abstract: Understanding how adherence affects outcomes is crucial when developing and assigning interventions. However, interventions are often evaluated by conducting randomized experiments and estimating intent-to-treat effects, which ignore actual treatment received. Dose-response effects can supplement intent-to-treat effects when participants are offered the full dose but many only receive a partial dose due to nonadherence. Using these data, we can estimate the magnitude of the treatment effect at different levels of adherence, which serve as a proxy for different levels of treatment. In this dissertation, I conducted Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate when linear dose-response effects can be accurately and precisely estimated in randomized experiments comparing a no-treatment control condition to a treatment condition with partial adherence. Specifically, I evaluated the performance of confounder adjustment and instrumental variable methods when their assumptions were met (Study 1) and when their assumptions were violated (Study 2). In Study 1, the confounder adjustment and instrumental variable methods provided unbiased estimates of the dose-response effect across sample sizes (200, 500, 2,000) and adherence distributions (uniform, right skewed, left skewed). The adherence distribution affected power for the instrumental variable method. In Study 2, the confounder adjustment method provided unbiased or minimally biased estimates of the dose-response effect under no or weak (but not moderate or strong) unobserved confounding. The instrumental variable method provided extremely biased estimates of the dose-response effect under violations of the exclusion restriction (no direct effect of treatment assignment on the outcome), though less severe violations of the exclusion restriction should be investigated. / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Psychology 2018

Le port d’un corset orthopédique de 20 à 23 heures par jour est reconnu comme efficace pour prévenir la progression de la courbe chez les adolescents atteints de scoliose idiopathique, mais il engendre des conséquences biopsychosociales importantes qui perturbent leur quotidien et qui contribuent à un problème de non-adhésion au corset généralisé. En effet, le temps de port réel observé est d’environ 12 heures par jour. Il n’existe aucune intervention dans la littérature qui vise à améliorer l’adhésion au corset pour cette population spécifique. Le but de ce mémoire était de concevoir un modèle interprofessionnel d’interventions de soutien à l’adhésion au traitement par corset chez les patients atteints de scoliose idiopathique. Pour répondre à ce but, nous avons effectué des entrevues individuelles auprès de neuf professionnels d’expertises variées afin de comprendre leurs perspectives et leurs stratégies potentielles pour soutenir les patients vers une meilleure adhésion au corset. Les entrevues ont été enregistrées, transcrites et codées. Nous avons procédé à l’analyse thématique des verbatim et conçu le modèle d’intervention résultant. Lors des entrevues, les participants ont relevé des barrières à l’adhésion au corset et au soutien professionnel ainsi que des stratégies fonctionnelles, éducatives, motivationnelles, psychologiques et interprofessionnelles pour répondre à ces barrières. Le modèle a été validé par un panel d’experts cliniques. Le modèle d’intervention Interprofessionnel en Soutien à l’Adhésion (IPSA) au traitement par corset est structuré en trois paliers (préparation au corset, ateliers de groupe et consultation individuelle) et nous estimons qu’il a un grand potentiel d’implantation en clinique de scoliose. / Wearing a spinal brace between 20 to 23 hours a day is recognized as effective to prevent curve progression in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, but it generates important biopsychosocial consequences that disturb patients’ daily activities and that contribute to the generalized problem of brace nonadherence. Indeed, the observed time spent in-brace is approximately 12 hours a day. A thorough review of the literature could not yield any intervention to enhance brace adherence for this specific population. The purpose of this master’s thesis is to develop an interprofessional support intervention model to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. To fulfill this purpose, we have conducted individual interviews with 9 professionals of various expertise in order to understand their perspectives and their potential strategies to support patients towards better brace adherence. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and coded. We proceeded to a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts, which resulted in the intervention model. During the interviews, participants mentioned adherence barriers to brace treatment and professional support barriers as well as functional, educational, motivational, psychological and interprofessional teamwork strategies for answering these issues. The model was reviewed by an expert panel of clinicians. The Interprofessional Adherence Support intervention model (IPAS) to brace treatment is three-tiered to provide different levels of intensity of support to patients (brace preparation, group workshops and one-on-one consultations) and has great potential for implementation in clinical practice.