Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:27:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 458188.pdf: 1437843 bytes, checksum: e258fb99ba826b8fbd61376bd34d1a0a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03-11 / This research aims to analyze the impact that has the Cash Transfer Program with Conditionalities, popularly known as Bolsa Fam?lia Program in emigration flows of microregions of Brazil. The Bolsa Fam?lia program is the most important social policy with the broadest coverage that the Brazilian government has implemented lately. This program consists in a monthly cash transfer to the most vulnerable sectors of the population. Quantifying the effect of the program in emigration is performed using the average treatment effect on the beneficiaries in the condition of being a migrant or not. Two algorithms are used in the methodology of propensity score matching (PSM) using data from the 2010 Population Census. The results show that there is a negative and significant impact of the Bolsa Fam?lia Program in emigration flows. / O objetivo deste estudo ? analisar o impacto que tem o Programa de Transfer?ncia de Renda com Condicionalidades, popularmente conhecido como Programa Bolsa Fam?lia nos fluxos emigrat?rios das microrregi?es do Brasil. O programa Bolsa fam?lia ? a mais importante pol?tica social, e com maior abrang?ncia, do governo brasileiro que consiste em uma transfer?ncia de renda mensal para os setores mais vulner?veis da sociedade. A quantifica??o do efeito do programa na emigra??o ? realizada atrav?s do efeito m?dio do tratamento sobre os benefici?rios na condi??o de ser migrante ou n?o. Dois algoritmos de pareamento s?o utilizados na metodologia de Pareamento pelo Escore de Propens?o ou Propensity Score Matchig (PSM) empregando dados do Censo Demogr?fico 2010. Os resultados mostram que existe um impacto negativo e significativo do programa Bolsa Fam?lia nos fluxos emigrat?rios.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:20:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 455912.pdf: 2774099 bytes, checksum: e4b9db48c63f0192a0d24a7d7f467c07 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-01-20 / This dissertation has as its theme the Bolsa Fam?lia?s Program (BFP) in the municipality of Esteio/RS, and the relationship between public policies of social welfare, education and health derived from conditionalities and the challenges towards the construction of intersectionality. It is proposed to systematize the results of a research conducted in 2013, which had the overall objective of verifying whether the conditionalities of BFP potentiate the intersectionality between public policies of social welfare, education and health from the experiences brought by beneficiary families and by workers and managers involved the actions of the program in the municipality of Esteio/RS. With a critical dialectic perspective, this qualitative study, with contributions of quantitative data provides references related to this topic, the historical background of the PBF and its relationship with the social question, the prospect of targeting, conditionalities and intersectionality. Had as research subjects: four women's legal guardian of the beneficiary families of BFP, three workers and three managers of policies involved the PBF. Among the key findings are the sociodemographic characteristics of families benefiting from the program based on the systematization of the analysis of quantitative data from CAD?NICO and PBF. In their qualitative part, we used the content analysis technique, which allowed the emergence of perceptions, experiences and opinions of the three segments addressed. Among the families and their relationship with the program, the data indicates the bureaucracy in access , the waiting time for the benefit, the demand for oversight of the program, and the conditionalities as an affirming element of the division of labor based on gender , their perceptions of conditionalities of the program, crossed by precariousness as a manifestation of structural violence, among the segment of workers, the concern with dependence on money, generating autonomy and emancipation in the program, a look of accountability arises from families as responsible for their conditions of poverty , the yearning for further actions and the need to define the services provided. Also the experience of the precariousness of the lack of human resources and infrastructure. On the positive side, there is the bond with the families and the possibility of prevention of diseases related to nutritional status. Between managers: understand that the PBF contributes in income generation and responsibility of families. Compliance with the counterparts, one finds the concept of BFP as a program in motion and perceive advances, as on the school frequency. Regarding health, there is the understanding that greater accountability of family health teams for family support and intensification of actions is required. On the positive side, emerges the idea that the BFP seeks a transformative perspective and overcome welfarism. Such analysis of these results indicate the need for further development and qualification of the relationship between public policies related to BFP , in the context of managing and implementing the program as well as related to the families benefiting from the program. / A presente disserta??o tem como tema o Programa Bolsa Fam?lia (PBF) no munic?pio de Esteio/RS, a rela??o entre as pol?ticas p?blicas de Assist?ncia Social, Educa??o e Sa?de a partir das condicionalidades e os desafios que se colocam ? constru??o da intersetorialidade. Prop?e-se a sistematizar os resultados de uma pesquisa realizada no ano de 2013, que teve por objetivo geral verificar se as condicionalidades do PBF potencializam a intersetorialidade entre as pol?ticas p?blicas de Assist?ncia Social, Educa??o e Sa?de a partir das experi?ncias trazidas por fam?lias benefici?rias e por trabalhadores e gestores implicados ?s a??es do programa no munic?pio de Esteio/RS. Numa perspectiva cr?tico-dial?tica, o estudo de car?ter qualitativo, com aportes de dados quantitativos, traz referenciais relativos ao tema, os antecedentes hist?ricos do PBF e a sua rela??o com a quest?o social, a perspectiva da focaliza??o, as condicionalidades e a intersetorialidade. Teve como sujeitos da pesquisa quatro mulheres respons?veis legais das fam?lias benefici?rias do PBF, tr?s trabalhadoras e tr?s gestoras das pol?ticas implicadas ao PBF. Dentre os principais resultados: uma caracteriza??o sociodemogr?fica das fam?lias benefici?rias do programa, sistematizando a an?lise dos dados quantitativos, a partir do CAD?NICO e PBF. Em sua parte qualitativa, utilizou-se a t?cnica de an?lise de conte?do, que propiciou a emers?o de percep??es, viv?ncias e opini?es dos tr?s segmentos abordados. Dentre as fam?lias e sua rela??o com o programa, apontam-se a burocracia no acesso, o tempo de espera pelo benef?cio, a demanda por fiscaliza??o do programa, as condicionalidades como elemento afirmador da divis?o do trabalho baseado no g?nero e as suas percep??es quanto ?s condicionalidades do programa, atravessada por precariedades, numa manifesta??o da viol?ncia estrutural. Dentre o segmento dos trabalhadores, surge a preocupa??o com a depend?ncia em rela??o ao benef?cio, com a gera??o de autonomia e emancipa??o em rela??o ao programa, um olhar de responsabiliza??o das fam?lias benefici?rias pela condi??o de pobreza, o anseio pela amplia??o das a??es, a necessidade de qualificar os servi?os prestados e, ainda, a viv?ncia das precariedades da falta de recursos humanos e infraestrutura. Como aspectos positivos, h? o v?nculo com as fam?lias e a possibilidade de preven??o de doen?as ligadas ? condi??o nutricional. Dentre as gestoras, h? o entendimento de que o PBF contribui para a renda e para a responsabiliza??o das fam?lias. Quanto ao cumprimento das contrapartidas, constata-se a concep??o do PBF como um programa em movimento e percebem avan?os, como na quest?o da infrequ?ncia escolar. No que tange ? Sa?de, h? o entendimento de que ? necess?ria maior responsabiliza??o das equipes de Sa?de da fam?lia para o acompanhamento familiar e a intensifica??o de a??es. Como aspecto positivo, emerge a ideia de que o PBF busca uma perspectiva transformadora e supera??o do assistencialismo. Tais resultados da an?lise indicam, como desafios, a necessidade de aprofundamento e qualifica??o da rela??o entre as pol?ticas p?blicas ligadas ao PBF em ?mbito de gest?o e execu??o do programa, bem como destas com as fam?lias benefici?rias do programa.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DaniellaMC_DISSERT.pdf: 1692550 bytes, checksum: e212e3f341ea3787c7d8be0581fc73e4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-28 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / This study aims to verify the impact of the Bolsa Fam?lia Program (BFP) in income and school attendance of poor Brazilian families. It is intended to also check the existence of a possible negative effect of the program on the labor market, titled as sloth effect. For such, microdata from the IBGE Census sample in 2010 were used. Seeking to purge possible selection biases, methodology of Quantilic Treatment Effect (QTE) was applied, in particular the estimator proposed by Firpo (2007), which assumes an exogenous and non-conditional treatment. Moreover, Foster- Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) index was calculated to check if there are fewer households below the poverty line, as well as if the inequality among the poor decreases. Human Opportunity Index (HOI) was also calculated to measure the access of young people / children education. Results showed that BFP has positively influenced the family per capita income and education (number of children aged 5-17 years old attending school). As for the labor market (worked hours and labor income), the program showed a negative effect. Thus, when compared with not benefiting families, those families who receive the BFP have: a) a higher family income (due to the shock of the transfer budget money) b) more children attending school (due to the conditionality imposed by the program); c) less worked hours (due to sloth effect in certain family groups) and d) a lower income from work. All these effects were potentiated separating the sample in the five Brazilian regions, being observed that the BFP strongly influenced the Northeast, showing a greater decrease in income inequality and poverty, and at the same time, achieved a greater negative impact on the labor market / Este estudo tem como objetivo verificar o impacto do Programa Bolsa Fam?lia (PBF) na renda e na frequ?ncia escolar das fam?lias pobres brasileiras. Pretende-se, ainda, verificar a exist?ncia de um poss?vel efeito negativo do programa no mercado de trabalho, intitulado como efeito-pregui?a. Para tanto, foi utilizado os microdados do Censo amostral do IBGE em 2010. Visando expurgar poss?veis vieses de sele??o, aplicou-se a metodologia do Efeito Quant?lico do Tratamento (EQT), em especial o estimador proposto por Firpo (2007), no qual assume um tratamento ex?geno e n?o condicional. Ademais, foi calculado o ?ndice Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) para verificar se h? menos domic?lios abaixo da linha de pobreza, bem como se a desigualdade entre os pobres diminui. Foi calculado, ainda, o ?ndice de Oportunidades Humanas (IOH) para medir o acesso