Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-06-18T12:03:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
470806 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 594844 bytes, checksum: 13a8320d85aa95f4a242505ee468acba (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-18T12:03:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
470806 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 594844 bytes, checksum: 13a8320d85aa95f4a242505ee468acba (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-08-29 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Introduction: The use of questionnaires for the diagnosis of sleep disorders in children has increased significantly both in the scientific field and in the clinical practice.
Objective: To identify the available and validated questionnaires for assessment of sleep in the pediatric population.
Methodology: The potential eligible studies published up to June 2014 were identified from a search at Medline, Embase, LILACS, Scielo and Doaj. The search was conducted using a combination of the following terms: (Sleep OR Apnea) AND Questionnaires. Scientific papers that used questionnaires to assess sleep in pediatric population with unrestricted period of publication and language were included. Exclusion criteria were articles that were not related to the pediatric population and also those which did not use sleep assessment questionnaire for this population.
Results: Out of the 8,266 articles identified, 8,168 were excluded for two main reasons: not working with the pediatric population or not presenting a questionnaire to assess sleep. Thus, 98 articles were fully analyzed with 105 questionnaires that assessed sleep in pediatric population. From these studies, it was possible to identify 64 different scales that assess sleep disorders in children and adolescents. All of the questionnaires evaluated (n = 105), 70 (67%) were valid. The most commonly cited instruments in the literature were CSHQ (Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire), PSQ (Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire), SDSC (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), PDSS (Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale), SHS (Sleep Habits Survey), MEQ (Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire), and ISQ (Infant Sleep Questionnaire). These scales were cited in more than 50% of the papers. In the evaluation of the quality criteria of the instruments, the less presented in the studies were the responsiveness and test-retest agreement.
Conclusion: There are, in the literature, validated questionnaires for all age groups to assess pediatric sleep which are of easy accessibility and applicability. However, it is still necessary to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments, since many scales applied in the clinical practice have no major validation criteria for their usefulness. / Introdu??o: O uso de question?rios para o diagn?stico dos dist?rbios do sono em pediatria tem aumentado expressivamente tanto no meio cient?fico, quanto na pr?tica cl?nica. Objetivo: Identificar os question?rios dispon?veis e validados para avalia??o do sono em popula??o pedi?trica.
Metodologia: Os potenciais estudos eleg?veis publicados at? junho de 2014 foram identificados a partir da pesquisa nas bases de dados Medline, Embase, LILACS, Scielo e Doaj. A pesquisa foi realizada utilizando a combina??o dos seguintes termos: (Sleep OR Apnea) AND Questionnaires. Foram inclu?dos artigos cient?ficos que utilizaram question?rios para avaliar o sono na popula??o pedi?trica, sem restri??es de per?odo de publica??o e l?ngua. Os crit?rios de exclus?o foram artigos que n?o trabalhavam com popula??o pedi?trica e tamb?m aqueles que n?o apresentavam question?rios de avalia??o do sono nessa popula??o.
Resultados: Do total de 8266 de artigos identificados, 8168 foram exclu?dos por dois principais motivos: n?o trabalhavam com popula??o pedi?trica ou n?o apresentavam um question?rio para avaliar sono. Desta forma, foram avaliados 98 artigos na ?ntegra com 105 question?rios que avaliavam sono em uma popula??o pedi?trica. A partir da an?lise desses estudos, foi poss?vel identificar 64 escalas distintas que avaliam dist?rbios do sono em crian?as e adolescentes. Do total de question?rios avaliados (n=105), 70 (67%) foram validados. Os instrumentos mais citados na literatura foram CSHQ (Children?s Sleep Habits Questionnaire), PSQ (Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire), SDSC (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), PDSS (Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale), SHS (Sleep Habits Survey), MEQ (Morning-Eveningness Questionnaire) e ISQ (Infant Sleep Questionnaire). Essas escalas s?o citadas por mais de 50% dos artigos revisados. Na avalia??o dos crit?rios de qualidade dos instrumentos, os menos apresentados nos estudos foram os de responsividade e concord?ncia teste-reteste.
Conclus?o: H? na literatura question?rios validados para todas as faixas et?rias para avaliar o sono pedi?trico, de f?cil acessibilidade e aplicabilidade, mas ainda ? necess?rio avaliar as qualidades psicom?tricas dos instrumentos, pois muitas escalas aplicadas na pr?tica cl?nica n?o possuem crit?rios de valida??o importantes para a sua utilidade.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6148 |
| Date | 29 August 2014 |
| Creators | Costa, Carlice Franciane Lima da |
| Contributors | Mattiello, Rita |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Medicina/Pediatria e Sa?de da Crian?a, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Medicina |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3098206005268432148, 600, 600, 600, 600, -8624664729441623247, -969369452308786627, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds