Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-06-01T14:24:42Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_TIAGO_PORTO_PEREIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 867936 bytes, checksum: 9c840869662255f7dab4bdd19316c525 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-01T14:24:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_TIAGO_PORTO_PEREIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 867936 bytes, checksum: 9c840869662255f7dab4bdd19316c525 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-22 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / The Modern Age provided the Philosophy with a wide number of influential thinkers, whose theories keep actual until nowadays. Among these notorious authors was Jean-Jacques Rousseau, remarkable by the volont? g?n?rale concept. Nevertheless, the expression was not created by him and has been used with diverse purposes since Samuel Pufendorf. Therefore, what the Citizen of Geneva in fact made was the appropriation of the expression and its secularization, attitude that revolutionized the political thinking by removing the power of the ruler and laying it amongst the citizens. Almost 240 years have passed since Rousseau?s death and both society and politics became more complex. With the arrival of the Internet and the strengthening of the network society, governance forms that employ digital platforms began to be discussed by theorists from distinct fields of knowledge. Amid the several political models thus emerged, the digital democracy arises with the promise of promoting an environment suitable for the citizen?s participation. Considering these facts, the present work sought to investigate the general will?s idea in two moments: first, since the concept?s genesis until Rousseau; second, how the constitutive elements of the volont? g?n?rale are found in John Rawls? philosophy and in the digital democracy. Therefore, our intent is to understand how the concept could keep itself present until now, showing how the Citizen of Geneva?s theory still dialogues with us on the XXI century. / A Modernidade ofereceu ? Filosofia um grande n?mero de influentes pensadores cujas teorias at? os dias de hoje se mant?m atuais. Dentre esses c?lebres autores figurou Jean-Jacques Rousseau, famoso sobretudo pelo conceito de volont? g?n?rale. Entretanto, o termo n?o foi cria??o sua, sendo usado com fins diversos desde Samuel Pufendorf. Dessa forma, o que o Cidad?o de Genebra de fato realizou foi a apropria??o do termo e sua seculariza??o, atitude que revolucionou o pensamento pol?tico ao retirar o poder do governante e deposit?-lo nas m?os dos cidad?os. Quase 240 anos se passaram desde a morte de Rousseau e tanto a sociedade quanto a pol?tica se complexificaram. Com o advento da Internet e da consolida??o de uma sociedade em rede, formas de governan?a a partir das plataformas digitais come?aram a ser debatidas por te?ricos dos mais distintos campos do saber. Dentre os v?rios modelos pol?ticos assim surgidos, desponta a democracia digital com a promessa de promover um ambiente prop?cio para a participa??o cidad?. Considerando esses dados, o presente trabalho busca investigar a ideia de uma vontade geral em dois momentos distintos: inicialmente, desde a g?nese do conceito at? Rousseau; em seguida, como os elementos que constituem a volont? g?n?rale s?o encontrados na filosofia de John Rawls e na democracia digital. A nossa inten??o ?, portanto, compreender como o conceito pode se manter presente at? a atualidade, demonstrando como a teoria do Cidad?o de Genebra ainda dialoga conosco no s?culo XXI.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6723 |
| Date | 22 March 2016 |
| Creators | Pereira, Tiago Porto |
| Contributors | Bavaresco, Agemir |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 600, 600, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053, -2555911436985713659 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds