The aim of this study is to investigate oral peer review on argumentative speech and to study the attitudes towards this peer review. The investigation was performed in an up-per secondary school class, and it focused on the different types of oral responses students give each other. In addition, the study investigated in what way the students experience this type of peer review. The results show that students reflect on form and performance as well as content, but they place more emphasis on form and performance than content. Students are positive about peer review and its importance for their progress. The investigation shows that peer review is needed, but the methods need to be developed further as response should mirror all parts of a work process, peer review can be used in other situations such as work life as well as in the teaching of other subjects.