Recent years have witnessed a growing concern for the ability of firms to effectively manage their new product innovation in the face of disruptive technological changes, increased global competition, and rising costs of research and development. These concerns notwithstanding, firms are additionally required to launch radical new products to the market, as incremental new products provide their developers with only short-term sales and profitability. In response to these challenges, firms have entered into collaborative alliances to share the risks and costs involved in the new product development (NPD) process and to enhance their product innovation performance. Turning research discoveries into marketable radical new products through collaborative alliances is even more important for relatively small firms operating in technologically intensive industries. Such firms are often underfunded and unable to undertake a full NPD cycle internally due to an inability of assembling the right mix of internal capabilities. The inevitable need to access capabilities from alliance partners may lead some small firms to form collaborative alliances under unfavourable situations, which make alliances prone to failure (70% by some estimates) to reach new product innovation goals. The substantial rate of alliance failure is embedded in a clash between the logic of radical new product innovation management (the need for flexibility between alliance partners), and recommendations for alliance management (the need to determine the responsibilities of each partner from the onset of the alliance). Despite the benefits of alliances in providing required resources, alliances can impose substantial transaction costs to focal small firms. Thus, it is crucial to investigate how firms, particularly small firms, can make a balance between the benefits and costs involved in alliances, to mitigate alliance risks and increase the probability of new product radicalness. In this thesis, I introduce a new typology and demonstrate its application to product performance. The typology categorizes alliance partnerships along two dimensions of partnership timing (the stage of the NPD process during which alliance is formed) and partnership type (the role of alliance partner during the NPD process). I use this this typology to determine the interaction effects of partnership timing and type on the probability of product innovativeness (radicalness). To this end, I rely on insights from Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) and Resource Based View of the firm (RBV) theories as well as the absorptive capacity concept to develop testable hypotheses. I use a sample of 230 drugs developed by 85 biotechnology firms in collaborative alliances with 384 alliances in 1982-2016 with universities and research institutes, other biotechnology firms, and pharmaceutical firms formed during discovery, development, and prelaunch stages of the new drug development process. I find that the probability of drug radicalness increases when alliances with universities and research institutes, as well as other biotech firms, are formed during the discovery or development stages of the new drug development. However, results indicate that partnership with pharma firms during the discovery or development stages reduces the likelihood of drug radicalness. During the prelaunch stage, except for negative relation between alliances with other biotech and drug radicalness, results failed to find a significant relationship between university as well as pharmaceutical partnership and drug radicalness. By disintegrating alliances along two dimensions of partnership type and timing, this thesis substantially increases the understanding of the benefits and costs of each partnership type and during each stage of the NPD process. This helps relatively small firms to better understand when and with whom during the process of NPD they need to initiate alliances to increase their likelihood of product radicalness. This thesis also contributes to the current theoretical insights of TCE and RBV theories by considering costs and benefits of each partnership type variant along different stages of the NPD process. Methodologically, instead of focusing on analysis using firm level outcome variables (count number of new products), this thesis turns the unit of analysis to product level (innovativeness of the product) and links each product to its designated alliance attributes (timing and type) to provide more subtle and fine-grained implications. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

With the signing of the New Partnership Agreement (Cotonou Convention) between the European Union and the African, Caribbean, and Pacific States in June 2000, the trading relationship between Senegal and the European Union (EU) has taken a new direction. Under the new agreement, Senegal must decide by 2004 if it will enter into a Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (REPA) with the EU, similar to a free trade arrangement, or move to an enhanced form of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Given the high percentage of Senegalese groundnut products that are exported to the European Union and the significance of the groundnut sector to the Senegalese economy, this study examines the economic impacts of both options on the Senegalese groundnut sector in conjunction with changes in development funding, infrastructural investments, and structural adjustment policies. Overall, the study finds that the REPA option is the more beneficial for the Senegalese groundnut sector. This result stems partially from the ability of increases in development funding to offset any adverse economic impacts caused by the REPA. Though overall more harmful than a REPA, moving to an enhanced GSP does have the benefit of increasing groundnut (in-shell and shelled) exports by a significant amount. Thus, the Senegalese government must weigh the benefit of a boost in the confectionery sector against the adverse impact on producers caused by the GSP. This study provides needed information for policy decisions by the Senegalese government, and a framework for future modeling efforts pertaining to the Senegalese groundnut sector. / Master of Science

Zugl.: Bremen, Universiẗat, Diss., 2009.

Univ., Diss.--Hamburg, 2002.

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1948 P75 / Master of Science

No description available.

There is increasing emphasis on the outcomes of research in terms of its impact on wider society. However in the social sciences the ways in which research is taken up and used, discussed, shared and applied in different policy, practice and wider settings is complex. This thesis set out to investigate the ways in which social research was used by various non-academic actors, and to explore what impact it had in order to develop methods for understanding and assessing impact. The research investigated what research impact is, how it occurs, and how it might be assessed. The research was in two phases: firstly, a case study of a research partnership between a research centre and a voluntary organisation; and, secondly, the development and seeking feedback on a framework to assess impact. The care study employed two main approaches: forward-tracking - from research to policy and/or practice - and backward tracking - from policy back to research. Both phases were conducted through a practitioner-research approach, bringing experience of working with the projects involved into the heart of the research model. The study found many ways the research from the partnership had been used in different sectors by different actors. Impacts from the research were harder to identify. In cases where there were clear impacts, the actors involved had adapted research to fit the context for research use in order to create impact. Research users continued to draw on the research for many years after publication, creating further impact as new policy or practice agendas arose. The framework used a 'pathways to impact' model to develop a theory-based approach to assessing impact and to create categories for data collection. The ways in which research might impact on policy and practice are many and cannot be easily predicted. Concepts from complexity theory, particularly a focus on relationships, an understanding of context and the concept of emergence have been useful in framing the picture of impact generated from this research. Any assessment of impact from social research needs to acknowledge that many actors are involved in the process of research being taken up and used, and impact cannot be achieved from the supply side alone. Partnership research, between an academic and voluntary sector organisation, facilitated the use and impact of the research in many ways. The thesis reconceptualises ideas about how research impacts on society, suggesting the concept of 'contribution' is more accurate and useful than attribution. It also adds to the body of empirical work on the processes of impact, and in particular of the role of research partnerships in increasing impact. It suggests that process-based approaches to assessing impact that acknowledge complexity may be fruitful in developing impact assessment methodology.

This research aims to explore and identify essential elements of community engagement in the public sector, including library services. Previous research has highlighted public libraries objectives in undertaking community engagement, in terms of tackling social exclusion, promoting democracy and contributing to social/cultural/human capital. However, it is also apparent that there is a lack of shared vision and strategy for community engagement in public libraries. Furthermore, little systematic research has examined the community engagement process in practice. Hence there is a need for a systematic, comparative and empirical investigation into essential elements of community engagement in public libraries. The study was qualitative, involving three case studies in England. Research methods employed to gather data included semi-structured interviews, direct observation and document analysis. Both the viewpoints of service providers and service users were captured. Essential elements of community engagement were initially identified in case specific contexts. The discussion of the relationships between elements then identified two key underlying variable drivers (i.e. influence of authority and willingness to learn ) that had a fundamental impact on community engagement. Influence of authority was defined as the extent that the initiative was led by the service or the community. Willingness to learn was defined as the extent that the service was willing to embrace a community-driven approach or a library-based approach for implementing community engagement. The empirical investigative results identified the essential elements of community engagement as comprising of: accountability , belonging , commitment , communication , a flexible approach , genuineness , relevance and sustainability . The significance of this research is the identification, based on empirical data, of arguably the essential elements of community engagement in the public library context. However, it is likely that these elements are key to forms of community engagement both within and outside the public sector. Recommendations are made in conclusion for the promotion of genuine community engagement, where the community-driven approach and the organic nature of the community engagement process are seen as being paramount to engagement.

published_or_final_version / abstract / Architecture / Master / Master of Science in Interdisciplinary Design and Management

This case study examined the evolution of a partnership between a middle school mathematics teacher and a university researcher around discussions on the content and teaching of mathematics. In particular, the study sought to examine the evolution of the partnership, the constraints present for the teacher and researcher, the impact of the partnership on the mathematical and pedagogical issues that arose in planning, teaching, and assessment, and the impact on the tasks that the teacher chose and implemented in the classroom. Drawing from the literature on collaborations and the emergent perspective, the evolution of the partnership occurred through three stages, determined by the content-teaching tensions. The first stage focused on the mathematics content, with the agenda being set and run by the researcher. The second stage gave rise to the content-teaching tensions as the teacher shifted the discussions from content to a focus on lesson planning and teaching. Tensions were resolved in the third stage with the teacher taking a proactive role in the discussions of lesson design and teaching. The mathematical issues in planning and teaching reflected the shift in the partnership where in the beginning the discussions focused on the mathematical content, later discussions centered on a combination of content, pedagogy, and student thinking. The assessment discussions addressed differences between the language of the curriculum and the district and state tests.The shift in the partnership can be attributed to the teacher's choice of high level mathematics tasks, the subsequent adoption of a conceptually based mathematics curriculum and the effective management of the dialectic tensions by both partners. This study illustrated that generating perturbations and effective management of dialectical tensions has the potential for a fruitful collaboration between teachers and researchers.