Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:21:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Vianey Mreis Lopes Junior.pdf: 327076 bytes, checksum: 06ef2cf33fc3f1ef76da6f643d9f461d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-10-17 / The present paper intends to demonstrate the victim´s historical position in the penal
process and their evolution as a character in the penal process, starting at the time of
their greatest protagonism, with the revenge, up to their present situation at the time
of the State´s monopoly, where the victim must be supported by the State and
compensated by the delinquent for the crime.
We intend to demonstrate that the victim, under the protection of the Rule of Law
and the Principle of the Dignity of the Human Being, which are eternity clauses in the
federal Constitution of 1988 and guiding lines of this study, in face of the moral and
material damages suffered as a result of the crime needs to have those damages,
both moral and material, repaired, the delinquent being required to do so as well as
the State, which must provide the conditions for their total rehabilitation.
The study of the legislative reform introduced by Law 11.719/2008, interpreted under
the constitutional realm, supported by principles and jurisprudence, still incipient,
proves those aspects with their clear re-valuation, in this context.
Furthermore, we point out the need for extensive action by the Criminal Court, which
had added to its scope of actions the ascertainment of the defendant´s responsibility
as related to the victim´s damages, with no offense to the already accomplished
constitutional principles of the penal process, and the need for the consequent
determination of an effective compensation so that the victim´s claims can be
satisfied, so that the international treaties can be validated, and so that the civil court
can be released of the extra burden of unnecessary filing for new requests of
compensation / O presente trabalho analisa a posição da vítima ao longo da história, ora como
principal protagonista do processo, ora afastada e substituída pelo Estado Juiz.
A Constituição Federal de 1988, ao eleger o Estado Democrático de Direito sob a luz
do Princípio da Dignidade Humana após estabelecer inúmeras garantias, revalorizou
a vítima da criminalidade violenta, trazendo explicitamente a obrigação de amparo e
assistência.
A vítima foi revalorizada por extensa legislação ordinária posterior à Constituição e
finalmente com a Lei 11.719/2008 de 11/06 de 2008 que tratou de sua indenização
em sede do Juízo Criminal, na busca por reparação de danos sofridos em virtude do
crime.
A reparação agora determinada pelo Juízo Criminal com evidente intenção de
celeridade e eficiência, aferindo o dano e estipulando a indenização, com evidente
alargamento de sua competência. Neste diapasão ainda estuda-se a forte corrente
que gradativamente propõe ser o Estado concorrente e solidário na responsabilidade
pela reparação dos danos decorrentes dos danos sofridos pela vítima oriundos da
criminalidade violenta
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:leto:handle/5982 |
| Date | 17 October 2012 |
| Creators | Lopes Junior, Vianey Mreis |
| Contributors | Pereira, Claudio José Langroiva |
| Publisher | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, PUC-SP, BR, Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, instacron:PUC_SP |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds