com ruptura extracapsular em 7 pacientes. O controle locorregional foi obtido em 61% dos pacientes. Na curva de análise de sobrevida, pelo método de Kaplan-Meier, o grupo tratado com mandibulectomia marginal apresentou uma taxa de 42%, com intervalo de 31 a 52 meses, erro padrão de 5 meses e intervalo de confiança de 95% e o grupo tratado com ressecção segmentar 38% com intervalo de 27 a 48 meses, erro padrão de 5 meses, um intervalo de confiança de 95%. A comparação pelo teste de Log Rank, não paramétrico apresentou p<0,8329 e pelo teste t-Student p< 0,621 ambos não significantes. As principais complicações foram a infecção local em 5 (11,9%) pacientes e a fístula orocutânea em 4 (9,5%). Houve uma fratura da placa de titânio, dois pacientes evoluíram com osteorradionecrose e nove com disfunção da articulação têmporo-mandibular. CONCLUSÕES: Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos de ressecção marginal e segmentar nos critérios analisados. Portanto, a conservação do ramo ascendente da mandíbula, em lesões que não apresentem envolvimento mandibular, mesmo avançadas, não aumenta o índice de recidiva. / INTRODUCTION: For several decades, resection of the ascending ramus of the mandible was considered to be mandatory for the treatment of tonsil and retromolar trigone tumours, independent from the damage degree of the mandibular bone, causing considerable functional and aesthetic deficit, many times with irreparable quality of life loss, sometimes unnecessary. Thus, marginal resection of the mandibular bone appeared as a feasible alternative treatment, since maintaining a segment of the mandibular ramus in lesions without bone involvement did not increase the recurrence indexes or compromise the principles of oncological radicalness. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Through a retrospective study from October 1994 to December 2001, 42 patients with advanced retromolar and tonsil tumors were compared, 20 undergoing marginal resection of the mandibular bone and 22 undergoing segmental resection of the ascending ramus of the mandible, with regard complications, injury originated from the procedure, locoregional recurrence and survival. RESULTS: From the 20 patients undergoing to marginal mandibulectomy, assessed for a period of 09 to 60 months, seven (35%) patients died of the disease, with a minimal survival of 9 months: 3 due to local recurrence, 3 due to regional recurrence and 1 due to local and regional recurrence. One patient died in the immediate postoperative period. When assessing the surgical part, all the margins were found to be free and in two patients, were considered to be of little depth, one of them being found in one of the patients that died from local recurrence. There was lymph nodal dissemination in 15 patients, with capsular rupture in 4, of which two presented regional recurrence. The locoregional control was obtained in 63% of the patients. From the 22 patients undergoing to segmental resection of the mandibular bone, with a follow-up varying from 14 to 60 months, 8 (36.4%) died of the disease, with a minimum survival of 9 months, 5 due to local recurrence and 3 due to distant recurrence. One patient died in the immediate postoperative period. The surgical margins were considered free from disease in 20 patients and, in three they were too small, one patient died of local recurrence. There was lymph nodal dissemination in 12 patients, and 7 presented capsular rupture. The locoregional control was obtained in 61% of the patients. In the survival analysis curve, by the Kaplan-Meier method, the group submitted to marginal mandibulectomy presented with a rate of 42%, with an interval of 31 to 52 months, standard error of 5 months and confidence interval of 95%, and the group submitted to segmentary resection, 38% with an interval of 27 to 48 months, a standard error of 5 months, and a confidence interval of 95%. The comparison using the non-parametric Log-Rank test presented p<0.8326 and the t-Student test p< 0.621, both not statistically significant. The main complications were local infection in 5 (11.9%) patients and oro-cutaneous fistula in 4 (9.5%). There was one titanium plate fracture, two patients developed osteoradionecrosis and nine temporo-mandibular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: There weren t statistically significant differences between the marginal and the segmental resection groups in relation to the analyzed criteria. So, the preservation of the ascending ramus of the mandible, in lesions which do not present mandible commitment, even if not advanced, doesn t increase the recurrence rate.