• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

從司法院大法官解釋析論我國公務人員之權利救濟 / Analyzing the scheme of administrative remedy of R.O.C under the interpretation of law made by the Grand Justice of the Judicial Yuan

李武育, Lee, Wun Yuh Unknown Date (has links)
法諺云:「有權利,即有救濟」,又云:「法律賦予權利於先,並設救濟於後」。我國憲法第十六條規定,人民有請願、訴願及訴訟之權,即以根本大法揭示政府應提供人民權利保護請求權,以對抗違法或不當之侵害。有關公務人員之權利救濟,在司法院大法官解釋一八七號公布前,向來浸濡於傳統特別權力關係思潮,致被剝奪殆盡。釋字一八七號公布後,首揭公物人員退休金案件得予爭訟之先例,變更公務人員勤務關係所若生爭執不得爭訟之解釋與判例。之後,相繼公布釋字第二○一、二四三、二六六、二八○、二九八、三一二、三二三、三三八號等解釋,放寬公務人員財產權、工作權、身分權之救濟,非但彌補公務人員權利救濟之闕漏,更成為我國人員權利救濟制度之核心,由於大法官解釋突破原有藩籬,除對公務人員申訴與保障產生重大變革外,亦影響公務人員考績、懲戒、懲處等制度,且因大法官解釋文甚為簡潔抽象,若干疑義亦有待探究釐清,亦是本論文研究重點。   本文共分七章,首章緒論敘述本研究之目的,架構、方法及限制等﹔次章就公務人員權利之內涵、權利救濟之基本功能加以闡釋分析,以建立權利救濟之基本觀念﹔第三章分別介紹美、日、英三國公務人員權利救濟之主要內涵,並分析制度特點,以為我國建制參考﹔第四章從法規及實務層面介紹我國公務人員權利救濟制度之沿革﹔第五章著重於司法院相關解釋涵義之闡述與評價﹔第六章說明司法院大法官解釋之影響層面;第七章提出研究結論與建議。   本研究預期達成下列目標,1.大法官解釋涵義之闡述與評論,2.重建公務員與國家之關係,3.經由制度分析法及比較研究途徑析取先進國家權利救濟制度之精華,4.健全權利救濟體系之功能,5.為我國申訴與保障制度提出建設性意見,6.針對公務人員懲戒,考績、任用法規應予配合修正之處,研擬具體建議。
2

中央與地方府際衝突之研究 / The Research on Conflicts between Central and Local Governments

高美莉, Kao, Mei Li Unknown Date (has links)
1999年地方制度法施行以來,地方極力爭取自主權,中央與地方自治團體間衍生多次衝突,爭議之層面涵括地方財政權、立法權及人事權等地方自治核心領域。針對中央地方衝突,司法院大法官作出多號解釋,惟並未定紛止爭,突顯出建立中央地方衝突解決機制之必要性。 本論文選擇五個衝突個案,分別是財政衝突的統籌分配稅款及地方積欠健保政府補助款;立法衝突之行動電話基地台自治條例牴觸案及台北市里長延選案;人事權衝突之縣市警察局長任免案。先以府際關係理論進行鉅觀分析,分析其府際關係網絡圖,突顯其網絡利害關係人,如何進行聯合或對抗。次以賽局理分論析中央地方之賽局策略選擇過程,進而賽局及報酬模擬分析。 期望透過各類型中央地方府際衝突個案研究,提出解決下列問題。一、釐清中央地方府際衝突之影響因素?二、究竟何為中央地方權限爭議解決機制?三、台灣府際衝突之關係網絡圖像為何?四、府際衝突賽局中之博奕過程模式為何? 本研究提出四項結論。一、法律與制度變遷與府際衝突交互運作影響;二、政黨對立為府際係衝突最關鍵影響因素;三、建立多元之協調解決機制,為解決府際衝突之有效措施。四、提出全觀型府際賽局理論,以詮釋我國府際關係衝突現象。 本研究並提出五項建議,有助於未來我國府際關係正向發展,一、釐清府際衝突深層網絡關係結構,二、擴大跨域合作府際關係,三、追求中央與地方府際之最適效益,四、邁向多層次之地方治理,五、體認「地方自治為憲法制度性保障」之真諦。 / Since the Local Government Act enacted in 1999, local governments strive for local autonomy; therefore some supervisory conflicts aroused between central and local government. Those conflicts related to law autonomous enactment, finance autonomous rights and personnel rights. Despite Judicial Interpretation No.550 and 553 had review above conflicts, disputes still remained unsolved, which proclaimed the importance of constructing the reconciliatory mechanism of conflicts. This study tries to analyze five conflict cases including tax redistribution fund, premium of National Health Insurance, cellular phone base management local act, the prolonged election of Taipei li-chairman and incumbency of police bureau chief. Four conclusions are drawn as below, first, legal and system change will affect the IGR conflicts mutually. Second, parties antagonism is a crucial factor for IGR conflicts. Third, multi reconciliatory mechanism of conflicts would be efficient, a holistic game theory could interpret those conflicts. The last chapter proposes recommendations such as to clarify the IGR networks structure, broaden the cross-boundary cooperation, pursuit the optimal payoffs, work towards a multi-level governance and comprehend the core meaning of “local autonomy as a system assurance”.

Page generated in 0.013 seconds