Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-08-18T14:07:45Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_JULIANA_LEDUR_STUCKY_PARCIAL.pdf: 191289 bytes, checksum: d62dfe740e7837fe9e5cc301f8f8ab38 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-18T14:07:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_JULIANA_LEDUR_STUCKY_PARCIAL.pdf: 191289 bytes, checksum: d62dfe740e7837fe9e5cc301f8f8ab38 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-03-10 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This paper prepared as part of the researches conducted by the Research Group Prejudice,
Vulnerability and Psychosocial Process of the Psychology School of the Pontif?cia
Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul ? PUCRS, had the goal to evaluate the grades of
prejudice against sexual and gender diversity within 28 public schools of 12 cities located in 4
Brazilian states. In this paper, it were considered the manners which prejudice is expressed by
teachers, staff and students, and the form that the prejudice is shown in relation to the social
demographics variables researched in those three categories of subjects. The sample was
based on 413 teachers, 97 employees and 1.829 high school students that answered a selfexplanatory
questionnaire with social demographic data, duly reviewed by the Prejudice
against Sexual and Gender Diversity scales. The questionnaire was composed by 16 items that
inquired about prejudice against sexual and gender diversity, and the Bogardus scale of social
distance adapted to investigated the relation among gays, lesbian, travesties and transexuals.
Individuals that declared to be religious or followers of the evangelic religion in the three
groups of study presented a higher rate of prejudice than the other variables. The participation
in any training, class or course related to gender, sexuality or sexual diversity decreases the
prejudice variable in the three groups of study. Individuals that affirmed to have homosexual
(gays and lesbians) friends, relatives or acquaintances in the groups of teachers and students
presented a lower level of prejudice compared to the ones that declared to not have
relationship with people with such characteristics. To assist individuals that are part of
Brazilian education institutions to think about multiple sexual and gender orientations is the
first step to propose institutional, pedagogical and methodological changes in schools.
Campaigns and political actions that foster the problem of the prejudice, their risks and
damages for current and future generations is also fundamental for the search of a more equal
society in relation to the individual rights and obligations. / Este estudo, realizado na Faculdade de Psicologia da Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio
Grande do Sul, junto ao grupo de pesquisa Preconceito, Vulnerabilidade e Processos
Psicossociais da unidade da Psicologia Social, teve como principal objetivo avaliar o grau de
preconceito contra as diversidades sexuais e de g?nero em 28 escolas p?blicas localizadas em
12 cidades de 4 estados brasileiros. Foram consideradas a maneira como o preconceito ?
expressado pelos/as professores/as, funcion?rios/as e estudantes, e a forma como o
preconceito mostra-se em rela??o ?s vari?veis sociodemogr?ficas pesquisadas nessas tr?s
categorias de sujeitos. A amostra trabalhou com 413 professores/as, 97 funcion?rios/as e
1.829 estudantes de ensino m?dio que responderam um question?rio autoaplic?vel com dados
demogr?ficos, a vers?o revisada da escala Preconceito contra Diversidade Sexual e de
G?nero, composta por 16 itens, que investiga o preconceito contra diversidade sexual e de
g?nero, e a Escala de Dist?ncia Social de Bogardus, adaptada para investigar a rela??o com
gays, l?sbicas, travestis e transexuais. Pessoas que se consideraram religiosas e praticantes da
religi?o evang?lica, nos tr?s grupos investigados, apresentaram maior grau de preconceito que
as outras vari?veis. Ter participado de algum treinamento, aula ou curso relacionado ?
identidade de g?nero, sexualidade ou diversidade sexual diminui a frequ?ncia da vari?vel
preconceito, nos tr?s grupos investigados. Pessoas que afirmaram possuir amigos/as, parentes
ou conhecidos/as homossexuais (gays ou l?sbicas), travestis ou transexuais, nos grupos de
professores/as e alunos/as, apresentaram menor grau de preconceito que aquelas que
responderam n?o se relacionar com nenhuma dessas pessoas. Auxiliar as equipes que
integram as institui??es de ensino brasileiras a pensar as m?ltiplas orienta??es sexuais e de
g?nero ? o primeiro passo para propor mudan?as pedag?gicas e metodol?gicas nas escolas. A
realiza??o de campanhas e pol?ticas que fomentem a problematiza??o da discrimina??o, seus
riscos e preju?zos para gera??es presentes e futuras ? fundamental, tamb?m, na busca por uma
sociedade mais justa e equiparada nos direitos e obriga??es individuais.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7619 |
Date | 10 March 2017 |
Creators | Stucky, Juliana Ledur |
Contributors | Costa, ?ngelo Brandelli |
Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Psicologia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Relation | 2588426296948062698, 600, 600, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, 3411867255817377423, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds