Introdução: Os corticosteroides intra-articulares (IA) são amplamente utilizados no tratamento da osteoartrite (OA) de joelho, porém é desconhecido qual dentre estes agentes é o mais eficaz. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar a eficácia das infiltrações IA de triancinolona hexacetonida (TH) e de acetato de metilprednisolona (AM) na OA de joelho. Pacientes e Métodos: Pacientes com OA sintomática de joelho, graus II ou III de Kellgren-Lawrence, foram randomizados para receber uma única infiltração IA com 40mg de TH ou AM. As avaliações clínicas foram realizadas nas semanas 4, 12 e 24. O desfecho primário do estudo foi a melhora da dor do joelho pelo paciente por escala visual analógica (EVA) da visita basal à semana 4. Os desfechos secundários incluíram a avaliação global da doença pelo paciente e pelo médico, o questionário de osteoartrite Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), o índice de Lequesne e o critério de resposta Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI). Na análise estatística, foram empregadas equações de estimativa generalizada, com estatística de Wald para contrastes do tipo 3 e ajustes de Tukey-Kramer para comparações múltiplas. Resultados: Cem pacientes foram incluídos na população com intenção de tratar, 50 em cada braço do estudo. Uma melhora significativa na dor pela EVA foi observada na semana 4 para ambos os grupos (P < 0,0001), não havendo diferença entre eles (P=0,352). Esta melhora foi sustentada até a semana 24. Uma melhora significativa em relação à avaliação basal foi observada na avaliação global da doença pelo paciente e pelo médico, no questionário WOMAC e no índice de Lequesne, não havendo diferença entre os grupos. A melhora nos desfechos secundários de avaliação foi sustentada durante o estudo, exceto para a avaliação global da doença pelo paciente. O critério de resposta OMERACT-OARSI foi alcançado por 74% e 72% dos pacientes dos grupos TH e AM, respectivamente. Conclusão: TH e AM são igualmente eficazes na OA de joelho, e a melhora na dor e na função física pode ser sustentada por até 24 semanas / Introduction: Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections are broadly used in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), but it is unknown which of these agents is the most effective. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) and methylprednisolone acetate (MA) IA injections in knee OA. Patients and Methods: Patients with symptomatic knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence grades II or III, were randomized to receive a single IA injection with 40mg of TH or MA. Evaluations were performed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate the improvement in the patient\'s knee pain by visual analogue scale (VAS) from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes included the global assessment of the disease by the patient and the physician, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis questionnaire (WOMAC), the Lequesne index and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria of response. Generalized estimating equations with Wald statistics for type 3 contrasts and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison adjustment were employed in statistical analysis. Results: The intention-to-treat population included one hundred patients; 50 in each study arm. A significant improvement in pain by VAS was observed at week 4 for both groups (P<0.0001), with no difference between them (P=0.352). This improvement was sustained up to week 24. A significant improvement from the baseline was observed for the patients\' and the physicians\' global assessments, WOMAC questionnaire, and Lequesne index, with no differences between the groups. Improvements in the secondary outcomes were sustained during the study, except for the patients\' global assessment of disease. OMERACT-OARSI criteria of response was achieved by 74% and 72% of patients in the TH and the MA groups, respectively. Conclusion: TH and MA are equally effective in knee OA and improvement in pain and physical function can be sustained for up to 24 week

Introdução: Os corticosteroides intra-articulares (IA) são amplamente utilizados no tratamento da osteoartrite (OA) de joelho, porém é desconhecido qual dentre estes agentes é o mais eficaz. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar a eficácia das infiltrações IA de triancinolona hexacetonida (TH) e de acetato de metilprednisolona (AM) na OA de joelho. Pacientes e Métodos: Pacientes com OA sintomática de joelho, graus II ou III de Kellgren-Lawrence, foram randomizados para receber uma única infiltração IA com 40mg de TH ou AM. As avaliações clínicas foram realizadas nas semanas 4, 12 e 24. O desfecho primário do estudo foi a melhora da dor do joelho pelo paciente por escala visual analógica (EVA) da visita basal à semana 4. Os desfechos secundários incluíram a avaliação global da doença pelo paciente e pelo médico, o questionário de osteoartrite Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), o índice de Lequesne e o critério de resposta Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI). Na análise estatística, foram empregadas equações de estimativa generalizada, com estatística de Wald para contrastes do tipo 3 e ajustes de Tukey-Kramer para comparações múltiplas. Resultados: Cem pacientes foram incluídos na população com intenção de tratar, 50 em cada braço do estudo. Uma melhora significativa na dor pela EVA foi observada na semana 4 para ambos os grupos (P < 0,0001), não havendo diferença entre eles (P=0,352). Esta melhora foi sustentada até a semana 24. Uma melhora significativa em relação à avaliação basal foi observada na avaliação global da doença pelo paciente e pelo médico, no questionário WOMAC e no índice de Lequesne, não havendo diferença entre os grupos. A melhora nos desfechos secundários de avaliação foi sustentada durante o estudo, exceto para a avaliação global da doença pelo paciente. O critério de resposta OMERACT-OARSI foi alcançado por 74% e 72% dos pacientes dos grupos TH e AM, respectivamente. Conclusão: TH e AM são igualmente eficazes na OA de joelho, e a melhora na dor e na função física pode ser sustentada por até 24 semanas / Introduction: Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections are broadly used in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), but it is unknown which of these agents is the most effective. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) and methylprednisolone acetate (MA) IA injections in knee OA. Patients and Methods: Patients with symptomatic knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence grades II or III, were randomized to receive a single IA injection with 40mg of TH or MA. Evaluations were performed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate the improvement in the patient\'s knee pain by visual analogue scale (VAS) from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes included the global assessment of the disease by the patient and the physician, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis questionnaire (WOMAC), the Lequesne index and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria of response. Generalized estimating equations with Wald statistics for type 3 contrasts and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison adjustment were employed in statistical analysis. Results: The intention-to-treat population included one hundred patients; 50 in each study arm. A significant improvement in pain by VAS was observed at week 4 for both groups (P<0.0001), with no difference between them (P=0.352). This improvement was sustained up to week 24. A significant improvement from the baseline was observed for the patients\' and the physicians\' global assessments, WOMAC questionnaire, and Lequesne index, with no differences between the groups. Improvements in the secondary outcomes were sustained during the study, except for the patients\' global assessment of disease. OMERACT-OARSI criteria of response was achieved by 74% and 72% of patients in the TH and the MA groups, respectively. Conclusion: TH and MA are equally effective in knee OA and improvement in pain and physical function can be sustained for up to 24 week

