本論文屬於國族建構的個案研究,探討19世紀烏克蘭的民族運動發展歷程。由歷史意識的關切出發,採用捷克歷史社會學家赫洛荷的民族運動理論作為分析架構,鋪陳出歷史、文化與政治的三階段發展歷程。在內容論述上,挑選12位最具代表性的烏克蘭知識份子,以列傳形式帶出19世紀烏克蘭民族運動的發展歷程。同時輔以知識分子的文本,以分析19世紀以來烏克蘭國族意識的興起與開展、及其對今日烏克蘭社會的影響。
本論文除緒論與結論外,共分為四個部分。首先,由歷史溯源,爬梳9世紀基輔羅斯以來的烏克蘭歷史,找尋烏克蘭國族的根源;其次,進入烏克蘭國族意識的萌芽階段,探討烏克蘭人如何透過傳統的發明與歷史的詮釋,創建出想像中的共同體價值;再次,隨著國族意識與民族運動逐漸開展,具規模性的文化活動與團體組織,亦不斷深化烏克蘭民族存在的正當性;復次,民族運動來到政治動員與國家構築階段,創建實體的政治黨派與政府,不但是凝聚烏克蘭國族的必要手段,更成為完成國族建構的必經之路。結論針對問題的緣起做出回應,並反思19世紀以來的國族運動經驗對照今日的烏克蘭國族認同問題。 / This thesis provides a case study of nation-building. Initiated by the concern of historical consciousness, it aims at analyzing the developing process of Ukrainian national movement in the 19th century. Applying the theoretical framework by Czech historian/sociologist Miroslav Hroch, it divides the national movement course into 3 phases (i.e. historical, cultural and political). Furthermore, biographical ketches contribute to a holistic analysis of the 19th century Ukrainian national movement as a whole.
This study is divided into four parts. First, it traces back to the historical root of Ukrainian nation from the time of Kyivan Rus’. Second, it investigates how Ukrainians created the imagined community by inventing a common tradition and re-interpreting the history. Third, as the national consciousness grows, cultural and organizational activities contribute to strengthen the Ukrainian national idea in the mid-19th century. Fourth, political means such as regime establishment was employed by the eve of the Revolutionary times. In conclusion, it proposes feedbacks and reflections to re-consider the national identity problem in today’s Ukraine.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0982530051 |
Creators | 徐裕軒, Hsu, Yu Hsuan |
Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
Language | 中文 |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0581 seconds