Diss.--Kiel--Univ., 1992. / Bibliogr. p. 203-229.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1976. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1995. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [262]-297).

Thesis--University of Wisconsin--Madison. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 239-242).

Thesis--University of Florida. / Description based on print version record. Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 272-278).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University, 2003. / Advisor: Carl Cuneo. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 219-229). Also available via World Wide Web.

Thesis (M.A.)--Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 2005. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-120).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Dallas Theological Seminary, 1985. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [78]-83).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Boston University / Both the problan and methodology of the dissertation follow this pattern: (1) a presentation of Ferre's views regarding redemption, (2) comparisons with the other three selected theologians, (3) an ordered summary of Ferre's relative theological position. This summary appears in chapter eight and briefly notes some similarities and dissimilarities among the other three theologians. Chapter two presents the term redemption and its correlatives as used in standard Protestant reference works. This determines the areas treated in chapters three through seven. The study includes these conclusions: (1) Knowledge of God as agape is limited to God's revelatory work made known in Jesus Christ in Ferre's, as in Aulen's and Brunner's writings. DeWolf adds theistic evidences. (2) God as being is uncaused and unconditioned but He becomes by creation and by redemptive personal relations with men for Ferre as for DeWolf. God is being is self-sufficient, with creation, preservation and redemption optional self-giving activities in Aulen's and Brunner's writings. For Aulen this is a paradox. Brunner concludes that God acts to realize His glory. (3) An essential but unfulfilled image within man awaits maturing experiences and Divine-human encounter in Ferre's and DeWolf's writings. Brunner emphasizes God's sole initiative so that maturing experiences seem to be negated. Aulen paradoxically asserts that man is essentially opposed to God yet chooses opposition. Paradoxically reconciliation depends upon God's subduing activity, yet upon man's "yes." (4) Jesus Christ is understood as truly God and truly man by Ferre as by Aulen and Brunner. The latter two do not, like Ferre, explain the Incarnation by perichoresis. DeWolf asserts that God's will and purpose were perfectly Incarnate in the human Jesus. Ferre has a distinct emphasis concerning the repeatability of the Incarnation, and concerning the Trinity. (5) At-one-ment in Ferre's distinct view is based upon perichoresis. All four theologians conclude that at-one-ment is offered to all men in Jesus Christ. Aulen's distinct view emphasizes fusion of wrath and love within God. (6) Personal depth repentance results in a reconciled relationship with God and fellowmen in Ferre's writings as in those of the other three theologians. The image within leads to such repentance for Ferre as for DeWolf. Paradoxically, for Aulen man's "yes" is indispensable yet all depends upon God's subduing activity. Brunner sees all human seeking as egocentric and doomed to frustration. Thus, Divine-human encounter, solely initiated by God, alone, leads to repentance and reconciliation. (7) Saints are nurtured by prayer, worship and witnessing. They are not free from sin but can partially demonstrate victorious love and power over sin in Ferre's writings as in the writings of the other men. Ferre, like DeWolf, makes more enthusiastic assertions of victory. [TRUNCATED]

Submitted by Roberth Novaes (roberth.novaes@live.com) on 2018-07-16T13:14:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MESTRADO_Dissertacao_Plutarco_Ryszard.pdf: 1444483 bytes, checksum: 407185b2d5e4e4ac4a62da590ca53462 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Setor de Periódicos (per_macedocosta@ufba.br) on 2018-07-16T20:01:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MESTRADO_Dissertacao_Plutarco_Ryszard.pdf: 1444483 bytes, checksum: 407185b2d5e4e4ac4a62da590ca53462 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-16T20:01:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MESTRADO_Dissertacao_Plutarco_Ryszard.pdf: 1444483 bytes, checksum: 407185b2d5e4e4ac4a62da590ca53462 (MD5) / Plutarco de Queroneia (46-120) foi um prolífico polímata grego do período do Império Romano. Plutarco se destacou nos campos da Literatura, História, biografia, retórica e da filosofia. A obra de Plutarco teve o objetivo de preservar a cultura e a identidade gregas e promover esta cultura grega perante Roma, acentuando a helenização do povo romano. Este presente texto constitui uma experiência de crítica literária baseada, sobretudo, no método de Otto Maria Carpeaux associado com a crítica de Harold Bloom. Neste texto são estudados os elementos literários das duas principais biografias de Plutarco: Vida de Alexandre e Vida de Júlio César, além da atividade comparativa entre Plutarco, Homero e Platão. / Plutarch of Queroneia was a prolific Greek polymath of the Roman Empire. The work of Plutarch excelled in the fields of Literature, History, biography, rhetoric and philosophy. The Plutarch‟s work aimed to preserve the Greek culture and Greek identity and promote this Greek culture in Rome, accentuating the Hellenization of the Roman elite. This present text is an experience of literary criticism based primarily on Otto Maria Carpeaux Method associated with the criticism of Harold Bloom. Here, have studied the literary elements of the two major biographies of Plutarch: Life of Alexander and Life of Julius Caesar, in addition to comparative activity among Plutarch, Homer and Plato.