No description available.

<p>2021-05-31</p>

<p>2021-05-31</p>

<p>2021-06-22</p>

<p>2021-05-31</p>

No description available.

The aim of the study was to understand the Swedish Social Insurance Agency's rejection decisions for individuals with mental illness from a power perspective through a qualitative text analysis of legal documents. The study examines how the Swedish Social Insurance Agency justifies its rejection decisions for individuals who have applied for sickness benefit for mental illness and also which tools are applied in the exercise of power. Furthermore, the authors have immersed themselves in the cases of the individuals behind the figures in the statistics in relation to the managing authority. Expressions of power were found between the social insurance officer and the insured and this was evident in the study. Something among other things that the authors found in the assessments is how the Swedish Social Insurance Agency's own rules sometimes seem to create ambiguity and uncertainty.

That people in homelessness are beggars and crazy people are preconceptions inherited through generations, and to date, there is still a lot of discrimination towards people living in homelessness. The aim of the study is to investigate people working in non-profitable organisations targeting people in homelessness´s perception of people in homelessness´life situations. The study is based on a qualitative method where data was collected from six semi-structured interviews. with staff working close with people living in homelessness. The analysis of the interviews resulted in six different categories: everyday life, needs, treatment, homeless as a stigma, empowerment and social responsibility. The results show that people who live in homelessness is a heterogenous group and, therefore, have different life situations and needs. People in homelessness face difficult situations with multiple challenges everyday. In addition, the participants describe that discriminations against people living in homelessness is common, which can result in reduced self-esteem for the person living in homelessness. To solve the problem of homelessness is both the individual and the society´s responsibility but the societal responsibility to solve the problem with homelessness need to be more emphasized. / Att personer som lever i hemlöshet är tiggare och galna människor är fördomar som gått över generationer och även idag utsätts denna grupp för en hel del diskriminering. Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka vad personal på ideella organisationer som riktar sig till personer som lever i hemlöshet, har för uppfattning kring livssituationen hos personer som lever i hemlöshet. Studien utgår från en kvalitativ metod där insamlingen av data genomfördes via sex semistrukturerade intervjuer med personal som arbetade nära personer som lever i hemlöshet. Tematiseringen av resultatet utmynnade i sex kategorier: en vardag, behov, bemötande, hemlös som stigma, egenmakt och samhällets ansvar. Resultatet visar på att personer som lever i hemlöshet utgör en heterogen grupp och att deras situation och behov därför skiljer sig åt. Något som däremot framgår är att personerna befinner sig i en svår situation med dagliga utmaningar. Intervjupersonerna beskriver även att de möter hel del diskriminering mot personer som lever i hemlöshet, vilket kan resultera i ytterligare försämring av självkänslan. Vidare lyfts i studien att ansvaret för att personer ska komma ur sin hemlöshet kan förläggas hos individen och samhället, men att samhällets ansvar för att förbättra situationen för personer som lever i hemlöshet bör betonas mer.

ABSTRACT The purpose of the following qualitative study is to investigate how social workers in the social services make decisions based on the application of law from the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Social Services Act for children of school age up to 15 years, who have problems in their relationship with their guardians and who are exposed to an unsafe environment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four social workers. In the social services' child and youth investigations, the best interests of the child and the Convention on the Rights of the Child are considered in Article 12. The study wants to understand how social workers consider the best interests of the child in investigations and assessment of interventions. There are several different methods that are implemented in the social services' child and youth investigation. BBIC, Signs Of Safety and ACE. The methods are applied to help social workers to investigate those families with children where, for example, there is violence in a close relationship, neglect and where there are shortcomings in parenting. Interventions that the social worker offer are supportive interventions and intervention efforts. Important factors that can affect the assessment one of the efforts is health. Keywords: Sign of Safety, children social work, children mental illness, parental behavior affects children and parents' relationship to their children.

<p>2021-06-03</p>