de jovens/crian?as educa??o. Os resultados mostraram que o PBF influenciou positivamente a renda familiar per capita e a educa??o (n?mero de filhos de 5 a 17 anos que frequentam a escola). Quanto ao mercado de trabalho (horas trabalhadas e renda do trabalho), o programa mostrou um efeito negativo. Assim, quando comparada com as fam?lias n?o beneficiadas, aquelas fam?lias que recebem o PBF possuem: a) uma maior renda familiar (devido ao choque or?ament?rio do repasse monet?rio); b) mais filhos frequentando a escola (devido ? condicionalidade imposta pelo programa); c) menos horas trabalhadas (devido ao efeito-pregui?a em alguns grupos familiares) e; d) uma menor renda oriunda do trabalho. Todos esses efeitos foram diferenciados ao separar a amostra nas cinco regi?es brasileiras, sendo observado que o PBF influenciou mais fortemente o Nordeste e a zona rural, que mostraram um maior impacto negativo no mercado de trabalho e, ao mesmo tempo, obteve uma maior diminui??o da desigualdade de renda e pobreza

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:20:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 462123.pdf: 2355690 bytes, checksum: da3bab7a666aea50975fb9b2a3689298 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-12 / The central theme of this study is to analyze the implementation of Reference Centres for Social Assistance (CRAS) in the town of Crickhowell, with a view to assessing Protective Services and Full Service Family (PAIF), the discussion of social assistance category is necessary, family and territory. It discusses the historical percussion of social welfare policy. It discusses the historical process of social assistance policy, highlighting some periods, such as the Federal Constitution of Brazil in 1988, the Organic Law of Social Assistance (LOAS) in 1993, until the term of the National Policy for Social Assistance establishing the System single Social Assistance (ITS) in 2004. Soon we discussed families, territory, Protective Services for Comprehensive Care of Family (PAIF), and the dilemmas and possibilities in strategies to work with families from the territory as a space for participation, but also of contradiction and following with a brief presentation of the diagnosis in the town of Crickhowell and then analyzing the results. This study constituted a qualitative exploratory research, anchored in the deductive method. The research is subject four coordinators Reference Centres for Social Assistance and the municipal manager of social welfare policy, addressed through recorded interviews and forms. The content analysis is based upon the study of Moraes (2007). The survey results point to a weakness in the materialization of social assistance rights in the territories of CRAS, as well as regarding the implementation, extreme weaknesses in contractual relationships, single statement of policy, human resources, continuing education of workers, ineffectiveness forward demands, turnover professional, technical and political weakness in the framework of the professionals as well as limits on the break and possibilities of conservative welfare arsenal, this historically in social welfare policy. The considerations of this study indicate difficulties and limitations in the management of CRAS front and the demand in the territories, on the other hand, technical direction and weakened the political materialization of working with families through Protective Services and Full Service Family (PAIF). / O tema central do presente estudo ? analisar a implementa??o dos Centros de Refer?ncia de Assist?ncia Social (CRAS) no munic?pio de Crici?ma, com vistas a avaliar o Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF), sendo necess?ria a discuss?o da categoria assist?ncia social, fam?lia e territ?rio. Discute-se a processo hist?rico da pol?tica de assist?ncia social, destacando alguns per?odos, como da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Federativa do Brasil em 1988, a Lei Org?nica de Assist?ncia Social (LOAS) em 1993, at? a vig?ncia da Pol?tica Nacional de Assist?ncia Social que institui o Sistema ?nico de Assist?ncia Social (SUAS) em 2004. Dialogamos sobre fam?lia, territ?rio, o Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF), os dilemas e possibilidades nas estrat?gias de trabalho com fam?lias a partir do territ?rio como espa?o de participa??o, mas tamb?m de contradi??o e seguindo com breve apresenta??o do diagn?stico no munic?pio de Crici?ma e posteriormente a an?lise dos resultados. Este estudo se constituiu numa pesquisa qualitativa de car?ter explorat?rio, ancorada no m?todo dedutivo. A pesquisa tem como sujeitos quatro coordenadores de Centros de Refer?ncia de Assist?ncia Social e o gestor municipal da pol?tica de assist?ncia social, abordados atrav?s de entrevistas gravadas e formul?rios. A an?lise ? a de conte?do, baseada no estudo de Moraes (2007). Os resultados da pesquisa apontam para uma fragilidade na materializa??o dos direitos socioassistenciais nos territ?rios de CRAS, bem como em rela??o ? implementa??o, extremas fragilidades nas rela??es contratuais, comando ?nico da pol?tica, recursos humanos, educa??o permanente dos trabalhadores, inoper?ncia frente ?s demandas, rotatividade profissional, fragilidade no arcabou?o t?cnico e politico dos profissionais, bem como limites nas possibilidades ruptura do arsenal conservador e assistencialista, presente historicamente na pol?tica de assist?ncia social. As considera??es deste estudo apontam dificuldades e limita??es na gest?o do CRAS e frente ?s demanda nos territ?rios, por outro lado, direcionamento t?cnico e pol?tico fragilizado na materializa??o do trabalho com fam?lias atrav?s do Servi?o de Prote??o e Atendimento Integral ? Fam?lia (PAIF).