<p>Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection therapy is frequently used to relieve symptoms of arthritis, but there is considerable variation in injection routines among physicians. One issue of debate concerns the importance of synovial fluid aspiration during the injection procedure. In the present randomised controlled study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a significantly reduced risk for arthritis relapse was observed when arthrocentesis was included in the intra-articular injection procedure of the knee. </p><p>Furthermore, there is no consensus about the post-injection regimes. Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of post-injection rest of the knee, but also injection routines for other joints often include such recommendations. The present randomised controlled trial showed that 48-hour rest in elastic orthosis after intra-articular injection in the wrist did not improve the outcome. Thus, the effect of post-injection rest varies between different joints. </p><p>The improved treatment result of post-injection rest of the knee is supposed to be caused by retarded steroid resorption from the joint. In order examine the metabolic effects in cartilage, bone and the hypothalamic-piuitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis, resting and mobile RA patients were studied after intra-articular knee injections. Serum levels of the injected glucocorticoid, triamcinolone hexacetonide (THA), were analysed, as well as cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) as a marker of cartilage turnover, osteocalcin for bone formation and deoxypyridinoline for bone resorption. The HPA-axis was assessed using serum levels of cortisol and adrenocorticotropine hormone. The result showed a short term and reversible suppression of the HPA-axis and bone formation, whereas bone resorption was unaffected. No differences between mobile and resting patients were observed. In both groups reduction of COMP levels were seen, but these were significantly more pronounced in resting patients, suggesting a cartilage-protective effect. The THA levels increased similarly in both groups, indicating that rest did not affect glucocorticoid resorption. </p><p>Consequently, another explanation for the beneficial effects of postinjection rest of knee synovitis should be considered. In the present material the incidence of infectious complications of intra-articular treatment was less than 1/12,000 injections. </p><p>The findings in this thesis can be applied in the clinical practice and should be considered when new guidelines for intra-articular glucocorticoid therapy are created.</p>

Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection therapy is frequently used to relieve symptoms of arthritis, but there is considerable variation in injection routines among physicians. One issue of debate concerns the importance of synovial fluid aspiration during the injection procedure. In the present randomised controlled study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a significantly reduced risk for arthritis relapse was observed when arthrocentesis was included in the intra-articular injection procedure of the knee. Furthermore, there is no consensus about the post-injection regimes. Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of post-injection rest of the knee, but also injection routines for other joints often include such recommendations. The present randomised controlled trial showed that 48-hour rest in elastic orthosis after intra-articular injection in the wrist did not improve the outcome. Thus, the effect of post-injection rest varies between different joints. The improved treatment result of post-injection rest of the knee is supposed to be caused by retarded steroid resorption from the joint. In order examine the metabolic effects in cartilage, bone and the hypothalamic-piuitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis, resting and mobile RA patients were studied after intra-articular knee injections. Serum levels of the injected glucocorticoid, triamcinolone hexacetonide (THA), were analysed, as well as cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) as a marker of cartilage turnover, osteocalcin for bone formation and deoxypyridinoline for bone resorption. The HPA-axis was assessed using serum levels of cortisol and adrenocorticotropine hormone. The result showed a short term and reversible suppression of the HPA-axis and bone formation, whereas bone resorption was unaffected. No differences between mobile and resting patients were observed. In both groups reduction of COMP levels were seen, but these were significantly more pronounced in resting patients, suggesting a cartilage-protective effect. The THA levels increased similarly in both groups, indicating that rest did not affect glucocorticoid resorption. Consequently, another explanation for the beneficial effects of postinjection rest of knee synovitis should be considered. In the present material the incidence of infectious complications of intra-articular treatment was less than 1/12,000 injections. The findings in this thesis can be applied in the clinical practice and should be considered when new guidelines for intra-articular glucocorticoid therapy are created.