• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

我國上市櫃建設公司財務報表之可靠性研究-兼論實施IFRS後之影響 / A Study on the Reliability of Financial Statements of Listed Real Estate Companies and the Effects of Their Adopting IFRS

林志勳 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究之目的為透過我國上市櫃之建設公司之財務報表一窺我國房地產近十年之實際狀況,以及會計政策對建設公司的財務報表與營運計畫之影響。研究方法係採用Khan and Watts在2009所提出之C_Score,作為衡量財務報表可靠程度的值。本研究以2004年至2013年合計十年為研究期間,實證結果如下: 1、上市建設公司的C_Score與上櫃建設公司之C_Score為負數,代表大多數的建設公司於2004年至2011年間的財務報表似乎不具有審慎性,本研究推測,可能是自2003年SARS風暴之後,房地產市場開始歷經十年的大多頭行情,投資人對於建設公司普遍給予較高的本益比與評價,再加上建設公司每年所發放的股利穩定,使得財務報表較不審慎。而上市建設公司的C_Score大於上櫃建設公司之C_Score,顯示上市建設公司的財務報表較上櫃公司來得可靠。 2、具有集團背景之建設公司C_Score大於不具有集團背景的建設公司C_Score,表示集團背景之建設公司財務報表審慎性較高。 3、以適用ROC GAAP與適用IFRS之財務報表做比較,適用ROC GAAP之C_Score明顯小於適用IFRS的C_Score,可見採用IFRS後,負報酬率對盈餘的增額解釋能力確實顯著提高,對於主張採用IFRS將使得財務報表審慎程度降低之說法,至少在建設業中,是不成立的。
2

財務報表審慎性比較:中國大陸會計準則vs.國際財務報導準則 / The Comparison between Conservatism of Financial Statements under PRC GAAP versus IFRS

王中任 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究之目的為透過中國大陸A股、B股公司財務報表之比較,探討相對於中國大陸會計準則(PRC GAAP),國際財務報導準則(IFRS)是否更具審慎性。研究方法採Khan and Watts在2009年發展之C_Score來衡量財務報表審慎性。研究期間為2001年初至2006年底,研究標的為在上海或深圳證券交易所同時掛牌上市A、B股之公司(意即同時按PRC GAAP及IFRS編製兩套財務報表之公司)。實證結果如下: 1.A股市場之C_Score小於B股市場之C_Score,顯示相對於依照PRC GAAP編製之財務報表,依照IFRS編製之財務報表其審慎性較高。 2.無論是針對個別產業進行A股、B股之比較,或是針對A股或B股市場進行跨產業比較,均證實產業因素會對財務報表之審慎性造成影響。 3.無論是針對A股或B股市場進行事務所規模之比較,均顯示在中國大陸,四大事務所查核之財務報表,其審慎性不但不如非四大事務所,而且在A股市場甚至不具審慎性。 / Using C_Score developed by Khan Watts(2009) to test the financial statements of Chinese companies which have both the A-Share and B-Share listed on the stock exchange marke of Shanghai and Shenzhen during 2001 to 2006, this study aims to examime whether International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS) are more conservative than People’s Republic of China’s generally accepted accounting principles(PRC GAAP). The empirical results are as follows: 1.The average C_Score of A-Share companies is smaller than B-Share Companies, which means that, as compared to PRC GAAP-based financial statements, IFRS-based financial statements are more conservative. 2.Regardless of whether the comparison is between A-Share and B-Share companies in a specific industry, or between industries in a specific stock market, the results show some industry effect on the conservatism of financial statements. 3.Regardless of whether the stock is traded on the A-Share or B-Share market, the results show that in China, financial statements audited by Big 4 are not more conservative than non Big 4. In fact, for stocks traded on the A-Share stock market, financial statements audited by Big 4 are not conservative at all.

Page generated in 0.0218 seconds