Syftet med detta arbete är att undersöka hur en grupp särbegåvade personer upplever att de blivit bemötta under sin skolgång och vilket stöd de anser sig ha fått. För att få ännu ett perspektiv har vi underssökt en grupp specialpedagogers erfrenheter av särbegåvade elever.Frågeställningar: Hur upplever för detta elever att skolan har bemött deras särbegåvning? Anser specialpedagogerna att skolan har tillräckliga kunskaper om särbegåvning? Hur kan skolan bli bättre på det här området? Metod och teori: För att ta reda på detta har vi använt oss av metoden med  kvalitativa intervjuer och vi har analyserat dessa genom att använda oss av Bronfenbrenners ekologiska systemteori.Resultat och analys: De resultat vi fått fram visar på att intervjupersonerna upplevt brister i bemötandet inom skolan att nå dessa elever. Många i skolans värld är inte medvetna om vad särbegåvning innebär och de risker som medföljer om inte dessa elever tas om hand på rätt sätt och får det stöd och de utmaningar som de behöver för att må bra. Detta kan resultera i ett mycket dåligt psykiskt mående och skolgången blir lidande.

A problem South-Africa is facing is that the wealth created by mines (also called economic rent) may not yet get distributed satisfactorily evenly between the nation and investors. In an attempt to find a solution to the abovementioned dilemma, government initiated a feasibility study for the nationalisation of mines. This proposal was however waived for two reasons: firstly that it would be unaffordable for government to buy out private companies and secondly, that it would create discontent amongst foreign investors, which would result in them withdrawing access to financing. Consequently, the ANC, during 2012 in the SIMS report proposed a possible implementation of a resource rent tax (RRT), akin to Australia’s, to ensure that the State receives a greater/more equitable share of the wealth. Developments in the mining industry since 2012, have drawn attention to two serious issues: labour related concerns and continued strikes as well as a reduction in foreign direct investment as a result of negative investor sentiment towards South Africa. These issues are directly related to the perception that the community (including mine workers) do not benefit fairly from the wealth created by mines, which results in ongoing labour unrests and subsequently in investment withdrawal. It would seem that even though no further consideration has been given to the implementation of a RRT since 2012, it may be regarded as a possible and sensible solution. This study focuses on the possible impact on the taxation payable by the South African mining industry, if a RRT were to be introduced. Research has been conducted in order to obtain an understanding of the working of a RRT, to analyse South Africa’s current tax regime, to develop a simple hypothetical case study to evaluate both the quantitative and qualitative impact of the introduction of a RRT system on South African mining tax (for both the investor and the state). The study concludes that the introduction of a RRT can potentially result in a more fair distribution of resource rents between the investor and the state (community - rightful owners of the natural resources). Research however proved that this is likely to influence the investor’s investment decisions which in turn may result in a general downturn in mining operations and profits. Based on the qualitative results of a case study, a RRT was proven to be inefficient due to the fact that it will only tax mining companies with a higher rate of return and in effect higher risk companies. As investors are prepared to take on high risk projects for the purpose of generating higher returns, the introduction of an RRT reducing this return might influence an investor’s decision. The potential impact on investors’ decisions may be counteracted through further research with regard to variables used in the RRT model namely the percentage of tax charged and the required rate of return. A RRT is therefore proven to have some benefits, even though some aspects will require further evaluation. / MCom (South African and International Tax), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

A problem South-Africa is facing is that the wealth created by mines (also called economic rent) may not yet get distributed satisfactorily evenly between the nation and investors. In an attempt to find a solution to the abovementioned dilemma, government initiated a feasibility study for the nationalisation of mines. This proposal was however waived for two reasons: firstly that it would be unaffordable for government to buy out private companies and secondly, that it would create discontent amongst foreign investors, which would result in them withdrawing access to financing. Consequently, the ANC, during 2012 in the SIMS report proposed a possible implementation of a resource rent tax (RRT), akin to Australia’s, to ensure that the State receives a greater/more equitable share of the wealth. Developments in the mining industry since 2012, have drawn attention to two serious issues: labour related concerns and continued strikes as well as a reduction in foreign direct investment as a result of negative investor sentiment towards South Africa. These issues are directly related to the perception that the community (including mine workers) do not benefit fairly from the wealth created by mines, which results in ongoing labour unrests and subsequently in investment withdrawal. It would seem that even though no further consideration has been given to the implementation of a RRT since 2012, it may be regarded as a possible and sensible solution. This study focuses on the possible impact on the taxation payable by the South African mining industry, if a RRT were to be introduced. Research has been conducted in order to obtain an understanding of the working of a RRT, to analyse South Africa’s current tax regime, to develop a simple hypothetical case study to evaluate both the quantitative and qualitative impact of the introduction of a RRT system on South African mining tax (for both the investor and the state). The study concludes that the introduction of a RRT can potentially result in a more fair distribution of resource rents between the investor and the state (community - rightful owners of the natural resources). Research however proved that this is likely to influence the investor’s investment decisions which in turn may result in a general downturn in mining operations and profits. Based on the qualitative results of a case study, a RRT was proven to be inefficient due to the fact that it will only tax mining companies with a higher rate of return and in effect higher risk companies. As investors are prepared to take on high risk projects for the purpose of generating higher returns, the introduction of an RRT reducing this return might influence an investor’s decision. The potential impact on investors’ decisions may be counteracted through further research with regard to variables used in the RRT model namely the percentage of tax charged and the required rate of return. A RRT is therefore proven to have some benefits, even though some aspects will require further evaluation. / MCom (South African and International Tax), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

Anecdotal data affirms that companies applying Lean Six Sigma in their operations not only deliver higher quality products and services, but also obtain superior financial results. The goal of this research was to empirically verify anecdotal data. The study proposed to analyze a group of publicly traded manufacturing companies with the intent of verifying if a correlation exists between companies being lean and the attainment of superior returns on investments. The researcher performed a series of statistical tests comparing key Financial Performance Indicators (FPI) extracted from annual reports (10-K) from a large pool of companies. The outcome of this study showed that superior financial rewards result from a systematic application of lean and quality tools. At the conclusion of this thesis we verified that companies having a business model that stimulates a high level of communication between them and their markets - because they are lean - obtained substantially higher financial advantages when compared to companies that still followed a more traditional mode of production. The results also revealed that lean companies obtained on average Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) 10% higher than mass producers. Therefore, companies wanting to strategically invest their capital should consider Lean Six Sigma as a source of competitive advantage. Another strategic insight derived from this study was the recognition of signs of a smart business. Potential investors should look for the presence of lean and quality improvement programs as one sign that capital is being wisely invested to generate value. Another sign is how well historically ROIC have performed against Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). The research revealed that, on average, lean companies had ROIC of 16%. Assuming that the hurdle rate (WACC) for most companies is near 10%, having ROIC of 16% is an incentive to become lean, thus allowing such companies to create value for their shareholders. Finally, we learned that many factors affect ROIC, namely, brand equity, market positioning, patents, core competency, innovation, leadership, etc. However, the presence of a Lean Six Sigma program in a manufacturing business was a strong positive factor impacting ROIC.