This study has aimed to investigate the new regulation of the superintendent that was introduced at the turn of the year 2019, which states that the superintendent shall assist the local politics and school boards. The overall purpose of this study is to increase knowledge about how a legal regulation of the superintendency affects school governance and management in the governance chain. Underlying issues are: how the regulation in the Education Act has been interpreted by various actors in the school area and whether the superintendents themselves believe that the regulation has affected their position and function. To investigate this, various government documents and investigations concerning the regulation of the superintendent are studied, a number of actors in the chain of command are interviewed about the new regulation and the individual opinions of the superintendents have been obtained via a survey. To put the superintedent in a context, I have highlighted theories of state governance, New Public Management and trust-based governance. To understand the superintendent arena and what governs the superintendent, I have used six dimensions of power and a framework that defines what governs the superintendent room for maneuver. The results show that the superintendent function will be affected by the new regulation. Whether the chain of command will become clearer, there are no unambiguous answers neither from those who have been interviewed nor the superintendent. On the other hand, there are several among those who have been interviewed who claim that the superintendent regulation can result in a conflict of power between, among others, local politics and the superintendent, the superintendent and the school principal. Furthermore, another issue found are difficulties with the regulation because the Swedish municipalities have different size and different organization including the difference of structure of the political boards, which affects the effects of the regulation of the superintendent.