Fragestellung Die Prognose eines akuten Hirninfarktes bei Verschluss einer proximalen Hirnarterie ist trotz der intravenösen Thrombolyse mit rtPA ungünstig. Kann die kombinierte pharmaco-mechanische Rekanalisation von proximalen Gefäßverschlüssen bei akutem Hirninfarkt zu einer Verbesserung des klinischen Ergebnisses führen? Methoden Wir analysierten retrospektiv 66 konsekutiv aufgenommene Patienten (36m, 30w; mittleres Alter 61 Jahre (23-86 Jahre), die von 2010 bis 2012 kombiniert pharmako-mechanisch intra-arteriell behandelt wurden. 32 Patienten wiesen einen kombinierten ACI-/M1-Verschluss, 23 einen M1-Verschluss und 11 eine Basilaristhrombose auf. Mittlerer NIHSS lag bei 23. 57 Patienten erhielten eine kombinierte pharmaco-mechanische Therapie, 3 Patienten wurden lediglich pharmakologisch und 6 Patienten rein mechanisch rekanalisiert. Rekanalisierung bei 35 Patienten mit einem Stent-Retriever (32 Patienten mit pREset, 3 Patienten mit SOLITAIRE) erfolgt. Bei 46 Patienten wurde rtPA und bei 32 Patienten Tirofiban als Bridging Verfahren eingesetzt. Eine Stentanlage erfolgte in 28,78% der Fälle. Ergebnisse Die erzielten Rekanalisationsraten lagen bei 89,4% bei einer mittleren Dauer der Intervention von 96 Minuten (53,03% unter 90 Min.). Ein günstiges klinisches Ergebnis nach mRS (mRS 0-2) wurde bei 48% der Patienten erreicht. Die Rate an symptomatischen intrazerebralen Blutungen lag bei 4,55%. Die Mortalität war 19,7%. Die multivariate Regressionsanalyse ergab als modifizierbare Prediktoren für ein günstiges Outcome die Dauer bis zur Rekanalisation und die Gabe von rtPA. Schlussfolgerungen Die kombinierte endovaskuläre pharmako-mechanische Therapie kann die Mortalität und Morbidität von Schlaganfallpatienten mit Verschlüssen einer proximalen Hirnarterie reduzieren. / Background The prognosis of ischemic stroke due to occlusion of proximal intracranial arteries is poor, even with intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis. Can a combined pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis lead to a better Outcome in this patients? Materials and methods We analysed 66 consecutive patients (36m, 30f; mean age 61, range 23 - 86 years), treated with a combined pharmaco-mechanical intra-arterial thrombolysis from 2010 to 2012. 32 patients presented with ICA and MCA tandem occlusions, 23 with occlusion of the main trunk of the MCA, and 11 of the BA. The mean NIH-Stroke-Scale (NIHSS) at admission was 23. 57 patients underwent combined pharmaco-mechanical thrombolisys, 3 patients were only pharmacological and 6 patients only mechanical recanalised. In 35 patients were Stent-Retriever-Systems utilized (32 patients pREset, 3 patients SOLITAIRE). A bridging therapie with rtPA was in 46 patients used and with tirofiban in 32 patients. Stenting were performed as well in 28,78%. Results The Rekanalizationrate was 89,4%. The mean duration of the intervention was 96 minutes (53,03% under 90 minutes). After rehabilitation had 48% of our patient a favorable outcome measured with the mRS (mRS 0-2).The procent of sICH in our patients was 4,55. The Mortality was 19.7%. The modifiable Predictors for a favorable Outcome detected with a multivariate logistic regression analysis were the time to recanalisation and the bridging therapy with rtPA. Conclusion The combined intra-arterial pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis may reduce mortality and morbidity after occlusions of the proximal intracranial arteries in acute stroke patients.

Background: While intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in ischemic stroke can be safely applied in telestroke networks within 3 h from symptom onset, there is a lack of evidence for safety in the expanded 3- to 4. 5-h time window. We assessed the safety and short-term efficacy of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the expanded time window delivered through a hub-and-spoke telestroke network. Methods: Observational study of patients with AIS who received IVT at the Stroke Eastern Saxony Telemedical Network between 01/2014 and 12/2015. We compared safety data including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH; according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II definition) and any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) between patients admitted to telestroke spoke sites and patients directly admitted to a tertiary stroke center representing the hub of the network. We also assessed short-term efficacy data including favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge, hospital discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 152 patients with AIS were treated with IVT in the expanded time window [spoke sites, n = 104 (26.9%); hub site, n = 48 (25.9%)]. Patients treated at spoke sites had less frequently a large vessel occlusion [8/104 (7.7) vs. 20/48 (41.7%); p < 0.0001], a determined stroke etiology (p < 0.0001) and had slightly shorter onset-to-treatment times [210 (45) vs. 228 (58) min; p = 0.02] than patients who presented to the hub site. Both cohorts did not display any further differences in demographics, vascular risk factors, median baseline NIHSS scores, or median baseline Alberta stroke program early CT score (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the frequency of sICH (4.9 vs. 6.3%; p = 0.71) or any ICH (8.7 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.15). Neither there was a difference regarding favorable functional outcome (44.1 vs. 39.6%; p = 0.6) nor median NIHSS [3 (5.5) vs. 2.5 (5.75); p = 0.92] at discharge, hospital discharge disposition (p = 0.28), or in-hospital mortality (9.6 vs. 8.3%; p = 1.0). Multivariable modeling did not reveal an association between telestroke and sICH or favorable functional outcome (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Delivery of IVT in the expanded 3- to 4.5-h time window through a telestroke network appears to be safe with equivalent short-term functional outcomes for spoke-and-hub center admissions.