Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-07-01T21:18:48Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
471590 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 399268 bytes, checksum: 811650fee8352c7477a6f3dfc7117912 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-01T21:18:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
471590 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 399268 bytes, checksum: 811650fee8352c7477a6f3dfc7117912 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-08-29 / Introduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation has been indicated for lung transplant candidates as a preventive and therapeutic intervention to improve patients? functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation on functional capacity and quality of life of patients in the waiting list or who have already been transplanted. Methodology: The potential eligible studies published until June 2014 were identified through a database search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pedro, Web of Science, and in reference of the articles. The search was conducted using a combination of the following terms: ?Pulmonary Rehabilitation? AND ?Lung Transplant? OR ?Lung Transplant Candidates?. Trials which the intervention consisted of pre and/or postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation programs were included. Articles that the rehabilitation included only nutritional and/or drug and/or psychosocial interventions; research that did not have pulmonary rehabilitation as the main focus and that were related to other transplanted organs; and even the ones that did not differentiate the results obtained by the transplanted organ were excluded. The main study outcomes were functional capacity and health-related quality of life, survival was shown as a secondary one. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles regarding their eligibility criteria. A third reviewer determined the inclusion of items in situations of disagreement between the other reviewers. The quality criteria of the articles were assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) instrument and in evidence-based medicine. Results: Seven articles were included in this systematic review, totaling 314 patients with a mean age of 32.5 years. There was an increase on average of 47.6 meters in the 6-minute walk test for preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation programs and 122 meters in the postoperative rehabilitation program. The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) increased, on average, 0.41 in postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation programs using cycle ergometers. The domains of physical and mental health of the SF-36 questionnaire had significant increases in the preoperative period. There was significant improvement in all domains of the SF-36 with the postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation program. The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) was mentioned in just one article in the postoperative period which showed improvement in dyspnea with an increase of 0.6 points. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective intervention for both pre and post-lung transplantation. The findings suggest significant changes in functional capacity and quality of life of these patients. Methodologically, the studies should provide accurate and valid data for pre and postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation. New clinical trials on the benefits of rehabilitation should be started, keeping the concern with ethics, randomization, homogeneous groups and the logistical challenges of such tests. / Introdu??o: A reabilita??o pulmonar tem sido indicada para os pacientes candidatos a transplante pulmonar como uma interven??o preventiva e terap?utica para a melhora da capacidade funcional e da qualidade de vida. Objetivo: avaliar os benef?cios da reabilita??o pulmonar na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida em pacientes em lista de espera ou transplantados pulmonar. Metodologia: Os potenciais estudos eleg?veis publicados at? junho 2014 foram identificados a partir da pesquisa nas bases de dados MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pedro, Web of Science e na lista de refer?ncias dos artigos. A pesquisa foi realizada utilizando a combina??o dos seguintes termos: ?Pulmonary Rehabilitation? AND ?Lung Transplant? OR ?Candidates Lung Transplant?. Foram inclu?dos ensaios cl?nicos que a interven??o consistiu em programas de reabilita??o pr? e/ou p?s-transplante pulmonar. Foram exclu?dos os artigos que a reabilita??o incluiu apenas interven??es nutricionais e/ou medicamentosa e/ou psicossociais; pesquisas que n?o trouxessem a reabilita??o pulmonar como enfoque principal e que se relacionaram a outros ?rg?os transplantados, ou ainda que n?o diferenciaram os resultados obtidos por ?rg?o transplantado. Os desfechos principais do estudo foram ? capacidade funcional e a qualidade de vida relacionada ? sa?de sendo a sobrevida o desfecho secund?rio. Dois revisores analisaram independentemente artigos quanto aos crit?rios de elegibilidade. Um terceiro pesquisador definiu a inclus?o dos artigos em situa??es de discord?ncia entre os revisores. Os crit?rios de qualidade dos artigos foram avaliados mediante instrumento QUADAS e na medicina baseada em evid?ncias. Resultados: Sete artigos foram inclu?dos na presente revis?o sistem?tica, totalizando 314 pacientes com idade m?dia de 32,5 anos. Houve um aumento em m?dia de 47,6 metros no Teste de Caminhada de 6 Minutos os programas de reabilita??o pr?-pulmonar e 122 metros no programa p?s- reabilita??o. O consumo de oxig?nio de pico (VO2 peak) aumentou em m?dia em 0,41 nos programas de reabilita??o p?s-transplante, atrav?s de cicloerg?metros. Os dom?nios de sa?de f?sica e mental do question?rio SF-36 obtiveram aumentos significativos no per?odo pr?-transplante. Houve melhora significativa em todos os dom?nios do SF-36 com o programa de reabilita??o p?s-transplante pulmonar. Apenas 1 artigo utilizou o question?rio Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) no per?odo p?s-transplante pulmonar, que referenciou melhora apenas no quesito dispneia com um aumento de 0,6 pontos. Conclus?o: A reabilita??o pulmonar ? uma interven??o efetiva para o manejo tanto pr? quanto p?s-transplante pulmonar. Os achados encontrados sugerem mudan?as relevantes na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida desses pacientes. Metodologicamente, os estudos devem prover dados precisos e v?lidos para a reabilita??o pulmonar pr? e p?s-transplante. Novos ensaios cl?nicos sobre os benef?cios da reabilita??o devem ser iniciados, mantendo a preocupa??o com a ?tica, a randomiza??o, em rela??o aos grupos homog?neos e com os desafios log?sticos desses ensaios.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6194 |
| Date | 29 August 2014 |
| Creators | Pires, Bruna Souza Vargas |
| Contributors | Mattiello, Rita |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Medicina/Pediatria e Sa?de da Crian?a, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Medicina |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3098206005268432148, 600, 600, 600, -8624664729441623247, -969369452308786627 |
Page generated in 0.0131 seconds