Evolution is a most fascinating feature of all living things in our world. The means of organismal evolution are diverse, comprising mainly of natural and sexual selection. Both of these phenomena may contribute to evolutionary adaptations in health and disease. The questions of immunity impact on the process of sexual selection and sexual selection for increased anti-parasite resistance are wide issues of the present research in natural sciences. Their clarification requires multidisciplinarily-based investigation combining a variety of partial results into a single united paradigm. My co-workers and I have chosen several specific issues to study, in order to fill some of the important gaps of the current knowledge. We proposed the Carotenoid maintenance handicap hypothesis to point out that optimisation instead of maximisation of the carotenoid intake and ornamental display may be physiologically convenient for the individual. In Scarlet rosefinch (Carpodacus erythrinus) we confirmed the role of the carotenoid-based ornamental colouration in the process of sexual selection and investigated several partial aspects of the association between immunogenetics, immune function, health and the ornament expression and mate choice. In Zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) we have shown that the present way of...

Sexual ornaments important for mating success in many species are often assumed to evolve as condition-dependent signals of individual quality. Ornament expression can be associated with age and survival, thereby signalling individual viability. Here, we have tested viability signalling function of tail streamers and their importance for within-pair and extra-pair fertilisation success in the European barn swallow (Hirundo rustica rustica). In contrast to previous studies on this subspecies, our data suggest that tail length is not associated with fertilisation success in our population. Instead, the most important predictors of within-pair and extra-pair fertilisation success were female and male age, respectively. Our data supported viability signalling function of male tail streamers, as documented by age-related within- individual increase in their length. There was no evidence for senescence in this trait. Contrary to some previous studies, the viability signalling function of tail streamers was further supported by observed selective disappearance of males with shorter tails. Several physiological mechanisms have been proposed as maintaining signalling honesty. Among them, oxidative stress from highly reactive species (RS), including free radicals, attracted a considerable attention. Given...

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Bone growth can be impaired due to disease, such as osteoporosis. Currently, intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment is the only approved therapy in the United States for anabolic bone growth in osteoporosis patients. The anabolic effects of PTH treatment are due, at least in part, to modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Activation of the Wnt/ β-catenin pathway using a small molecule inhibitor of GSK3β was previously shown to increase markers of bone formation in vitro. Our study utilized a zebrafish model system to study Wnt activated fin regeneration and bone growth. Wnt signaling is the first genetically identified step in fin regeneration, and bony rays are the main structure in zebrafish fins. Thus, zebrafish fin regeneration may be a useful model to study Wnt signaling mediated bone growth. Fin regeneration experiments were conducted using various concentrations of a GSK3β inhibitor compound, LSN 2105786, for different treatment periods and regenerative outgrowth was measured at 4 and 7 days post amputation. Experiments revealed continuous low concentration (4-5 nM) treatment to be most effective at increasing regeneration. Higher concentrations inhibited fin growth, perhaps by excessive stimulation of differentiation programs. In situ hybridization experiments were performed to examine effects of GSK3β inhibitor on Wnt responsive gene expression. Experiments showed temporal and spatial changes on individual gene markers following GSK3β inhibitor treatment. Additionally, confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence labeling data indicated that the Wnt signaling intracellular signal transducer, β-catenin, accumulates throughout GSK3β inhibitor treated tissues. Finally, experiments revealed increased cell proliferation in fin regenerates following LSN 2105786 treatment. Together, these data indicate that bone growth in zebrafish fin regeneration is improved by activating Wnt signaling. Zebrafish Wnt signaling experiments provide a good model to study bone growth and bone repair mechanisms, and may provide an efficient drug discovery platform.

La résolution de problème est souvent utilisée comme outil de mesure des capacités cognitives individuelles chez les animaux non-humains, puisqu’elle permet d’étudier leurs capacités d’apprentissage opérant et d’innovation. Les capacités cognitives diffèrent selon les espèces et les individus, et leur permettent de maximiser leur aptitude. Par exemple, chez les oiseaux et les mammifères, les espèces avec de plus gros cerveaux relatifs possèderaient de meilleures capacités d’apprentissage sociale et d’innovation, qui leur permettent de mieux s’adapter à un environnement nouveau. Malgré l’utilisation répandue des diamants mandarins dans la recherche en écologie comportementale, l’impact du sexe sur la performance de résolution de problème et la répétabilité des performances ont souvent été négligés, et aucune étude, à notre connaissance, ne s’est intéressée à leur performance en contexte de résolution de problème coopérative. Dans le cadre de notre étude, nous avons décidé d’aborder ces différents aspects pour améliorer notre compréhension des capacités cognitives et de la coopération chez cette espèce modèle. Nous avons confronté des diamants mâles et femelles à trois tests de résolution de problème individuelle (test de la ficelle, test de la barre et test du couvercle) et un test de résolution de problème coopérative. Pour ce dernier, nous avons séparé les individus en deux groupes : couples sociaux et couples expérimentaux, afin de manipuler le lien social entre individus. Les couples sociaux étaient composés d’un mâle et d’une femelle ayant cohabité pendant 7 jours, alors que les couples expérimentaux étaient composés d’un mâle et d’une femelle ne s’étant jamais rencontrés auparavant. Bien que nous nous attendions à ce que le sexe n’ait pas d’impact sur la performance de résolution, nos résultats ont révélé que, en moyenne, les mâles étaient plus rapides pour résoudre un test de résolution de problème individuelle. Ces résultats étaient principalement attribuables à leur performance sur le deuxième test de résolution de problème individuelle (test de la barre). Nous pensons que cette différence pourrait être due à un niveau de persistance plus élevé chez les mâles et/ou à l’impact de la sélection sexuelle sur les performances cognitives, et que ces aspects devraient être davantage explorés dans de futures études. Ensuite, en accord avec nos attentes, nos résultats ont confirmé l’hypothèse de la répétabilité contextuelle, selon laquelle les performances de résolution sont constantes entre différentes tâches impliquant le même processus cognitif. Enfin, nous nous attendions à ce que les couples sociaux soient plus performants que les couples expérimentaux sur le test de résolution de problème coopérative, puisque nous les pensions davantage capables de synchronisation et de coordination comportementale. Or, nous avons trouvé des résultats suggérant le contraire, et nous avons constaté que la performance du couple au test de résolution de problème coopérative, était principalement expliquée par les performances de résolution individuelle de chaque partenaire. Des questions subsistent quant aux raisons pour lesquelles les couples expérimentaux ont mieux performé que les couples sociaux. Est-ce qu’une différence de motivation pourrait être à l’origine de ces résultats ? De futures études seront nécessaires pour nous éclairer. Malgré les questions en suspens, nos résultats contribuent à enrichir nos connaissances sur les capacités cognitives individuelles, la résolution de problème ainsi que la coopération. / Problem solving is often used as a tool for measuring individual cognitive abilities in non-human animals, since it enables us to study their operant learning and innovation capacities. Cognitive capacities differ between species and individuals, enabling them to maximize their abilities. For example, in birds and mammals, species with larger relative brains are said to have better social learning and innovation capacities, enabling them to adapt better to new environments. Despite the widespread use of zebra finches in behavioral ecology research, the impact of sex on problem-solving performance and the repeatability of performance have often been overlooked and, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated their performance in cooperative problem-solving contexts. In our study, we decided to address these different aspects to improve our understanding of cognitive abilities and cooperation in this model species. We tested male and female zebra finches in three individual problem-solving tests (string test, bar test and lid test) and one cooperative problem-solving test. For the latter, we separated the individuals into two groups: social pairs and experimental pairs, to manipulate the social bond between individuals. Social pairs were made up of a male and a female who had cohabited for 7 days, while experimental pairs were made up of a male and a female who had never met before. While we expected sex to have no impact on solving performance, our results revealed that, on average, males were faster at solving individual problem-solving tests. These results were mainly attributable to their performance on the second individual problem-solving test (bar test). We believe that this difference could be attributable to a higher level of persistence in males and/or the impact of sexual selection on cognitive performance, and that these aspects should be explored in future studies. Secondly, in line with our expectations, our results confirmed the contextual repeatability hypothesis, according to which solving performance is consistent across trials requiring the same cognitive process. Finally, we expected social pairs to perform better than experimental pairs on the cooperative problem-solving test, since we expected them to be more capable of synchronisation and behavioral coordination. . However, we found results suggesting the opposite, and the performance of the pairs on the cooperative problem-solving task was mainly explained by the ability of each partner to solve a problem. Questions remain as to why the experimental pairs performed better than the social pairs. Could a difference in motivation be behind these results? Future studies are needed to shed light on this. Despite the outstanding questions, we believe that our results contribute to our knowledge of individual cognitive abilities, problem solving and cooperation.