Submitted by PPG Hist?ria (historia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-02-01T19:09:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - GEANDRA DENARDI MUNARETO.pdf: 3432489 bytes, checksum: 8509b149cb20ed032e00e4edcf6f23f7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-02-07T11:42:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - GEANDRA DENARDI MUNARETO.pdf: 3432489 bytes, checksum: 8509b149cb20ed032e00e4edcf6f23f7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-02-07T11:47:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - GEANDRA DENARDI MUNARETO.pdf: 3432489 bytes, checksum: 8509b149cb20ed032e00e4edcf6f23f7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-12-28 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The objective of this work is to analyze the association between Eugenics and Authoritarianism in the works of Belis?rio Penna, Renato Kehl, Oliveira Vianna and Azevedo Amaral, not only related to the diagnoses of national problems, but also in their projects for the future. They saw not only the disorganization of the nation as a problem to be solved, but also the inability of the ruling elites to perceive them, proposing appropriate solutions, as well as the impossibility of an inferiorized, sick and dysgenic population in providing means for the country achieve prosperity. Eugenics and Authoritarianism appear as solutions that would enable the long-awaited path to progress and modernity, but its effectiveness would depend on a joint action between these two proposals, as that alone they would not be able to overcome the three main causes of national backwardness: race, elites, and political-institutional organization. / O seguinte trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a associa??o entre Eugenia e Autoritarismo nas obras de Belis?rio Penna, Renato Kehl, Oliveira Vianna e Azevedo Amaral, n?o s? relativos aos diagn?sticos dos problemas nacionais, mas tamb?m em seus projetos de futuro. Todos eles n?o s? veem a desorganiza??o da na??o como um problema a ser solucionado, mas tamb?m a inabilidade das elites dirigentes em perceb?-los, propondo solu??es adequadas, bem como a impossibilidade de uma popula??o inferiorizada, doente e disg?nica em proporcionar meios para que o pa?s alcan?asse a prosperidade. Eugenia e autoritarismo aparecem como solu??es que viabilizariam o t?o sonhado caminho para o progresso e para a modernidade. No entanto, sua efic?cia dependeria de uma a??o conjunta entre essas duas propostas, dados que, sozinhas, n?o seriam capazes de superar as tr?s principais causas do atraso nacional: ra?a, elites e organiza??o pol?tico-institucional.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7843 |
| Date | 28 December 2017 |
| Creators | Munareto, Geandra Denardi |
| Contributors | Abreu, Luciano Aronne de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Hist?ria, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 1740700517806534787, 500, 500, 500, 600, -6557531471218110192, -3840921936332040591, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds