121 |
試論中小學課堂教學中學生創新能力的培養余勇康 January 2004 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities / Department of Government and Public Administration
|
122 |
關於科學本質在中國初中科學教科書中選定的科學史內容中的體現的研究 / Study of nature of science represented by selected historical topics in science textbooks used in juior high schools in China李玥 January 2011 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Education
|
123 |
電腦多媒體輔助初中一年級學生學習地理之研究 / A study of the effect of CAI on learning Geogaphy for Junior One students / Ho Weng Fai. / Study of the effect of CAI on learning Geogaphy for Junior One students何永輝 January 2010 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Education
|
124 |
澳門初中生數學自我效能、數學學業成就與學業求助之相關研究 / Correlation study on Mathematics self-efficacy, Mathematics achievement, and academic help-seeking among junior high school students in Macao;"澳門初中生數學自我效能數學學業成就與學業求助之相關研究"張思君 January 2010 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Education
|
125 |
國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標建構之研究 / A Study of the Constructing the Evaluation Indicators for Quality of Educational Space in Elementary Schools吳珮青, Wu, Pei Ching Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在建構國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標。研究方法部分,先以文獻分析歸納出國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之初擬指標,再以專家問卷以及模糊德菲術問卷進行調查。模糊德菲術調查樣本為22位對國民小學的校園規劃、空間環境相當了解的校長、學者及教育行政機關主管為對象,透過三角模糊數整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選指標項目,最後以歸一化之方式求得各構面以及各項指標權重,完成國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標體系。根據研究之結果與分析,歸納主要結論如下:
一、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標,含兩層指標,第一層指標有
6項,第二層指標有35項。
二、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之第一層指標,依權重排序分別為「安全與管護」(18.41%)、「舒適與健康」(17.51%)、「特色與美感」(16.59%)、「節能與永續」(16.40%)、「充足與彈性」(16.28%)及「社交與休憩」(14.80%)。
三、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之第二層指標依權重排序,在安全與管護方面,應特別重視校舍建築耐震防災、避難空間與動線的規劃,以及校園死角的監控管護;在舒適與健康方面,應特別重視校園環境的乾淨與整潔,且教室應有良好的照度以及通風;在特色與美感方面,應特別重視教育空間應富有寓教於境的教育情境、具有美感,以及能展現學校重要精神;在節能與永續方面,應特別重視教育空間能維持生態多樣性以及節水減碳的規畫與設計;在充足與彈性方面,應特別重視特殊需求的學生使用,並有足夠的各式教學與活動及多目的使用的空間;在社交與休憩方面,應特別重視學生交流互動、師生對話,以及與社區資源共享的空間。
最後,本研究依研究結果分別就對教育主管機關、對學校及對後續研究提出建議。 / The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation indicators for quality of educational space in elementary schools. As for research methods, by means of literature review, and then 35 indicators within 6 main dimensions had been organized as a raw model of quality of educational space in elementary schools indicators based on which the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire was developed and the survey was conducted with the sample size of 22 experts. Symmetric triangular fuzzy number then was used to analyze experts’ opinion on the importance of each indicator and to help indicator selection. At last stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each dimensions and indicators; accordingly, the quality of educational space in elementary schools indicator system was constructed. The main conclusions are as follows:
1. The quality of educational space in elementary schools indicator system consists with 6 dimensions and 35 indicators in total.
2. The 6 dimensions are:safety and security(18.41%), comfort and health(17.51%), characteristics and aesthetic(16.59%), energy efficiency and sustainability(16.40%), adequate and flexible(16.28%),social and leisure(14.80%).
3. The second layer indactors for the quality of educational space in elementarty school are : in “safety and security”, should be the building seismic disaster, asylum space and the route planning, and monitoring of management and protection of the campus corner ; in the “comfort and health”, with special attention to the campus environment clean and tidy, and the classroom should have good illumination and ventilation; in the “characteristics and aesthetic” context, special attention should be full of educational space education through environmental education context, the aesthetic , as well as important to show school spirit; in “energy efficiency and sustainability”, and the particular importance of education to maintain the ecological diversity and space saving and carbon reduction planning and design; in “adequate and flexible” in regard, special attention to students with special needs, and there is enough variety of teaching and activities and multi-purpose use of space; in “social and leisure” aspects, special attention should be student interaction, teacher-student dialogue and resource sharing with the community space.
According to the conclusions, some suggestions had been proposed : 1..suggestions for education administrators,2.suggestions for schools, and 3.suggestions for further study.
|
126 |
親師生信任連結的家校生活:一所台灣另類國民小學教育實踐之個案研究 / The Home-school Life of Trustful Coupling Relationship among Parents, Teachers, and Students: a Case Study on an Alternative Elementary School in Taiwan詹家惠, Jan, Chia Hui Unknown Date (has links)
本研究採用質性研究方法,以開放系統理論為架構,從組織運作的角度來探究個案學校─種籽親子實驗國民小學之日常生活和教育實踐,從而描繪出這所另類學校的學校圖像,並分析該校穩健存續的因素。本研究之研究結果如下:
一、本研究分別以「學生學習的制度」和「學校運作的制度」來描繪種籽親子實驗國民小學之學校圖像。前者包含課程學習及生活學習的各項制度,開展出師生自由自主、和諧共融的家校生活;後者敘述親師合作辦學治校,以及攸關教師成長的各項制度,開展出親師互信互賴、共同成長的家校生活。這兩個圖像共同呈現該校特殊的「家校生活」面貌:親師生皆能自在地以其本然面貌所展現的個別性,在學校共同生活。親師生和諧共融、互信互賴的基礎正在於鼓勵個人真實呈現自我的制度與文化。「家校生活」不僅意味著親師生在學校能延續著各自在家庭裡個人化的樣貌,更顯示家庭與學校之間資源互通、成員交流,學校呈現出由一個個學生家庭及教師團成員的家庭所組成的共同體。學校生活能自然融合、連結個人生活的其他面向,個別親師生因而在學校展現出一個個自主自在的完整學習個體的面貌。
二、種籽親子實驗國民小學的內部系統特性及其外部環境關係,如下數端:
(一)結構系統呈現低度科層體制特性
(二)討論文化的底蘊是「支持個別差異的開放文化」與「有機體的合作文化」
(三)教師個人系統與家長、學生個人系統彼此協調而互有影響
(四)政治系統顯現個人範疇權力的運用與組織需求的轉化能解決衝突
(五)學校與地方教育主管機關互動良好但疏於經營與所在社區的關係
三、自我組織(self-organization)的組織本質是種籽親子實驗國民小學穩健存續的因素。以內部系統來看,該校的文化系統強韌並與個人系統協調,使其維持低度科層結構並得以化解組織衝突,內部系統顯現調和一致性。以學校組織的整體系統來看,該校是文化系統運作顯著的開放系統,文化系統具自主性的「調節回饋」本質,使學校形成「自我組織」,能因應內部系統與外部環境的擾動或壓力,得以穩健存續。
四、對於種籽親子實驗國民小學的建議:
(一)親師生合力建構「種籽學」論述,做為自我改革學校變革的系統性基礎
(二)建立師資培育模式,踐行公共化使命
五、本研究對於國民教育的啟示:
(一)朝向彈性的「自我組織」發展,學校更具創新變革能力
(二)建立有利於「自我創化教師」生成的學校環境
(三)親師生共同建構學校信念,形成「信任連結」關係為學校發展基礎
(四)以種籽親子實小的經驗看「實驗教育」的挑戰與因應
1. 「學校評鑑」方式應以協助學校發展為目的,宜更具彈性、因校制宜
2. 主管機關宜促進另類學校與一般學校深度交流或彼此成果分享
3. 種籽親子實驗國民小學的學校運作模式可為偏地小校轉型再生的參考 / This dissertation applies qualitative research method and the “open systems theory” to amplify on an alternative school picture of Seedling Experimental Elementary School, and inquiries the elements on the sustainable development of the alternative school. The results of this dissertation upon the case study on Seedling Experimental Elementary School are as follows.
1. By describing and analyzing the manners and systems of student learning and school operating, this dissertation points out that the school picture of Seedling Experimental Elementary School is home-school life of trustful coupling relationship among parents, teachers, and students.
2. The organizational characteristics of Seedling Experimental Elementary School are as below. (1) It seems as if Seedling Experimental Elementary School is a bureaucratic organization, but just at a modest rate, is not typical bureaucracy. (2) The intrinsic qualities of discussing culture are supporting individual differences and cooperation. (3) The individual systems of parents, teachers, and students are congruent. (4) Invoking individual power and transferring the need for organization can reconcile conflicts in the political system of organization. (5) Seedling Experimental Elementary School has the good relationship with the authorities, but has the aloof relationship with the local community.
3. The innate character of Seedling Experimental Elementary School is “self-organization” that can reconcile the inner systems of the school organization and embrace the challenges or stress come from outer systems. Seedling Experimental Elementary School as a self-organization can be developing steady.
4. This dissertation makes two suggestions to Seedling Experimental Elementary School. First of all, parents, teachers, and students can collectively build the “Seedling knowledge”. Secondly, Seedling Experimental Elementary School can accomplish educational mission for the public by establishing the method and program of teacher education based on “Seedling knowledge”.
5. This dissertation makes some suggestions for national education. (1) The authorities could assist schools to be “self-organization-orientated” school organizations. (2) The authorities could assist schools to cultivate teachers to be “self-creation-orientated” teachers. (3) A school principal could lead parents, teachers, and students to work up the school belief and vision, which may develop trustful coupling relationship that could be the base of school. (4) Three suggestions for experimental education: first, school evaluation for schools which are proceeding with experimental education should be flexible and expediential; secondly, the authorities can boost the communication and promote the cooperation between alternative schools and common schools; finally, the school operating model of Seedling Experimental Elementary School could be the reference and resource for the transformation of small schools in rural.
|
127 |
珠海初中生家長參與在不同父母教養方式背景下對子女學業成績之影響 / Effect of parental involvement on middle school students' academic performance in the context of various parenting styles : a case in Zhuhai白玉杰 January 2012 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Education
|
Page generated in 0.0228 seconds