Return to search

取消財務預測強制公開揭露制度之資本市場反應 / The capital market reaction to the abolishment of mandated financial forecast

財務預測相較於歷史性財務報表而言,其決策之攸關性較大。我國自民國80年5月起開始實施強制性財務報表迄今,已成為資本市場中相當重要的訊息,惟隨著我國證券市場規模逐步擴大,公司面臨之經濟環境日趨複雜,為符合國際作法及實務需要,故行政院金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局於93年12月9日依據證券交易法第三十六條之一,發布金管證六字第930005938號函,修正財務預測制度改採自願公開方式(並得以簡式或完整式方法擇一為之),並參考國外有關預測性資訊公開之相關規定及實務運作方式,配合相關配套措施,以增進資本市場效率及決策品質。
  宣告取消財務預測強制公開揭露制度後,實證結果顯示:(1)對股價會產生一負向的效果,有顯著的負向異常報酬產生,且消息提前反應於市場上;在交易量方面,有顯著異常增加的情形發生。(2)對資訊特性不同分組採單變量分析,結果顯示公司規模及分析師人數可解釋宣告效果大小,兩組之間均達顯著水準。(3)公司規模越大時,股價反應越小,顯示公司規模與宣告異常報酬率間呈負向關係,亦即規模效果存在;但交易量反應越大。(4)分析師人數越多時,股價反應越小;但交易量反應越大,且較少分析師人數公司來得顯著。 / Financial forcast is more relevant than historical financial statements. Our country began to implement the mandatory financial forcast since May, 1991, has already become a very important information in the capital market. While the economic environment becoming complicated, in order to meet international practices, so on December 9, 1993, change the firm can dicide disclosure their financial forcast by themselves, in order to promote the efficiency of capital market and decision quality.
The empirical results show that:(1) For stock price, it will produce negative effect; on the other hand, trading volume is significant increaseing. (2) For groups with different level of information characteristics, the results show that firm size and the number of ananlysts can explain that declaring effect. (3) When the size of firm is larger, the stock price is smaller; but the trading volume is larger. (4) The number of analysts is larger, the response of stock price is smaller; but the trading volume is larger in response.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0093353025
Creators周美慧, Chou, Mei - Hui
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0014 seconds