Thesis (M.A.)--York University, 2008. Graduate Programme in Social Anthropology. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 188-192). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:MR51541

Thesis (M.Ed.)--Regis University, Denver, Colo., 2009. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on Jul. 28, 2010). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Cleveland State University, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 45-52). Also available online (PDF file) by a subscription to the set or by purchasing the individual file.

Thesis (M.A.)--Cleveland State University, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 45-52).

Existe controvérsia na literatura sobre a possibilidade de divisão espacial da atenção visual. Alguns autores encontraram evidências de que a atenção visual voluntária se divide no espaço. No entanto, a possibilidade de divisão da atenção automática ainda não foi adequadamente investigada. O objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar a possibilidade de uma divisão da atenção visual automática no espaço. Em um primeiro e segundo experimentos testamos a possibilidade da atenção automática se dividir em um mesmo hemicampo (esquerdo ou direito). Em um terceiro e quarto experimentos investigamos a possibilidade de divisão da atenção automática entre os hemicampos visuais (esquerdo e direito). Em conjunto, os resultados deste trabalho sugerem que a atenção automática pode se dividir entre os hemicampos visuais esquerdo e direito, mas em cada um destes hemicampos forma um foco único longo e estreito. / Several studies demonstrated that voluntary visual attention can be divided. The possibility that this also occurs for automatic visual attention was investigated here. In the first and second experiments of this study the possibility of attention division in the same hemifield was examined. In the third and fouth experiments the possibility of attention division between hemifields was examined. The results suggest that automatic visual attention can not divide in the same hemifield but may divide between hemifields.

A key question in the investigation of awareness is whether it can occur without attention, or vice versa. Most evidence to date suggests that attention is necessary for awareness of visual stimuli, but that attention can sometimes be present without corresponding aware-ness. However, there has been some evidence that natural scenes in general, and in particular scenes including animals, may not require visual attention for a participant to become aware of their gist. One relatively recent paradigm for providing evidence for animal awareness without attention (Li, VanRullen, Koch, & Perona, 2002) requires participants to perform an attention demanding primary task while also determining whether a photograph displayed briefly in the periphery contains an animal as a secondary task. However, Cohen, Alvarez, and Nakayama (2011) questioned whether the primary task in these experiments used up all the available attentional capacity. Their experiments used a more demanding primary task to be sure attention really was not available for the image-recognition task, and the results indicated that attention was contributing to the animal detection task. However, in addition to changing the primary task, they displayed the stimuli for the two tasks superimposed on each other in the same area of the visual field. The experiment reported here is similar to the one by Cohen et al., but with the stimuli for the two tasks separated spatially. Animal recognition with separated stimuli was impaired by additionally performing the attention-demanding task, leaving no good evidence that it is possible to recognize natural scenes without attention, in turn removing this support for awareness without attention.

The concept of attention is complex and multifaceted and can be approached from many perspectives. One such perspective is of attention as a limited pool of resources. Kahneman’s (1973) model of limited capacity provides a basis for understanding constraints on attention, including the costs of divided attention. In the same vein as Kahneman’s model, the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL; Pichora-Fuller et al., 2016) applies the concept of limited attentional capacity to the demands of listening in a variety of contexts. The current work examines novel combinations of the methods commonly used in the field of Cognitive Hearing Science to address questions about the nature of attention allocation when listening in noise and under the constraints of divided attention. I first combined listening in noise with a secondary continuous working memory task and measured pupillary response as an index of cognitive work and listening effort. Here, I found that listening task demands affect performance on the working memory task. The shared demands of listening and working memory were not, however, evident in the pupil dilation patterns. As a result, I followed these findings by employing a different divided attention method. With the use of a temporally discrete secondary task that either closely overlapped with the listening task or did not closely overlap, I found the same carryover effects of listening demands on secondary task. Most importantly, I found that these demands interacted and were clearly present in the pupil dilation patterns, demonstrating the importance of the timing of the task demands. Together, the studies in this thesis provide evidence that these two secondary tasks access the same attentional resources as those accessed in the primary listening task and that this overlapping demand for resources can be seen in the pupillary response. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Listening to speech in a noisy environment is a cognitively difficult and effortful task. Attending to more than one task at a time is similarly demanding and effortful. These two kinds of tasks are assumed to use the same limited pool of cognitive resources that we have available to us. This thesis combines listening in noise with divided attention tasks to demonstrate this overlap in demands for cognitive resources using novel combinations of these kinds of tasks. Additionally, this thesis uses the pupillary response—a well-studied index of cognitive effort—to further examine the nature of these overlapping task demands. These studies found that the demands of these tasks do, in fact, overlap, and contribute evidence to the current literature supporting the underlying assumption that these two tasks, and the pupillary response as a measure of effort, are accessing the same pool of limited resources.

Text in Afrikaans / Hierdie studie ondersoek die moontlikheid dat aandagtekort versteuring met hiperaktiwiteit(ATHV/H) verband hou met probleme met voortgesette aandag, terwyl aandagtekort versteuring sander hiperaktiwiteit(ATHV/SO) verband hou met probleme met gefokusde aandag. Neurosielkundige toetse waarmee voortgesette- en gefokusde aandag gemeet word, word gebruik om drie groepe, naamlik ATHV/H(n=24), ATHV/SO(n=l5) en 'n kontrole groep(n=21), met mekaar te vergelyk. Resul tate dui daarop dat die groep ATHV/SO beduidend swakker presteer as die ander twee groepe op sommige van die toetse van gefokusde aandag, en ook neig om swakker te presteer op die toets van voortgesette aandag. Die groep ATHV/SO se probleme blyk gekoppel te wees aan 'n stadiger spoed van kognitiewe prosessering en 'n toestand van hipoopwekking. Die groep ATHV/H presteer nie beduidend swakker as die ander twee groepe op die toets van voortgesette aandag nie, maar presteer wel swakker as die kontrole groep op die Stroop Colour-Word Test waar inhibisie van ontoepaslike response vereis word. Die groep ATHV /H se probleme blyk verband te hou met frontale disfunksie wat manifesteer as 'n neighing tot impulsiwiteit en gebrekkige gedragsregulering. / This study examined the possibility that attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity(ADHD/H) is related to problems with sustained attention, while attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (ADHD/WO) is related to problems with focussed attention. The performance of three groups: ADHD/H (n=24), ADHD/WO(n=15) and a control group(n=21) were compared. Results indicated that the ADHD/WO group performed significantly poorer than the other two groups on some of the tests of focussed attention and also tended to perform poorer on the test assessing sustained attention. This groups' symtoms appear to be related to a slowed speed of processing and a state of hypo-arousal. The ADHD/H group did not perform poorer than the other two groups on the test assessing sustained attention. The ADHD/H groups' symptoms appear to be related to frontal dysfunction resulting in impulsivity and poor behavioural control. / Psychology / M.A. (Sielkunde)

Text in Afrikaans / Hierdie studie ondersoek die moontlikheid dat aandagtekort versteuring met hiperaktiwiteit(ATHV/H) verband hou met probleme met voortgesette aandag, terwyl aandagtekort versteuring sander hiperaktiwiteit(ATHV/SO) verband hou met probleme met gefokusde aandag. Neurosielkundige toetse waarmee voortgesette- en gefokusde aandag gemeet word, word gebruik om drie groepe, naamlik ATHV/H(n=24), ATHV/SO(n=l5) en 'n kontrole groep(n=21), met mekaar te vergelyk. Resul tate dui daarop dat die groep ATHV/SO beduidend swakker presteer as die ander twee groepe op sommige van die toetse van gefokusde aandag, en ook neig om swakker te presteer op die toets van voortgesette aandag. Die groep ATHV/SO se probleme blyk gekoppel te wees aan 'n stadiger spoed van kognitiewe prosessering en 'n toestand van hipoopwekking. Die groep ATHV/H presteer nie beduidend swakker as die ander twee groepe op die toets van voortgesette aandag nie, maar presteer wel swakker as die kontrole groep op die Stroop Colour-Word Test waar inhibisie van ontoepaslike response vereis word. Die groep ATHV /H se probleme blyk verband te hou met frontale disfunksie wat manifesteer as 'n neighing tot impulsiwiteit en gebrekkige gedragsregulering. / This study examined the possibility that attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity(ADHD/H) is related to problems with sustained attention, while attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (ADHD/WO) is related to problems with focussed attention. The performance of three groups: ADHD/H (n=24), ADHD/WO(n=15) and a control group(n=21) were compared. Results indicated that the ADHD/WO group performed significantly poorer than the other two groups on some of the tests of focussed attention and also tended to perform poorer on the test assessing sustained attention. This groups' symtoms appear to be related to a slowed speed of processing and a state of hypo-arousal. The ADHD/H group did not perform poorer than the other two groups on the test assessing sustained attention. The ADHD/H groups' symptoms appear to be related to frontal dysfunction resulting in impulsivity and poor behavioural control. / Psychology / M.A. (Sielkunde)

The purpose of this study was twofold: to determine the construct validities of comparable AD/HD instruments that were developed according to our current, DSM-IV classification system for AD/HD; and to identify potential +neurocognitive and socioemotional markers for AD/HD. The sample consisted of 145 children ages 8 to 11 years of age who were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), or Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD). Children were administered a battery of neurocognitive tests and completed a self-report measure of personality. Parents completed several, AD/HD instruments pertaining to their children. The AD/HD instruments used in this study were the Attention Deficit Disorder Evaluation Scale-Home Version (ADDES), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Test (ADHDT), and the Attention Problems and Hyperactivity scales from the BASC-Monitor (BASC-M). Of interest was how each AD/HD instrument compared to the DSM-IV, particularly in terms of the cross-consistency of AD/HD subtype classifications. The findings showed that the AD/HD instruments classified participants differently from the initial, DSM-IV entry diagnosis. Rates of agreement were better for some of the AD/HD instruments than for others yet there was little overall consistency. The neurocognitive measures used in the study were the Cognitive Assessment System-Basic Battery scales. The socioemotional measures used in the study were two parent-report scales from the BASC-M (Internalizing Problems and Adaptive Skills), and the child report scales from the BASC-Self Report of Personality. Results showed that the neurocognitive measures were relatively insensitive to AD/HD symptomatology while a nearly opposite trend was observed on the socioemotional measures. For the most part, participants classified as the ADHD-Combined Type (ADHD-CT), (regardless of which AD/HD instrument was used) had the most significant impairment in areas of social functioning and emotional symptoms across parent and self-reports.