本研究旨在探討新北市國民小學校長分布式領導與學校創新經營之關係。研究採用調查研究法，以新北市公立國民小學教師為對象，共發出638份問卷，共獲得有效問卷525份，有效問卷回收率為82.29％。正式問卷回收之後，分別以描述統計、t考驗、單因子單變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方式對回收資料進行分析。 本研究獲得以下八項結論： 一、國民小學校長分布式領導之現況表現在中上水準，且以「建構清楚的願景與目標」構面表現較突出。 二、學校組織創新之現況表現在中上水準，其中以「學習活動創新」構面表現較突出。 三、教師個人不同背景變項對校長分布式領導在「年齡」 與 「職務」方面有差異，其餘無差異。 四、教師個人不同背景變項對學校組織創新在「年齡」 與 「職務」方面有差異，其餘無差異。 五、學校環境背景變項對校長分布式領導在「學校規模」 與「學校歷史」方面均有差異。 六、學校環境變項對學校組織創新在「學校歷史」方面有差異，「學校規模」方面無差異。 七、校長分布式領導與學校組織創新之間具有顯著正相關，校長分布式領導表現愈強，學校組織創新之特性愈強。 八、校長分布式領導與學校組織創新之間具有顯著預測力。 本研究分別就實務應用及未來研究兩方面提出如下建議： 一、實務應用方面 (一) 對教育行政主管機關之建議 1.宣導分布式領導理念，辦理相關校長及行政人員研習活動，期國民小學校長落實分布式領導，以激勵學校發展。 2.鼓勵學校創新經營，辦理研習進修活動，期許教師課程教學創新，創新學生學習活動。 3.辦理行政人員研習進修活動，以期管理服務創新。 (二) 對學校校長的建議 1.善用分布式領導，鼓勵同仁發揮專長，共同承擔領導責任發展相互依存之學校領導。 2.定期調整職務，其學校同仁有機會對不同職務有所體認，並提生教師領導能力，以增進學校效能。 3.努力營造信任的學校文化，加強校內溝通，並鼓勵教師參與校務決策，並有效協調家長及社區意見，以營造信任的學校文化。 二、未來研究方面： 本研究分別就研究對象、研究變項、研究方法，對未來研究提出建議。

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市國民小學校長空間領導與學校組織創新之現況，探討不同背景變項知覺程度之差異，分析校長空間領導與學校組織創新之相關情形，探究校長空間領導對學校組織創新的預測力，並建構國民小學校長空間領導與學校組織創新的結構方程式模型。 本研究採問卷調查法，共計抽樣100所學校，發出970份問卷，回收764份問卷，獲得有效問卷619份，可用率為64%，且經由描述統計分析、因素分析、t考驗檢定、ANOVA變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析及結構方程模式分析獲得研究結果。 本研究獲致結論如下： 一、臺北市國民小學校長空間領導達高程度表現，以「融入課程教學」構面發展最佳。 二、臺北市國民小學學校組織創新達高程度表現，以「公共關係創新」構面發展最佳。 三、臺北市國民小學以學校規模49班以上、男性、在現職學校服務年資5年以下與兼任主任職務之教師知覺校長空間領導程度較高。 四、臺北市國民小學以學校規模49班以上、男性、30歲以下、在現職學校服務年資5年以下與兼任主任職務之教師知覺學校組織創新程度較高。 五、國民小學校長空間領導與學校組織創新之間存有高度正相關。 六、國民小學校長空間領導對學校組織創新具有預測力。 七、國民小學校長空間領導與學校組織創新結構方程式模型獲得支持。 最後，本研究依據研究結論提出建議，俾供國民小學校長、教育行政機關與未來研究之參考。 / This study aims to investigate the relationship between the principal’s space leadership and school organizational innovation of elementary schools in Taipei City, to explore the diversity of different background variables in the principal’s space leadership and school organizational innovation, as well as to construct the theoretical model for these two elements. The data were collected from 100 elementary schools in Taipei City, and 970 questionnaires were distributed, with 619 valid samples. The effective rate was sixty-four percent. The collected data was analyzed by the method of descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and SEM. Below are the conclusions of this study: 1.The level of the principal’s space leadership in Taipei City schools is high, and the performance in the dimension of “integrated curriculum and teaching into space” is outstanding. 2.The level of school organizational innovation in Taipei City schools is high, and the performance in the dimension of “public relations innovation” is outstanding. 3.In Taipei City, the elementary school teachers who work in the large size school having over forty-nine classes, who are male, whose years of in-service experience are under five, and who work as directors have higher perception on the principal’s space leadership. 4.In Taipei City, the elementary school teachers who work in the large size school having over forty-nine classes, who are male, who are under thirty years old, whose years of in-service experience are under five, and who work as directors have higher perception on school organizational innovation. 5.High significant positive correlation presentes between the principal’s space leadership and school organizational innovation. 6.The principal’s space leadership has a predictive effect on school organizational innovation of elementary schools. 7.The results of this research support the theoretical model constructed in this study. At last, according to the above conclusions, the study offers suggestions for elementary school principals, education administration authorities and future research.

本研究的目的瞭解國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習及學校組織創新的關係，主要包括1.瞭解當前國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習及學校組織創新的現況。2.分析不同校長背景、教師背景、學校背景下，國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習及學校組織創新的差異情形。3.探討國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習與學校組織創新之間的關係。4.檢定國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習與學校組織創新因果關係模式之適配性。 本研究係以採用文獻分析及問卷調查法為主，利用「國民小學學校狀況調查問卷」為工具，針對台灣地區國民小學教師進行調查，總計施測1375人。使用之統計方法包括描述性統計、t 檢定及單因子變異數分析、結構方程模式進行分析。 本研究的主要結果如下： 一、國小校長在轉型領導各層面，以「激勵鼓舞」最高，而「智識啟發」最低。 二、國小在學校組織學習各層面，以「科技運用」最高，而「資訊共享」最低。 三、國小在學校組織創新各層面，以「組織氣氛」最高，而「行政管理」最低。 四、不同性別、年齡之國小校長，其轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校組織 創新無差異。 五、具「研究所」以上學歷之國小校長，其轉型領導、學校組織創新較 好，學校組織學習無差異。 六、年資五年以上，未滿十五年的國小校長，其轉型領導、學校組織學習、 學校組織創新較好。 七、不同性別之國小教師，所知覺的校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校 組織創新無差異。 八、50歲以上之國小教師，所知覺校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校組 織創新較高。 九、擔任主任或組長之國小教師，所知覺校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校組織創新較高。 十、不同學歷之國小教師，所知覺的校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校 組織創新無差異。 十一、年資25年以上之國小教師，所知覺校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、 學校組織創新較高。 十二、不同歷史的國小，校長轉型領導，學校組織學習、學校組織創新無 差異。 十三、12班以下之國小，校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、學校組織創新較 高。 十四、鄉鎮地區的國小，校長轉型領導、學校組織學習高於都市地區的國 小，但學校組織創新無差異。 十六、國小校長轉型領導透過學校組織學習而影響學校組織創新。 本研究根據研究結果，提出可供教育行政機關、校長、學校做為推動國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習及學校組織創新之參考與建議。 / This study focuses on the multi- relationships among the three main factors: principals’ transformative leadership,organizational learning and organizational innovation at elementary schools. The researcher tries to explore: 1. the current situation in which the principals’ transformative leadership,organizational learning and organizational innovation in elementary schools as far. 2. different patterns of transformative leadership,organizational learning and organizational innovation which are based on different backgrounds of the principals,teachers and schools. 3. the possible co-relationship in between the above three main factors 4. the investigation of the fitness of thecase-effect relationships among the three variables this study: principals’ transformative leadership, the organizational learning and organizational innovation in elementary schools. This study is based on literature analysis and questionnaires. The “Investigative Questionaire of the General Situations of Elementary Schools” is the main tool in use. There are 1375 teachers participating and giving their response towards the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics,t-test ,ANOVA, Cluster analysis and structural formulas are the techniques applied in the estimation ,calculation and analysis. The main results of this study are as the following: 1. At each level of the principals’ transformative leadership, the highest effective is the “ encouraging motivation” where as the lowest being “intellectual inspiration”. 2. At levels of organizational learning, the pattern is” using technology” where as the most frequently appeared information is rare. 3. In all the levels of organizational innovation in elementary schools, highest score appears in “ organizational atmosphere” and lowest in “administrative management”. 4. Among the total transformational leadership, organizational learning and innovation, there’s a tendency that shows no distinctive difference caused by the factors such as gender and age of the principals. 5. Investigation on principals who have graduate school degrees indicate that there’s no significant difference related to their performance in transformational leadership, organizational learning and innovation. 6. The principals whose tenure or seniority are between 5 and 15 years perform better in transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovations in elementary schools. 7. School teachers of different genders don’t have distinctive difference of awareness on principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation. 8. Teachers who are older than fifty years old have stronger awareness on principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation in elementary schools. 9. Teachers with side jobs tend to have higher levels of awareness towards principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation at schools. 10. There’s no significant difference in their awareness as to principals’ transformational leadership, organizational learning and innovation with respect to different educational backgrounds. 11. Teachers with teaching experience of more than 25 years have higher levels of awareness towards principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation in the schools. 12. Schools’ history doesn’t play a major role in influencing the principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation at schools. 13. The schools with fewer than 12 classes seem to perform better in principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovation at schools. 14. As to principals’ transformative leadership and organizational learning, the schools which are located in countryside and towns mostly perform at a normal standard whereas in organizational innovation they do as good as those city schools. 15. The principals’ transformative leadership works through organizational learning and ultimately has great impact on schools’ organizational innovation. The results gained from this study can be the useful information for educational administrators, school principals and schools when implementing principals’ transformative leadership, organizational learning and innovations at schools.

本研究旨在探討臺北縣立國民中學組織創新與學校效能的實際現況，分析兩者之間的關係，並依據研究結果，研擬改進與建議。 本研究以問卷調查法為主，半結構式訪談為輔，受試者包括臺北縣立國民中學校長、主任、組長、副組長、導師、專任老師，共829人，其中有效樣本649人，可用率為78.3 ﹪，研究工具為『臺北縣國民中學組織創新與學校效能問卷』。本研究以SPSS for Window11.0版套裝軟體的統計分析軟體為工具，茲將研究結果分述如下： 一、臺北縣國民中學教育人員知覺組織創新與學校效能均為中上程度。 二、臺北縣不同學校規模的教育人員知覺組織創新有明顯差異，以13-24 班的教育人員知覺度最高。 三、臺北縣不同學校歷史的教育人員知覺組織創新，有明顯差異，以學校歷史 為10年以下的教育人知覺度最高。 四、臺北縣不同性別的教育人員知覺學校效能有明顯差異，男性教育人員明顯 高於女性。 五、臺北縣不同學校規模的教育人員知覺學校效能，有明顯差異，以13-24班 的教育人員知覺度最高。 六、臺北縣學校創新經營（有參加創新比賽）之教育人員知覺學校效能有明顯 差異。 七、臺北縣國民中學組織創新與學校效能有非常顯著正相關。 八、臺北縣國民中學組織創新對學校效能有極顯著的預測力。 依據上述結論，本研究針對教育行政機關、學校及未來相關研 究提出建議，做為增進國民中學組織創新與提升學校效能之參考。 關鍵詞：組織創新、學校組織創新、學校效能。 / The purposes of this research were to explore the status quo and the relationship between the school organizational innovation and school effectiveness of the junior high school in Taipei County. Some recommendations for improvement were made according to the research conclusions. This study was proceeding primary with questionnaire surveys of school organizational innovation and school effectiveness of junior high school and supplementary with semi-construction interview. 829 samples were chosen from school in Taipei County. They were principles, directors. Department deans, department assistant deans, homeroom teachers and non-homeroom teachers of junior high school. Finally 649 data were collected. The useful rate for this research is 78.3%. The data were analyzed with SPSS for Window 11.0 edition and the conclusions of this research were as follows: 1. The teachers of junior high schools in Taipei County perceived an upper level on school organizational innovation and school effectiveness. 2. There is a significant difference of the perception of junior high school teachers in Taipei County on school organizational innovation among the teachers from different school sizes, there is higher awareness among the teachers from school of 13-24 classes’ size. 3. There is a significant difference of the perception of the junior high school teachers in Taipei County on school organizational innovation among the teachers from the school with different service periods. There is higher awareness among the teachers from school with less than 10 years in service. 4. There is a significant difference of the perception of junior high school teachers in Taipei County on school effectiveness between genders, male teachers have significant higher awareness. 5. There is a significant difference of the perception of junior high school teachers in Taipei County on school effectiveness among the teachers from different school sizes, there is higher awareness among the teachers from school of 13-24 classes’ size. 6.There is significant different of the perception of junior high school teachers in Taipei County , the teachers from the schools participating the organizational innovation competitions have higher awareness on school effectiveness. 7. There were positive and strongly significant correlation between school organizational innovation and school effectiveness of the junior high school in Taipei County. 8. The school organizational innovation had predicative efficacy school effectiveness of the junior high school in Taipei County. Based on the above conclusions several recommendations were made for the authorities of concerned, junior high schools’ principals and future researchers for improvement of school organizational innovation and school effectiveness. Key words: organizational innovation, school organizational innovation, school effectiveness.

本研究旨在瞭解幼稚園教師學校組織創新氣氛知覺、知識分享行為對創新教學行為之影響以及三者之關係。首先瞭解幼稚園教師學校組織創新氣氛知覺、知識分享行為與創新教學行為之現況；其次，探討幼稚園教師學校組織創新氣氛知覺、知識分享行為與創新教學行為之相關性；最後，以多元迴歸分析幼稚園教師學校組織創新氣氛知覺與知識分享行為對創新教學行為之預測力，以及探討學校組織創新氣氛是否透過知識分享行為此中介變項影響教師創新教學行為。 本研究以台北市公私立幼稚園教師為研究對象，以「校園創新氣氛量表」，以及修改之「知識分享行為量表」與「創意教學行為量表」為研究工具，有效樣本為272份，資料回收後分別以描述性統計、皮爾森積差相關分析，以及多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料處理。本研究獲致之結論如下： 1. 學校組織創新氣氛知覺與創新教學行為達顯著正相關。 2. 知識分享行為與創新教學行為達顯著正相關。 3. 學校組織創新氣氛知覺與知識分享行為達顯著正相關。 4. 學校組織創新氣氛的「工作條件」跟「學習成長」面向可以有效預測教師的 創新教學行為。 5. 知識分享行為的「行動示範」、「知識共構」可有效預測教師創新教學行為。 6. 就學校組織創新氣氛、知識分享行為對創新教學行為的整體模式而言，學校 組織創新氣氛中的「工作條件」可透過知識分享行為中的「行動示範」與「知識共構」此兩個中介變項預測幼稚園教師的創新教學行為。 最後，研究者根據研究結論針對幼稚園組織與幼稚園教師，以及未來研究提出具體建議，以期對未來幼稚園實行創新教學及相關後續研究有所助益。 / The main purposes of this study were as following: First of all, understand the teachers’ awareness of organizational innovative climate, teachers’ knowledge sharing behavior, and innovative teaching. Second, understand the relationships among these three variables. Third, explore the predictive power of the teachers’ awareness of organizational innovative climate, teachers’ knowledge sharing behavior, and innovative teaching. This study adopts the survey method by questionnaire. This study included 272 kindergarten teachers in Taipei city, Taiwan. The applied analysis methods were Descriptive Statistics, Factor analysis, Cronbach α coefficient analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and Regression through SPSS18.0. The main findings of this study were summarized as follows: 1. It showed positive correlation between teachers’ awareness of organizational innovative climate and creative teaching. 2. The relationships between teachers’ knowledge sharing behavior, and creative teaching were positive. 3. It showed positive correlation between teachers’ awareness of organizational innovative climate and teachers’ knowledge sharing behavior. 4. Job Conditions and Professional Learning can predict teachers’ innovative teaching. 5. Action Demonstration and Knowledge Building can predict teachers’ innovative teaching. 6. It appeared that knowledge sharing plays mediating roles among organizational innovative climate and innovative teaching.