本研究旨在建構國民小學校園閒置空間永續發展評估指標及權重體系，作為推動校園閒置空間再利用之參考依據。研究以文獻分析為基礎，初擬校園閒置空間永續發展評估指標，採專家問卷、模糊德爾菲問卷和層級分析法問卷為研究工具進行調查。研究對象共22位專家學者，資料分析首先利用改良「雙三角模糊數」之模糊德爾菲整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選評估因子，最後運用Expert Choice 2000軟體進行統計分析以建立各項指標之權重，完成國民小學校園閒置空間永續發展評估指標。
本研究獲得主要結論如下：國民小學校園閒置空間永續發展評估指標，含3大層面、8大指標共30個評估因子，其整體權重高低排序如下：
一、三大層面依權重高低排序為：環境面（41.5％）、經濟面（30.8％）、 社會面（27.7％）。
二、八大指標依權重高低排序為：價值效益（17.4％）、生態保育（15.5％）、健康環境（14.4％）、綠色消費（13.4％）、永續經營（12.4％）、環境規劃（11.6％）、社會教育的功能（11.2％）、社區發展（4.1％）。
三、三十個評估因子依權重高低排序前五名為：校舍動靜分區配置（9.1％）、保水設施（5.6％）、基地開發之干擾及衝擊（5.4％）、生物多樣性（5.4％）、室內物理環境（5.3％）。
最後，本研究依據研究結果提出建議，提供未來行政單位檢視校園閒置空間再利用評估及結果的有效性的參考。 / A Study of Evaluation Indicators on Sustainable Development for Vacant School Space in Elementary Schools
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation indicators and their associated priority weights on sustainable development for elementary vacant school space. The results of the study can be the reference for promoting the reuse of vacant school space. At first, the study is based on the analysis of documents to establish relevant evaluation indicators about vacant school space. And this study adopts three research methods: expert survey, Fuzzy Delphi and AHP to survey.
The research invites 22 education-related experts to form a team as the study object. First, in order to select the applicable indicators, the individual answers of experts are analyzed by “double triangle fuzzy technique”. By using this technique, opinions about important indicators evaluated by experts are integrated; and meantime, the factors are screened. Finally, Expert Choice 2000 software is used to process statistic analysis to set up priority weights of various indicators. In this way, the evaluation indicators on sustainable development for elementary vacant school space are established.
The main conclusion which this study obtained is as follows:
The evaluation indicators of sustainable development for elementary vacant school space include three dimensions, eight indicators, and thirty evaluation factors. The priority weights of all evaluation indictors are described in order as follows:
1.The priority weights of three dimensions are environmental dimension（41.5％）, economical dimension（30.8％）, and social dimension（27.7％）
2.The priority weights of eight indicators are valuing benefit（17.4％）, ecological conservation（15.5％）, healthy environment（14.4％）, green consumption（13.4％）, sustainable development management（12.4％）, environmental planning（11.6％）, the function of social education（11.2％）, and community development （4.1％）。
3.The priority weights of thirty evaluation factors are the allocation of noisy and quiet areas of school（9.1％）, facilities of water content（5.6％）, the disturbance and impact of the development about vacant school space（5.4％）, ecological variety（5.4％）, and biological surroundings indoors（5.3％）.
Finally, according to the research results, some suggestions are offered to educational administration to review the effects and evaluation results of reusing vacant school space in the future.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0095171010 |
| Creators | 張詩欣 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds