Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
BeneditaVA.pdf: 3215715 bytes, checksum: d5b8929cc44be96819172ec528bdd25f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008-04-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / In this work, the argumentative strategies construction in university entrance examinations texts is analyzed. The study intended to present, through the analyzed occurrences in the corpus, the discursive strategies use for the argumentation construction, observing the different lexicalization forms and the effects that these strategies produced for the intended meaning construction. Aiming to analyze the modalization via texts written by candidates for the UFRN entrance examination, the relations between this category and the resources used for the argumentative guidance of the text were highlighted. Conceived as a speaker argumentative strategy to express his/her relationship with the proposition content which enunciates, the modalization is, thus, one of the linguistic expression form used for the attainment of intended meaning effects in the argumentation construction. In order to substantiate the research, the theoretical assumptions adopted were the propositions which deal with this linguistic category, guiding it to a pragmatic-semantic perspective as well as a discursive-semantic one. Hence, Neves ( 1996, 2006), Koch ( 2000, 2002), Cervoni ( 1989), Bronkart (1999) and Castilho; Morais de Castilho (1996) studies, among others founded this work. Afterwards, a contextualized analysis of the modalized statements, taking into account all the set of elements implied on the argumentation construction, was carried out. The research, which had a strict qualitative character, revealed that the candidates make use of modalization to express commitment or dissociation as regards the statement which they produce; to obtain credibility and provide more authority to their arguments, thus avoiding them of being contested; to impose their arguments as real ones and acquire acceptance of the interlocutor; to lessen the proposition content and disguise the knowledge source; to comment the enunciation and attribute the discourse to another sender; to establish a dialogic relation with the interlocutor. In addition to offering support for new investigations, the research also aims to contribute for the mother tongue teaching, emphasizing the need of a focus which provides special attention to the written language functioning and its application diversity.
In this work, the argumentative strategies construction in university entrance examinations texts is analyzed. The study intended to present, through the analyzed occurrences in the corpus, the discursive strategies use for the argumentation construction, observing the different lexicalization forms and the effects that these strategies produced for the intended meaning construction. Aiming to analyze the modalization via texts written by candidates for the UFRN entrance examination, the relations between this category and the resources used for the argumentative guidance of the text were highlighted. Conceived as a speaker argumentative strategy to express his/her relationship with the proposition content which enunciates, the modalization is, thus, one of the linguistic expression form used for the attainment of intended meaning effects in the argumentation construction. In order to substantiate the research, the theoretical assumptions adopted were the propositions which deal with this linguistic category, guiding it to a pragmatic-semantic perspective as well as a discursive-semantic one. Hence, Neves ( 1996, 2006), Koch ( 2000, 2002), Cervoni ( 1989), Bronkart (1999) and Castilho; Morais de Castilho (1996) studies, among others founded this work. Afterwards, a contextualized analysis of the modalized statements, taking into account all the set of elements implied on the argumentation construction, was carried out. The research, which had a strict qualitative character, revealed that the candidates make use of modalization to express commitment or dissociation as regards the statement which they produce; to obtain credibility and provide more authority to their arguments, thus avoiding them of being contested; to impose their arguments as real ones and acquire acceptance of the interlocutor; to lessen the proposition content and disguise the knowledge source; to comment the enunciation and attribute the discourse to another sender; to establish a dialogic relation with the interlocutor. In addition to offering support for new investigations, the research also aims to contribute for the mother tongue teaching, emphasizing the need of a focus which provides special attention to the written language functioning and its application diversity / Neste trabalho, analisa-se a constru??o de estrat?gias argumentativas em textos de vestibulandos. O estudo procurou demonstrar, por meio das ocorr?ncias analisadas no corpus, o emprego de estrat?gias discursivas para a constru??o da argumenta??o, observando as diferentes formas de lexicaliza??o e os efeitos que essas estrat?gias produziram para a constru??o do sentido pretendido. Com o objetivo de analisar a modaliza??o a partir de textos constru?dos por candidatos ao concurso vestibular da UFRN, procurou-se evidenciar rela??es entre essa categoria e outros recursos utilizados para a orienta??o argumentativa do texto. Concebida como uma estrat?gia argumentativa do falante para expressar seu relacionamento com o conte?do da proposi??o que enuncia, a modaliza??o ? uma das formas de express?o ling??stica utilizada para obten??o de efeitos de sentidos pretendidos na constru??o da argumenta??o. Para embasar a pesquisa, adotaram-se como pressuposto te?rico os postulados que tratam dessa categoria ling??stica, inserindo-a numa perspectiva sem?ntico-pragm?tica e numa perspectiva sem?ntico-discursiva. Para tanto, serviram de base os estudos de Neves (1996; 2006), Koch (2000; 2002), Cervoni (1989), Bronkart (1999), e Castilho; Morais de Castilho (1996) entre outros. Procedeu-se a uma an?lise contextualizada dos enunciados modalizados, considerando todo o complexo de elementos implicados na constru??o da argumenta??o. A pesquisa, que teve car?ter estritamente qualitativo, revelou que os candidatos fazem uso da modaliza??o para expressar compromisso ou afastamento em rela??o ao enunciado que produzem; para obter credibilidade e conferir mais autoridade a seus argumentos, evitando que sejam contestados; para impor seus argumentos como verdadeiros e obter aceita??o do interlocutor; para atenuar o conte?do das proposi??es e camuflar a fonte de conhecimento; para comentar a enuncia??o e atribuir o discurso a outro enunciador; para estabelecer uma rela??o dial?gica com o interlocutor. Al?m de oferecer suporte para novas investiga??es, a pesquisa tamb?m procura contribuir para o ensino de l?ngua materna, enfatizando a necessidade de um enfoque que privilegie o funcionamento da linguagem escrita e sua diversidade de aplica??es
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/16135 |
| Date | 08 April 2008 |
| Creators | Andrade, Benedita Vieira de |
| Contributors | CPF:78975301834, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4708857E2, Alves, Maria da Penha Casado, CPF:24162906491, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7377731555637172, Silva Neto, Jo?o Gomes da |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos da Linguagem, UFRN, BR, Lingu?stica Aplicada; Literatura Comparada |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds