AbstractThis paper seeks to answer how well the unit managers in a community live up to itsresponsibility for rehabilitation. What opportunities and obstacles center managersfeel that they have in the rehabilitation process and their expertise in rehabilitationare adequate. The essay is based on qualitative, in which six interviews wereconducted to help capture the Heads of Unit subjective experiences. Five of therespondents are heads of units in the elderly, and an interview with therehabilitation coordinator of the municipality. Respondents' comments and relevantliterature form the basis for this essay. Analysis has been done with the help of roletheory and specifically theater theory. Theatre theory can be compared to aprofessional role, as they are commonly prescribed roles on how a person should actprofessionally and that they should leave the role when they go off the stage. Theresults show that it came mainly from two perspectives. For one thing, some of theunit heads an attitude that rehabilitation coordinator "take over" rehabilitationliability after an investigation stalled, although they are primarily responsible for coworkers.Stated that they have primary responsibility for the employee. The otherperspective that emerged of the result is that the unit managers often have dualroles. Then they will both be controlling managers and a care person that caresabout its employees.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:mau-25557 |
| Date | January 2012 |
| Creators | Karlsson, Ann-Sofie |
| Publisher | Malmö högskola, Fakulteten för hälsa och samhälle (HS), Malmö högskola/Hälsa och samhälle |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds