Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-21T13:55:35Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_JOEDSON DE SANTANA OLIVEIRA.pdf: 873384 bytes, checksum: 4f8b6fb215b400b90618bdb9d07d9034 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-06-06T19:00:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_JOEDSON DE SANTANA OLIVEIRA.pdf: 873384 bytes, checksum: 4f8b6fb215b400b90618bdb9d07d9034 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-06T19:04:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_JOEDSON DE SANTANA OLIVEIRA.pdf: 873384 bytes, checksum: 4f8b6fb215b400b90618bdb9d07d9034 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-27 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This study establishes a dialogue between the neo-Roman republicanism of Philip Pettit and the critical theory of Axel Honneth. The discussion revolves around the theme ?freedom? and its developments. I sought, during the research, to list elements that allowed me to sustain that freedom as non-domination, formulated by Petit, suffers from a social deficit. Therefore, I proposed that some categories from Honneth?s critical theory could enrich the language of republicanism, namely, the notion of recognition, social pathology, and the theoretical-methodological model of normative reconstruction. Petit?s theoretical undertaking advances a lot in the construction of a concept of freedom, understood as non-domination, especially in the criticism of liberalism, and yet Petit sticks to an analytic description of the phenomenon of domination, losing sight of the potential for social criticism that the concept of non-domination entails. Consequently, Petit formulated a model of democratic participation qua contestation, whose basic assumption is a strictly juridical conception of the person. This assumption results in a deflation of the notion of people and turns the republicanism weak from the sociological point of view. I argue, together with John McCormick, that Pettit?s republicanism loses the socioeconomic cleavage given by Machiavelli and ends up being refractory to the social dimension of the conflict. I present, in turn, Honneth?s critical theory as an alternative to what I call the sociological deficit of the republican theory. Finally, I outline a criticism of the Brazilian national state in the light of critical theory and, at the same time, raise some questions about republicanism?s and critical theory?s potential to offer answers to Brazilian social dilemmas. / Este trabalho estabelece uma interlocu??o entre o republicanismo neorromano de Philip Pettit e a teoria cr?tica de Axel Honneth. A discuss?o empreendida gira entorno do tema da liberdade e seus respectivos desdobramentos. Procurei no decorrer da pesquisa elencar elementos que me permitiram sustentar que a liberdade como n?o-domina??o formulada por Pettit padece de um d?ficit social. Por conseguinte, sugeri que algumas categorias da teoria cr?tica de Honneth poderiam enriquecer a linguagem do republicanismo, a saber, a no??o de reconhecimento, patologia social e o modelo te?rico-metodol?gico de reconstru??o normativa. O empreendimento te?rico de Pettit avan?a muito na constru??o de um conceito de liberdade entendida como n?o-domina??o, especialmente na cr?tica ao liberalismo, por?m, Pettit fica preso a uma descri??o anal?tica do fen?meno da domina??o, perdendo de vista o potencial de cr?tica social que o conceito de n?o-domina??o enseja. Como consequ?ncia disso Pettit formula um modelo de participa??o democr?tica, na forma de contesta??o, cujo pressuposto de base ? uma concep??o estritamente jur?dica de pessoa. Tal pressuposto resulta em um esvaziamento da no??o de povo e deixa o republicanismo fraco do ponto de vista sociol?gico. Argumento, junto com John McCormick, que o republicanismo de Pettit perde a clivagem socioecon?mica dada por Maquiavel e acaba sendo refrat?rio ? dimens?o social do conflito. Apresento na sequ?ncia a teoria cr?tica de Honneth como alternativa ao que chamo aqui de d?ficit sociol?gico da teoria republicana. Por fim, fa?o uma cr?tica ao estado nacional brasileiro ? luz da teoria cr?tica e, ao mesmo tempo, levanto ligeiros questionamentos sobre o potencial do republicanismo e da teoria cr?tica oferecerem respostas aos dilemas sociais do Brasil.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8108 |
| Date | 27 March 2018 |
| Creators | Oliveira, Joedson de Santana |
| Contributors | Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hil?rio Fernandes de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 500, 500, 500, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds