Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-09-17T11:35:59Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
474956 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 469346 bytes, checksum: f15ea2cde698c78bb976a96cf66f6af1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-17T11:35:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
474956 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 469346 bytes, checksum: f15ea2cde698c78bb976a96cf66f6af1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-08-27 / Daily violations of fundamental rights of persons deprived of liberty in Brazil, emulated by a grotesque scenario of overcrowding in prisons, in spite of a solid legal framework founder of protections, associated with paralysis of successive governments and the parliament, leading to the question about whether they would be justiciable. Being clear that there is a special subjection relationship of the prisoner in the face of the State, which figure as your guarantor, and that the Constitution will be to govern the hand of the judge, the affirmation of justiciability comes naturally. Touches him checking not only the existence of formal condition to prison (i.e., a valid incarceration title), but, overcoming the traditional look, also the existence of material conditions to prison (i.e., humanitarian practicability of imprisonment, in loco, in the prison unit - in accordance with fundamental rights). In the US, the Supreme Court issued a paradigmatic judgment in the area, in Brown vs. Plata (2011), ordering the release of prisoners in California due to overcrowding and inherent violations. In Brazil, the ADPF in the collective via, and the HC in the individual via, are possible actions to search tutelage. Among the resulting statements which can not invade the sphere of action of the elected branches of government, under penalty of improper judicial activism, the temporary suspension of imprisonment is an alternative limit, also in view of the principle of unsurpassable prison capacity. / Di?rias viola??es dos direitos fundamentais das pessoas privadas de liberdade no Brasil, emuladas por um grotesco cen?rio da superlota??o dos pres?dios, a despeito de um s?lido quadro normativo instituidor de prote??es, associadas ? paralisia de governos sucessivos e do parlamento, levam ? pergunta sobre se seriam justici?veis. Estando claro que h? uma especial rela??o de sujei??o do preso em face do Estado, que figura como seu garantidor, e de que a Constitui??o Federal haver? de governar a m?o do juiz, a afirma??o da justiciabilidade surge naturalmente. Toca a ele a verifica??o n?o s? da exist?ncia de condi??o formal para a pris?o (i.e., de um t?tulo de encarceramento v?lido), mas, em supera??o do olhar tradicional, tamb?m da exist?ncia de condi??es materiais para a pris?o (i.e., da exequibilidade humanit?ria do encarceramento, in loco, na unidade prisional em conformidade com os direitos fundamentais). Nos EUA, a Suprema Corte emitiu julgamento paradigm?tico na ?rea, em Brown vs. Plata (2011), ordenando a soltura de prisioneiros no Estado da Calif?rnia devido a superlota??o e viola??es inerentes. No Brasil, a ADPF na via coletiva, e o HC na via individual, s?o a??es poss?veis para busca de tutela. Dentre os pronunciamentos resultantes, que n?o podem invadir a esfera de atua??o dos ramos eleitos do Governo, sob pena de indevido ativismo judicial, a suspens?o provis?ria do encarceramento surge como alternativa limite, tamb?m em vista do princ?pio da capacidade prisional taxativa.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6312 |
| Date | 27 August 2015 |
| Creators | Oliveira, Rodrigo Moraes de |
| Contributors | Feldens, Luciano |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds