Submitted by Adriana Alves Rodrigues (aalves@espm.br) on 2017-11-14T15:01:07Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MATHEUS ALVES PASSARO.pdf: 84015636 bytes, checksum: e2f9744432e5ca11d373206bb985b176 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Alves Rodrigues (aalves@espm.br) on 2017-11-14T15:02:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MATHEUS ALVES PASSARO.pdf: 84015636 bytes, checksum: e2f9744432e5ca11d373206bb985b176 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Cristina Ropero (ana@espm.br) on 2017-11-22T12:56:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MATHEUS ALVES PASSARO.pdf: 84015636 bytes, checksum: e2f9744432e5ca11d373206bb985b176 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-22T12:56:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MATHEUS ALVES PASSARO.pdf: 84015636 bytes, checksum: e2f9744432e5ca11d373206bb985b176 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-31 / This research analyzes the relations between communication, consumption and migrations from the study of the production and reception processes of the photographic exhibition "Somos Todos Imigrantes", seeking to understand the frameworks and perceptions surrounding the media visibility and of transnational immigrants in the city of São Paulo. The theoretical framework covers the conceptual field of communication, consumption, citizenship, image, visualities and migrations transnational corporations. The methodology of the research is based on bibliographic research and documentary; observation of production spaces and reception of the photographic exhibition; collection and exposure image analysis; interviews with producers and the immigrant public and not immigrant. The results of the research point to three main dimensions that resulting from the processes of production of the appropriations of the photographic exposure: (1) the recognition of a dominant media visibility that hierarchizes the immigrants and associates them with problem, conflict, poverty; (2) the possibilities of setting up other citizen visions, especially those that uniquely distinguish, without folklore, and favor a humanizing approach with the immigrant Other; and (3) the limits imposed other visibilities in the field of migration that the need for public policies that assure immigrants access to and occupation of both from the media and from the city . / Esta pesquisa analisa as relações entre comunicação, consumo e migrações a partir do estudo dos processos de produção e recepção da exposição fotográfica "Somos Todos Imigrantes", buscando compreender os enquadramentos e percepções em torno da visibilidade midiática e pública dos imigrantes transnacionais na cidade de São Paulo. O referencial teórico abrange o campo conceitual da comunicação, consumo, cidadania, imagem, visualidades e migrações transnacionais. A metodologia da pesquisa fundamenta-se em pesquisa bibliográfica e documental; observação de espaços de produção e recepção da mostra fotográfica; coleta e análise das imagens da exposição; entrevistas com os produtores e com o público imigrante e não imigrante. Os resultados da pesquisa apontam para três dimensões principais que resultam dos processos de produção de das apropriações das imagens fotográficas da exposição: (1) o reconhecimento de uma visibilidade midiática dominante que hierarquiza os imigrantes e os associa a problema, conflito, pobreza; (2) as possibilidades de constituição de outras visibilidades cidadãs, especialmente aquelas que singularizam, sem folclorizar, e favorecem uma aproximação humanizadora com o Outro imigrante; e (3) os limites impostos à produção dessas outras visibilidades no campo das migrações que aparecem associados à necessidade de políticas públicas que assegurem aos imigrantes acesso e ocupação de espaços tanto da mídia quando da cidade.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T17:55:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 23 / Nenhuma / A pesquisa busca compreender as dinâmicas dos usos sociais da internet por migrantes latino-americanos, de maneira a refletir sobre o modo como questões identitárias atravessam usos da rede mundial de computadores, demandando apropriações de seus ambientes comunicacionais e configurando estratégias para o acesso a condições diferenciadas de cidadania. Para isso, são discutidos os conceitos de identidade, cidadania e usos sociais da internet, a partir da aproximação ao cenário múltiplo e complexo da América Latina e da dinâmica das migrações transnacionais contemporâneas. A investigação parte da compreensão de que vivemos em uma sociedade em rede, marcada por uma lógica de interações não-hierárquicas, flexíveis, interdependentes, e organizada pela mediação das tecnologias da informação e da comunicação, o que é estudado, na pesquisa, em relação às especificidades ligadas ao fenômeno migratório. Para a investigação empírica dos usos sociais da internet é construído um percurso metodológico a partir de uma persp / The research aims to understand the dynamics of the social uses of the internet by Latin American migrants, in order to reflect on how identity issues cross uses of the world-wide web, demanding appropriations of their communication environments and setting strategies to access different conditions of citizenship. To do so, the concepts of identity, citizenship and social uses of the internet are discussed, through the approach to the multiple and complex Latin America landscape and to the contemporary transnational migrations dynamics. The investigation stems from the understanding that we live in a networked society, marked by a logic of non-hierarchical, flexible, interdependent, and organized interactions through the mediation of information technology and communication, which are studied in the survey in relation to the specificities of the migration phenomenon. For the empirical investigation of the social uses of the internet, it is made a methodological approach from an ethnographic perspective, which

La violence chronique qui caractérise la Somalie depuis plus de deux décennies a forcé près de deux millions de personnes à fuir. Cette ethnographie étudie l’expérience de l’asile prolongé de jeunes Somaliens qui ont grandi au camp de Kakuma, au Kenya. Leur expérience est hors du commun, bien qu’un nombre croissant de réfugiés passent de longues années dans des camps pourtant conçus comme temporaires, en vertu de la durée des conflits et de la normalisation de pratiques de mise à l’écart de populations « indésirables ». Nous explorons la perception qu’ont ces jeunes de leur environnement et de quelle façon leur exil structure leur perception du passé et de leur pays d’origine, et de leur futur. Ce faisant, nous considérons à la fois les spécificités du contexte et l’environnement global, afin de comprendre comment l’expérience des gens est façonnée par (et façonne) les dynamiques sociales, politiques, économiques et historiques. Nous observons que le camp est, et demeure, un espace de confinement, indépendamment de sa durée d’existence ; bien que conçu comme un lieu de gestion rationnelle des populations, le camp devient un monde social où se développent de nouvelles pratiques ; les jeunes Somaliens font preuve d’agentivité et interprètent leur expérience de manière à rendre leur quotidien acceptable ; ces derniers expriment une frustration croissante lorsque leurs études sont terminées et qu’ils peinent à s’établir en tant qu’adultes, ce qui exacerbe leur désir de quitter le camp. En effet, même s’il existe depuis plus de 20 ans, le camp demeure un lieu de transition. L’expérience de jeunes Somaliens qui ont grandi dans un camp de réfugiés n’a pas été étudiée auparavant. Nous soutenons que cette expérience est caractérisée par des tensions entre contraintes et opportunités, mobilité et immobilité, isolation et connexion ou victimisation et affirmation du sujet – et des temporalités contradictoires. Cette étude souligne que des notions comme la convivialité ou la pluralité des appartenances développées dans la littérature sur la cohabitation interethnique dans les villes ou sur l’identité des migrants aident à appréhender le réalité du camp. Cette ethnographie montre également que, loin d’être des victimes passives, les réfugiés contribuent à trouver des solutions à leur exil. / Chronic violence has characterized Somalia for over two decades, forcing nearly two million people to flee. This ethnography studies the experience of protracted exile of Somalis who were raised in Kakuma refugee camp, in Kenya, and are now young adults. Their experience is relatively uncommon, although increasing numbers of people spend long periods in camps conceived as temporary, due to the length of conflicts and the normalization of excluding populations deemed undesirable. I explore how young people perceive their living environment and how growing up in exile structures their view of the past and their country of origin, and the future and its possibilities. In doing so, I regularly shift perspectives from the specificities of the context to the global environment, to understand how people’s experience is shaped by (and shapes) the social, political, economical and historical dynamics in which it is embedded. My observations can be summarized into a few broad statements: regardless of how long it has existed, the camp is and remains a space of containment; conceived as a rationally organized space to manage populations, the camp becomes a messier social world where new practices develop; young Somalis display agency and interpret their experience in a way that makes the present bearable; frustration grows when Somali youth complete their education and struggle to establish themselves as adults, catalyzing their determination to leave Kakuma. Indeed, although refugees have been living there since the early 1990s, the camp remains a space of transition. Although there have been a number of studies on refugee camps in Kenya, no study has focused on the experience of Somali youth raised in a refugee camp. I argue that this experience is traversed and shaped by tensions between constraints and opportunities, mobility and immobility, isolation and connectedness, victimization and affirmation of the subject, citizenship and refugeeness – and by conflicting temporalities. This ethnographic study highlights the fact that notions such as conviviality or the multiplicity of people’s belongings developed in the literature on interethnic cohabitation in cities or the ethnic identity of migrants, help us to understand the camp experience. This research also shows that, far from being powerless victims, people actively contribute to finding solutions to their exile.

L’ethnographie de la détention frontalière en France se penche sur le phénomène des migrations transnationales et sur le gouvernement des frontières qui y répond, à travers des pratiques d’enfermement et d’expulsion des étrangers dans une « zone d’attente » aéroportuaire. La construction des camps d’étrangers, dont relève ce terrain, témoigne de nouvelles distributions du pouvoir qui passent par l’accès à la mobilité. L’étude empirique d’une forme particulière de ce contrôle est ainsi le point de départ d’une réflexion plus large sur ce régime de gouvernement, qui dessine une autre topographie politique de la globalisation. L’enquête nous invite à comprendre les pratiques par lesquelles les gouvernements démocratiques administrent des populations non-citoyennes, et la façon dont ces modalités de prise en charge et de surveillance opèrent une reconfiguration des frontières physiques, morales et politiques. L’ethnographie s’interroge sur l’expérience quotidienne de ceux qui sont les sujets de ces régimes juridiques et humanitaires croisés. Le confinement des étrangers entrecroise plusieurs dimensions, qui organisent la recherche : la construction d’un enfermement humanitaire, et les usages institutionnels et militants de différents régimes de droits qui y sont en jeu; les pratiques de prise en charge de populations identifiées comme vulnérables; les reconfigurations de la frontière à travers de nouvelles formes réticulaires et zonales; et enfin, l’expérience de circulation que dessinent les archipels de surveillance, et les pratiques de gestion différentielle des mobilités dont participent les zones d’attente. / This ethnographic study of border detention in France investigates how, in response to trends in transnational migration, borders are governed through practices such as the confinement and deportation of foreign migrants. In particular, the increasing prominence of camps or other restricted areas in which migrants or illegal aliens are held for varying lengths of time highlight a new distribution of power, defined by access to mobility. Focusing on a specific form of control – the “waiting zone” at an airport's borders – this empirical study offers an in depth meditation on this power dynamic, which reflects, in itself, another political topography of globalization. The research investigates how democratic governments manage non citizen populations, and examines the ways in which the types of restriction and surveillance brought to bear on these people reconfigure physical, moral and political boundaries. The ethnographic components of the study seek to explore the everyday experience of the people who become subject to these tangled legal and humanitarian procedures. The research interweaves several key issues which shape policy on border detention: confinement, albeit in a humanitarian form, constructed through judicial activism and the administrative application of different standards of rights for various alien populations; the conflation of humanitarian care and control for populations identified as vulnerable; the redrawing of frontiers through networks and zones; and, lastly, the experience of mobility produced by the differential management of movement within the modern archipelagos of surveillance, of which waiting zones are part.

No description available.