Emergence of the metacommunity concept has explicitly recognized the interplay of local and regional processes. The metacommunity concept has already made a substantial contribution to the better understanding of the community composition and dynamics in a regional context. However, long-term field data for testing of available metacommunity models are still scarce and the extent to which these models apply to the real world remains unknown and some of their assumptions untested. Tests conducted so far have largely sought to fit data on the entire regional set of species to one of several metacommunity models, implicitly assuming that all species, members of the metacommunity, can be modelled in the same manner (using a single model). However, species differ in their habitat use to the extent that such uniform treatment may be inappropriate. Furthermore, in testing the metacommunity models, all metacommunity studies relay on snapshots of species distribution to assess the relative importance of local and regional processes. However, snapshot patterns may be insufficient for producing a reliable picture of metacommunity dynamics and processes shaping it. I hypothesised that the relative importance of local (competition, predation or abiotic filtering or constraints) and regional (interaction of populations with landscape, migration or dispersal) processes may vary with species' traits, including habitat specialization. The perception of importance of local and regional processes in structuring community composition obtained via static approach may vary from that obtained by considering the temporal dynamics of component species. My general approach used a model system comprising natural rock pools microcosms. I have also employed experimental approach in the laboratory. I found that different metacommunity models suit for different groups of habitat specialization. I also found this to be true whether the analyses are based on snapshot data or describing temporal dynamics of species populations. These results suggest that a metacommunity system exhibits an internal differentiation of structuring processes. Specifically, from the metacommunity perspective, the dynamics of habitat specialists are best explained by a combination of species sorting and mass effects models, while that of habitat generalists is best explained by patch dynamics and neutral models. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Les abeilles sont des pollinisateurs essentiels pour les cultures et les plantes sauvages, mais l'intensification des pratiques agricoles a engendré une baisse importante de leur abondance et diversité. Afin de protéger efficacement les abeilles dans les paysages agricoles, il est nécessaire d'avoir une meilleure connaissance de leurs patrons de diversité. L'objectif général de cette thèse était de déterminer les patrons spatio-temporels de la diversité des abeilles et l'utilisation des ressource fleuries dans un système agricole intensif. L'échantillonnage spatialement extensif de l'activité de butinage des abeilles sauvages et domestiques nous a permis de recenser 45040 individus (29314 abeilles domestiques et 15726 sauvages), appartenant à 192 espèces recensées à l'échelle territoriale. Cette diversité représente près de 20% de la richesse des espèces apiformes connues à l'échelle nationale. Cette communauté est caractérisée par une forte proportion d'espèces rares (28,8%) et de fortes variations temporelles et spatiales, en particulier de l'échelle locale jusqu'à 10-20 km2. L'importance des habitats semi-naturels pour soutenir les populations d'abeilles sauvages a été confirmée dans cette étude. Durant les périodes de floraison des cultures oléagineuses, les abeilles sauvages étaient étroitement associées aux habitats semi-naturels alors que les abeilles domestiques ont montré une nette préférence pour les cultures à floraison massive. La diversité des abeilles sauvages dans les habitats semi- naturels était 3-4 fois supérieure à celle observée dans le colza ou le tournesol. L'importance de certains facteurs écologiques clefs pour la diversité des abeilles, comme la richesse floristique locale et la quantité d'habitats semi-naturels dans le paysage, a été confirmée et quantifiée. Il a également été démontré que ces effets varient en fonction de la saison et de l'échelle spatiale. Ces résultats mettent en évidence les processus écologiques responsables des partons de diversité des abeilles à différentes échelles spatiales, et peuvent contribuer à optimiser la conception des mesures de conservation visant à promouvoir la diversité des abeilles dans les agrosystèmes intensifs. / Bees are essential pollinators for crops and wild plants, but theintensification of agricultural practices have contributed to a significantdecline in their abundance and diversity. To effectively protect andpromote the bee fauna in agroecosystems, a better knowledge of theirdiversity patterns is required. The over-arching objective of this thesiswas to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of bee diversity andfloral resource use in an intensive agricultural system in western France.A spatially extensive survey of foraging wild bees and honey bees returned45.040 individual records at the territorial scale (29.314 honey bees and15.726 wild bees), representing 192 species, i.e. nearly 20% of the speciesrichness reported at the national scale. The bee community wascharacterised by a large proportion of uncommon species (28.8 %) and bysignificant temporal and spatial variations of the diversity, especially atlocal scales up to 10-20 km2. The importance of semi-natural habitats forsustaining wild bee populations was highlighted in this study. Duringoleaginous crop flowering periods, wild bees were tightly associated withsemi-natural habitats while honey bees have shown a clear preference formass-flowering crops. The diversity of foraging wild bees was 3-4 timesgreater in semi-natural habitats than in oilseed rape or sunflower fields.The importance of some keystone ecological correlates of bee diversity,such as the local floral richness and the amount of semi-natural habitatsin the vicinity, has been confirmed and quantified. It was also evidencedthat their effect varies among seasons and spatial scales. These resultshighlight the ecological processes underlying bee diversity patterns atdifferent spatial scales, and further help to optimise the efficiency ofconservation measures intended to promote bee diversity in intensiveagrosystems.

No description available.