Return to search

Influence of Nrf2 Activators and Keap1 Inhibitors on Antioxidative Phenotypes of THP-1-Derived M1 and M2 macrophages: Therapeutic Potential for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

POPULAR SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is not your average disorder. It behaves like a mischievous troublemaker, wreaking havoc throughout the body, causing inflammation that affects multiple organs. SLE presents a puzzle that keeps health care professionals worldwide intrigued, searching for answers amidst its complex of immunologic manifestations and clinical symptoms. While we’ve made progress in understanding SLE, its specific cause remains a mystery. What we do know is that SLE triggers a fascinating interplay between genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors in susceptible individuals. Macrophages, specialized white blood cells, can be likened to moody actors on a stage wearing different masks and wielding functional props. Among them are M1 macrophages, fiery troublemakers who provoke pro-inflammatory responses, and M2 macrophages, peacemakers striving for balance by generating anti-inflammatory responses. Then there is NRF2, the vigilante, normally held by its captor, KEAP1. However, when cells stress NRF2 manages to break free from KEAP1 and spring into action, embarking on a crucial journey into the cell nucleus where DNA is stored. Once inside, NRF2 binds specific regions of the DNA, promoting genes associated with protective activities, including antioxidative responses and detoxification processes, thereby shielding cells from further harm. Now, let us envision a therapeutic strategy that utilizes this; if we can deliberately unleashNRF2 on command, triggering a powerful cascade of antioxidative responses throughout the body,such a treatment would offer tremendous promise and serve as a paradigm for patients sufferingfrom chronic inflammation. But the question remains: Is it possible? In this study, we investigated the effects of certain chemicals on macrophages in a controlledlab environment. Our goal was to explore their potential for therapeutic purposes. Excitingly, wediscovered that these chemicals can indeed influence macrophages to produce a stronger antiinflammatory and antioxidant response. These findings could be promising for developing futuretreatments, especially in patients diagnosed with conditions such as SLE. / ABSTRACT Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifaceted, chronic autoimmune disorder that leads to inflammation and affects various organs. A wide range of immunologic manifestations and clinical symptoms characterizes SLE. While the specific cause remains unknown, it is thought to result from a combination of genetic susceptibility and the intricate interplay between environmental and hormonal factors. A significant subset of SLE patients also experience renal manifestation, lupus nephritis (LN), characterized by distinct inflammatory responses in which macrophages play a role. Macrophages exhibit different functional characteristics depending on their environment, and generally display two contrasting phenotypes; M1, which elicits proinflammatory responses, and M2, which generates anti-inflammatory responses Homeostasis is vital, yet environmental stress is inevitable. NRF2, a transcription factor known for its involvement in oxidative stress response, plays a pivotal role. Under basal conditions, NRF2 resides in the cytoplasm and is targeted for degradation by the protein KEAP1. However, during cellular stress, the NRF2-KEAP1 complex dissociates, allowing NRF2 to translocate into the nucleus where it binds specific regulatory regions of genes that promote cytoprotective activities. The NRF2 pathway has gained attention as a potential target for therapeutic strategies in inflammatory conditions, including SLE. This study aimed to assess the effects of certain chemical NRF2 activators and a KEAP1 inhibitor on an in vitro model of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization. The objective was to investigate whether these compounds could enhance antioxidative response. To evaluate this, key genes and proteins involved in antioxidative pathways were analyzed. Gene expression was assessed using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and protein presence was determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The findings of this study indicate that stimulation of macrophage subgroups with the selected compounds promotes a shift towards anti-inflammatory and antioxidative response. / <p>Rektor tilldelade Leo Svahn stipendie Österby för <em>välartade obemedlade studier</em>.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-508311
Date January 2023
CreatorsSvahn, Leo
PublisherUppsala universitet, Institutionen för immunologi, genetik och patologi, University Medical Center Groningen
Source SetsDiVA Archive at Upsalla University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeStudent thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text
Formatapplication/pdf
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds