The author studied the welfare state typology in China from a health care perspective. This study aims to figure out what type of welfare typology works in Chinese health care system through comparative welfare state typology, specifically the decommodification principle proposed by Esping-Andersen (2019) and health care decommodification index put forward by Bambra (2006). Studying the classification of Chinese welfare state typology by analysing the Chinese health care system and comparing it with other countries in the world within the scope of welfare state typology, helps China enhancing the public administration. The author found that China belongs to medium decommodification group which means it is the same decommodification level as Conservative-Corporatist regimes, but also indicates there's a huge improvement potential to high decommodification group in the future. Keywords Welfare State Typology; China; Chinese Health Care System; Health Decommodification Index Range of the Thesis: 66 pages

Diploma thesis called "Typology of weak, fragile, failing, failed, collapsed states" lays the objective to look into all kinds of collapsed states, and then it wants to compare to what measurement answers the specified typological conception to the reality. In the introduction the study attends to definitions of the terms state,sovereignty and nation which are nearly connected with the issue. As well the reasons for geographical enlistment will be given at the same time. The first chapter is focused on the characteristic features of the different types of watched states. That is why the comparison of the terms is included, its objective is specification and coherence of the terminology. The next part will be engaged in the application of chosen marks to the concrete African countries. There is simultaneously offered the answer to question, in what way and to what measurement the theoretical conception differ from the real functioning. And then it is seen if the enlistment of countries agrees with their general situation, and there are eventually watched some reasons if it does not agree. The last but one chapter is focused on the critical review of the whole typology of collapsed states and it mediates a wide range of aspects and findings which are brought by the typology. The end provides some...

長久以來，政治學慣於將企業畫歸為私領域活動，鮮於對企業組織及權力進行系統性分析。然而，正是這樣的忽視，使我們難以掌握後全球化時代，面對企業權力的崛起，國家政經結構將何去何從。 緣此，本研究回歸歷史，將長期遭政治學忽視的「企業」，重新置放於現代國家形成的歷史過程中，分析企業與政府，如何在競逐有限資金的過程中，建立起合作關係與制度，進而形成現代民族資本主義國家。並藉由先進/後發、東方/西方四個案例）尼德蘭聯省共和國、英國、日本、中國）的交互比較，進一步探問：為何有些國家由企業主導，形成「企業國家」，如尼德蘭、英國？又為何有些國家最終形成由政府主導的「國家企業」，如日本、中國？ 經過四個案例分析後，本研究提出了一個新的國家建構過程：先是財務需求促成強制權力及資本權力的法人化，形成「政府」與「企業」組織；而後，由於政府與企業在融資上的競合，促成了政府與企業透過財務機制）持股、債務、董事連結），進一步連結成為「國家法人」。而這個由政府與企業組成的國家法人，因成立動機起始於財務需求，因此首先被建立起來的是金融制度。接著，受國際政治及市場競爭壓力，軍事外交部門開始組織化。再者，為獨佔境內資金，政府與企業聯手建立國內政治/市場的統一/壟斷制度。而後，為消弭因不公平分配所導致的叛亂）抗稅、罷工），出現了公共/公司福利制度。現代國家的政經制度：財政金融、軍事外交、社會福利，於焉建立。且正由於國家法人組建的基礎在於財務，因此導致國家走向「企業國家」或「國家企業」的分殊關鍵，即在於政府與企業兩大法人的相對融資能力（financing capacity）。