Return to search

Ponto de vista e responsabilidade enunciativa em senten?as de pedido de fal?ncia

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-28T18:59:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-28T20:50:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-28T20:50:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-05 / O objetivo geral de nossa tese ? estudar o ponto de vista (PDV) e a responsabilidade enunciativa (RE) no g?nero discursivo senten?a judicial de pedido de fal?ncia. O estudo do PDV e da RE foram realizados numa perspectiva textual-enunciativa, pela qual toma a enuncia??o como fator de constru??o do sentido do texto (coes?o enunciativa). Estabelecemos como objetivos espec?ficos identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar marcas lingu?sticas no texto a partir das categorias textuais e enunciativas selecionadas. Nossa investiga??o insere-se em um contexto de estudos do discurso jur?dico no ?mbito das ci?ncias da linguagem, um campo de estudos ainda pouco explorado, mas que a cada dia recebe mais aten??o dos investigadores. A pesquisa situa-se na linha de estudos lingu?sticos do texto, tomando como base te?rica a An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD), conforme a proposta de Adam (2011), decorrente da Lingu?stica do Texto e da Lingu?stica da Enuncia??o. Dessa forma, nosso quadro te?rico focaliza quatro eixos gerais (texto, g?nero, enuncia??o e discurso) e duas categorias de an?lises (PDV e RE). Adotamos a concep??o de g?nero do discurso de Bakhtin (1996), a qual ? seguida por Adam (2011), igualmente por outros te?ricos, como, por exemplo, Bazerman (2006) e Miller (2012). Os estudos do Ponto de Vista (PDV) e da Responsabilidade Enunciativa (RE), desenvolvidos por Rabatel (2008, 2009, 2013, 2015), s?o adotados como base te?rica geral da an?lise da enuncia??o e do que postulamos como ?opera??es textuais de constru??o do ponto de vista?. O corpus da pesquisa ? constitu?do por 13 senten?as judiciais decorrentes do pedido de fal?ncia de um credor contra um devedor. A realiza??o da investiga??o tomou como par?metro de an?lise a constru??o textual do PDV do juiz (L1/E1) acerca da decreta??o de fal?ncia do r?u (e3) pedida pelo autor (e2). A an?lise do corpus aponta como resultado que a constru??o do PDV pelo juiz ? realizada por diversos mecanismos lingu?sticos, textuais e discursivos, os quais mostram que a RE, ora ? assumida pelo L1/E1, ora imputando essa responsabilidade a outros enunciadores, especialmente os enunciadores: autor e r?u. Ainda se verificara a ocorr?ncia de uso de quadros mediativos (GUENTCH?VA, 1994, 1996, 2011, 2014), por meio dos quais o juiz n?o assume a RE pelo conte?do proposicional, imputando-a a outros enunciadores. Observamos, a partir da constru??o do PDV do juiz (L1/E1), a recorr?ncia da assun??o da RE pelo juiz (L1/E1), nas se??es de fundamenta??o e de dispositivo, enquanto no relat?rio predomina a imputa??o. Na perspectiva da coes?o enunciativa proposta pela nossa tese, foi verificado que o PDV do juiz ? constru?do, na dimens?o do acordo-desacordo, de maneira vari?vel conforme cada parte do plano de texto da senten?a judicial (neutralidade no relat?rio; realiza??o de acordo/desacordo na fundamenta??o; realiza??o ou de acordo ou de desacordo no dispositivo). Por fim, a realiza??o do acordo ? feita nessas senten?as, em muitos casos, por mecanismos de coconstru??o do PDV (coenuncia??o, sobrenuncia??o e subenuncia??o) entre o juiz e enunciadores segundos, mecanismos esses que se manifestam predominantemente na parte da fundamenta??o da senten?a judicial. / The main objective of our doctoral thesis is to study the point of view (PDV) and commitment in the discursive genre judicial sentence concerning bankruptcy of companies. The study of the PDV and commitment was carried out in a textual-enunciative perspective, by which it takes the enunciation as a factor of construction of the sense of the text (enunciative cohesion). We set as specific objectives of our research to identify, describe, analyze and interpret linguistic marks in the text from the selected textual and enunciative categories. Our research is part of a study of legal discourse in the field of language sciences, a field of studies that is still little explored, but which receives more and more attention from researchers every day. The research is based on the linguistic studies of the text, based on the Textual Analysis of Speeches (ATD), as proposed by Adam (2011), derived from Text Linguistics, and based on Linguistics of Enunciation. In this way, our theoretical framework focuses on four general axes (text, gender, enunciation and discourse) and two categories of analysis (PDV and Commitment). We adopt Bakhtin's (1996) conception of discourse genre, which is followed by Adam (2011), also by other theorists, such as Bazerman (2006) and Miller (2012). Rabatel's (2008, 2009, 2013, 2015) studies about Point of View (PDV) and Commitment studies are adopted as the general theoretical basis of the enunciation analysis and what we postulate as "textual construction of point of view". The corpus of the investigation is constituted by 13 judicial sentences resulting from the filing of bankruptcy by a creditor against a debtor. The investigation was based on the textual construction of the judge's decision (L1 / E1) on the defendant's decree of bankruptcy (e3) requested by the author (e2). The analysis of the corpus points out that the construction of the PDV by the judge is carried out by several linguistic, textual and discursive mechanisms, which show that the Commitment is sometimes assumed by L1 / E1, sometimes imputing this responsibility to other enunciators, especially the enunciators: author and defendant. The use of mediated frameworks (GUENTCH?VA, 1994, 1996, 2011, 2014) has been verified, whereby the judge does not assume the Commitment for propositional content and impute it to other enunciators. It was observed from the construction of the judge?s PDV (L1 / E1) that there was a recurrence of the assumption of Commitment by the judge (L1 / E1), in the legal substantiation and issue of orders section while in the facts section the imputation predominates. In the perspective of the enunciative cohesion proposed by our thesis, it was verified that the judge's PDV is constructed, in the dimension of the agreement-disagreement, in a variable way according to each part of the text plan of the judicial sentence (neutrality in the facts section; agreement or disagreement in the legal substantiation section; performance or agreement or disagreement in the issue of orders section). Finally, the agreement is made in these sentences in many cases by mechanisms of co-construction of the PDV (co-enunciation, super-enunciation and sub-enunciation) between the judge and second enunciators, mechanisms that are manifested predominantly in the part of legal substantiation section of the judicial sentence.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/22503
Date05 December 2016
CreatorsLanzillo, Anderson Souza da Silva
Contributors44405243468, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1239053356970371, Silva Neto, Jo?o Gomes da, 78975301834, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6754214478770594, Passeggi, Luis Alvaro Sgadari, 40598195491, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4021473858264190, Xavier, Yanko Marcius de Alencar, 42413524487, http://lattes.cnpq.br/2551909246317077, Silva, Celia Maria Medeiros Barbosa da, 35831286487, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4710381196001278, Pinto, Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza, 50938754734, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7146169670785034, Rodrigues, Maria das Gra?as Soares
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds