Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-12-26T16:39:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_ALEXANDRE_MUSSOI_MOREIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 812946 bytes, checksum: c316150f64139bafa5a6efea1b888305 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-26T16:39:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_ALEXANDRE_MUSSOI_MOREIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 812946 bytes, checksum: c316150f64139bafa5a6efea1b888305 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-10-24 / The present work aims to determine the possibility of an ethical-moral approach to the juridical thought, by taking the abortion act in the views of Dworkin and Finnis as its analysis object. This assessment evidences the impossibility of any elaboration of the juridical reasoning in a way free from the moral-ethical questions, for the simple application of the positive juridical norms. In a current context of tension between the juridical-legal questions and those typically ethical-moral questions, which is not a novelty in the history of humanity, the regulation of this relation according to the criterion of the common good is the materialization itself of the justice in law. The ethical life is, in its intersubjective ambit, fair life (life in justice), which is sought by the law. The demands of the contemporary citizens regarding their rights, especially when concerns their individual choices (to be entitled to decide to have children, and when to have them; the right on his own body, et al), have been maintaining heated discussions which wrap up moral and ethical concepts. This study answers to the need of an ethical-moral approach of the juridical reasoning, placing the natural law as option of overcoming of the legal positivism. By using the comparative dialectical method, it has been made an option of assessing the thoughts of Ronald Dworkin and John Finnis, since both of them represent a change of a hermeneutic matrix which surpasses the separation between right and moral, from which the lawfulness refers to the moral-ethical correction of the action practiced by someone (in the specific case examined in this work, the abortion). With a jusnaturalist position, Finnis completely preclude the lawfulness of the act of abortion, whilst Dworkin admits exceptions to that, in what he is closer to the dominant position of the present civilization, which, regrettably, has been engaged in erasing any conception on the unconditional respect to life. / O presente trabalho busca determinar a possibilidade de abordagem ?tico-moral no racioc?nio jur?dico, tomando o ato de aborto na vis?o de Dworkin e Finnis como objeto de an?lise. Essa aprecia??o evidencia a impossibilidade de elabora??o do pensamento jur?dico de forma desvinculada das quest?es ?tico-morais, pela simples aplica??o das normas jur?dicas positivadas. Em um contexto atual, de tens?o existente
entre as quest?es jur?dico-legais e as de natureza ?tico-morais, que n?o ? novidade na hist?ria da humanidade, regular essa rela??o segundo o crit?rio do bem comum ? a pr?pria materializa??o da justi?a em lei. A vida ?tica ?, em seu ?mbito intersubjetivo, vida justa (vida na justi?a), o que ? objetivado pelo direito (lei). As demandas dos cidad?os contempor?neos em rela??o a seus direitos, especialmente no que diz respeito ?s suas escolhas individuais (o direito de decidir ter filhos, e quando t?-los; o direito sobre o pr?prio corpo, entre outros), t?m mantido vivas discuss?es que envolvem conceitos morais e ?ticos. Neste estudo, responde-se ? necessidade de uma abordagem ?tico-moral do pensamento jur?dico, trazendo o jusnaturalismo como op??o de supera??o do juspositivismo. Ao utilizar o m?todo dial?tico comparativo, fez-se a op??o pela aprecia??o do pensamento de Dworkin e Finnis, uma vez que ambos representam uma mudan?a de matriz hermen?utica, mudan?a essa que supera a separa??o entre direito e moral, a partir da qual a licitude se refere ? corre??o ?tico-moral da a??o praticada (no caso espec?fico contemplado neste trabalho, o aborto). Com uma posi??o jusnaturalista, Finnis afasta completamente a licitude do ato de aborto, ao passo que Dworkin admite exce??es, no que se aproxima mais da posi??o dominante da civiliza??o atual que, lamentavelmente, tem se encarregado de apagar qualquer concep??o sobre o respeito incondicionado ? vida.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7109 |
| Date | 24 October 2016 |
| Creators | Moreira, Alexandre Mussoi |
| Contributors | Souza, Draiton Gonzaga de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 600, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds