<p>Abstrakt</p><p>The purpose of this study is to examine how Swedish politicians and textbooks in social science choose to describe communism, this in order to see if there is a main discourse that controls what communism is associated with. The study is structured by the following question: How does Swedish politicians and textbooks choose to describe communism, is there a main discourse that controls how language is used? The method chosen for the analysis is discourse analysis. Chain analogy is used to structure the studied texts discursive content. Four textbooks in social science are analyzed and a number of public government documents that contains discussions about communism and the agency Forum för levande historia.The analysis shows that there is a clear discourse among leading politicians that dictates that communism is to be associated with a spectrum of negative words and concepts, but when it comes to the textbooks there isn’t an equally clear discourse and the textbooks differ among themselves in general content. When both discourses are compared, the result is that the only thing the politicians and the textbooks have in common is their view that Soviet Union was a communist dictatorship.</p><p>Keywords: communism, textbooks, politicians, discourse</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:kau-5894 |
| Date | January 2010 |
| Creators | Strömberg, Gustav |
| Publisher | Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds