Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:20:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
462123.pdf: 2355690 bytes, checksum: da3bab7a666aea50975fb9b2a3689298 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-08-12 / The central theme of this study is to analyze the implementation of Reference Centres for Social Assistance (CRAS) in the town of Crickhowell, with a view to assessing Protective Services and Full Service Family (PAIF), the discussion of social assistance category is necessary, family and territory. It discusses the historical percussion of social welfare policy. It discusses the historical process of social assistance policy, highlighting some periods, such as the Federal Constitution of Brazil in 1988, the Organic Law of Social Assistance (LOAS) in 1993, until the term of the National Policy for Social Assistance establishing the System single Social Assistance (ITS) in 2004. Soon we discussed families, territory, Protective Services for Comprehensive Care of Family (PAIF), and the dilemmas and possibilities in strategies to work with families from the territory as a space for participation, but also of contradiction and following with a brief presentation of the diagnosis in the town of Crickhowell and then analyzing the results. This study constituted a qualitative exploratory research, anchored in the deductive method. The research is subject four coordinators Reference Centres for Social Assistance and the municipal manager of social welfare policy, addressed through recorded interviews and forms. The content analysis is based upon the study of Moraes (2007). The survey results point to a weakness in the materialization of social assistance rights in the territories of CRAS, as well as regarding the implementation, extreme weaknesses in contractual relationships, single statement of policy, human resources, continuing education of workers, ineffectiveness forward demands, turnover professional, technical and political weakness in the framework of the professionals as well as limits on the break and possibilities of conservative welfare arsenal, this historically in social welfare policy. The considerations of this study indicate difficulties and limitations in the management of CRAS front and the demand in the territories, on the other hand, technical direction and weakened the political materialization of working with families through Protective Services and Full Service Family (PAIF). / O tema central do presente estudo ? analisar a implementa??o dos Centros de Refer?ncia de Assist?ncia Social (CRAS) no munic?pio de Crici?ma, com vistas a avaliar o Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF), sendo necess?ria a discuss?o da categoria assist?ncia social, fam?lia e territ?rio. Discute-se a processo hist?rico da pol?tica de assist?ncia social, destacando alguns per?odos, como da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Federativa do Brasil em 1988, a Lei Org?nica de Assist?ncia Social (LOAS) em 1993, at? a vig?ncia da Pol?tica Nacional de Assist?ncia Social que institui o Sistema ?nico de Assist?ncia Social (SUAS) em 2004. Dialogamos sobre fam?lia, territ?rio, o Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF), os dilemas e possibilidades nas estrat?gias de trabalho com fam?lias a partir do territ?rio como espa?o de participa??o, mas tamb?m de contradi??o e seguindo com breve apresenta??o do diagn?stico no munic?pio de Crici?ma e posteriormente a an?lise dos resultados. Este estudo se constituiu numa pesquisa qualitativa de car?ter explorat?rio, ancorada no m?todo dedutivo. A pesquisa tem como sujeitos quatro coordenadores de Centros de Refer?ncia de Assist?ncia Social e o gestor municipal da pol?tica de assist?ncia social, abordados atrav?s de entrevistas gravadas e formul?rios. A an?lise ? a de conte?do, baseada no estudo de Moraes (2007). Os resultados da pesquisa apontam para uma fragilidade na materializa??o dos direitos socioassistenciais nos territ?rios de CRAS, bem como em rela??o ? implementa??o, extremas fragilidades nas rela??es contratuais, comando ?nico da pol?tica, recursos humanos, educa??o permanente dos trabalhadores, inoper?ncia frente ?s demandas, rotatividade profissional, fragilidade no arcabou?o t?cnico e politico dos profissionais, bem como limites nas possibilidades ruptura do arsenal conservador e assistencialista, presente historicamente na pol?tica de assist?ncia social. As considera??es deste estudo apontam dificuldades e limita??es na gest?o do CRAS e frente ?s demanda nos territ?rios, por outro lado, direcionamento t?cnico e pol?tico fragilizado na materializa??o do trabalho com fam?lias atrav?s do Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/578 |
| Date | 12 August 2014 |
| Creators | Borges, Karla Cardoso |
| Contributors | Guimar?es, Gleny Terezinha Duro |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Servi?o Social, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Servi?o Social |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -5042336829439580540, 500, 600, 1550256503942391725 |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds