本研究旨在探討桃園縣國民中學教師所期望的校長教學領導行為和所知覺到的校長教學領導實際行為，藉由文獻分析、問卷調查、半結構式訪談等方法，探討教師背景變項、學校背景變項的教師對校長教學領導行為之知覺差異情形。 調查對象以桃園縣公立之國民中學教師為母群體，抽取723位教師（包括教師兼之主任與組長）做樣本，以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為調查問卷』進行問卷調查，有效問卷隨即進行編碼、記分，然後輸入電腦建立資料檔，再以SPSS 10.0 for Windows 套裝軟体進行各項統計考驗。為彌補問卷調查之不足，抽取桃園縣具代表性的六位校長以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為訪談題目』進行訪談，經錄音、編碼、整理後進行分析。 本研究所獲得之主要結論如下： 壹、桃園縣國中教師所知覺到校長教學領導行為的理想面與實踐面有明顯差 異，理想面明顯大於實踐面 貳、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在理想面的知覺度很高，其中以營造支持環境向度居七個層面之首，而以確保課程品質為最低 參、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在實踐程度方面的知覺度屬中上程度，以營造支持環境層面居七個層面之首，而以激勵教師合作與互動最低 肆、桃園縣國民中學教師在校長教學七個層面上的知覺，不管是理想面或實踐面，皆以營造支持環境為最高，且在校長訪談中亦以營造支持環境最為校長重視，此結果充分顯示校長與教師對校長教學領導的看法相當一致 伍、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的理想面，在男女性別教師變項、年資變項、擔任職務變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項並無差異。桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的實踐面，在年資變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項皆無明顯差異 陸、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在實踐面的性別變項上的知覺顯示有差異，男性教師比女性教師認為校長更有從事教學領導行為 柒、桃園縣國民中學一般教師與兼行政教師對校長教學領導在實踐面有明顯差異，兼行政之教師比一般教師認為校長在教學領導的實踐程度上較高 捌、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在學校規模變項，不管理想面或實踐面的知覺度都以24班以下為最高 依據研究結論，本研究提出以下建議： 壹、對教育主管機關之建議 一、加強充實校長教學領導的理念 二、師資與校長培訓中加入教學領導的課程 三、適時縮小學校規模 四、校長評鑑時應重視教學領導項目 貳、對國民中學校長的建議 一、充實教學領導知能，積極扮演教學領導角色 二、建立教學領導團隊，引導教師合作與互動 三、推行教學領時應積極營造良好的學校文化 四、校長應致力於確保課程品 五、加強各領域教學研究會功能 參、對未來研究的建議 未來研究對象可進一步擴大地區範圍，研究變項應該加入教師學歷變項學區家長變項及學校效能，學生學習成就等相關變項，為了更能瞭解校長教學領導行為，未來的研究宜加入實際觀察、個案研究等方式。 / The purpose of this study was surveying the principals’ instructional leadership behaviors expected and perceived by the junior high school teachers in Taoyuan County. The study explored the differences in the sense of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers in teacher background and school background variables. The study took Taoyuan County’s public junior high school teachers as population from which 723 teachers (including teachers as part-time directors and chiefs) were randomly sampled. The effective questionnaires are then encoded, scored and stored, finally analyzed by SPSS 10.0. To supplement the questionnaire survey, the study also conducts in-depth interviews with six principals among all public junior high schools in Taoyuan County with the “the Junior High School Principal’s Instructional Leadership Behaviors” developed by the author. The conclusions and implications of the present study are summarized below: 1. Significant differences are found between what expected and what actually realized in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors. What expected are higher than what realized. 2. The teachers have a high perception on the expectation of principal’s instructional leadership. Among the seven major aspects of instructional leadership, Supportive Environment Creation ranks as top priority and Course Quality Assurance as the last. 3. The realization aspect of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers was above average. Among the seven major aspects of principals’ instructional leadership, The dimension of supportive environment creation ranked as top priority and the encouraging teachers’ cooperation and interactions as the last. 4. Among the seven instructional leadership aspects of the principal perceived by the teachers, The demension of supportive environment creation ranked as top one both in expectation and realization and this aspect is also most valued by all principals interviewed. This result demonstrates a high consistency between the principals and teachers on the view of the principal’s instructional leadership. 5. The teachers’ perception of expectation to principal’s instructional leadership in variables including teacher’s sex, service term, position, school location, school founding time shows no difference. The degree of realization of the principal’s instructional behaviors perceived by the teachers shows no significant difference in variables including service term, school location and school founding time. 6. The male teachers’ perception of realization of principal’s instructional leadership was significantly higher than female teachers’ in sex variable. 7. The average teachers perceived a high degree of realization in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors than the teachers as part-time administrators did. 8. The teachers’ perception of both expectation and realization of principal’s instructional leadership in school scale implies that the highest score of both arises in a school consisting of maximum 24 classes. And then there are some suggestions presenting by this study as follow: 1. Suggestions to the education authorities: (1) Promote and reinforce the concept of principal’s instructional leadership. (2) Enrich the teacher and principal training programs with Instructional Leadership Courses. (3) Downsize the school scale in time (4) Value the instructional leadership areas during evaluating principals. 2. Suggestions to junior high school principals: (1) Advance in instructional leadership knowledge and actively play the role in instructional leadership. (2) Form Instructional Leadership Teams to lead teachers to optimal cooperation and interactions. (3) Shape the school with excellent school culture actively while launching and implementing instructional leadership. (4) Devote to course quality assurance. (5) Enhance the research society’s functions 3. Suggestions to future researches : It is advisable to expand in regional scope in future study and to expand the study variables that include variables such as Teacher’s Diploma, School District & Parents, School Performance, Student’s Academic Achievements, etc.; further, to better understand the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors, it is advisable to use methods such as Actual Observation, Case Study, etc.

校長教學領導行為與九年一貫課程實施之研究 ─以桃園縣國民中學為例─ 摘 要 本研究目的主要在探討校長教學領導行為與九年一貫課程實施相關議題，並調查不同背景變項之教師，對校長教學領導行為與九年一貫課程實施的知覺上有何差異。 調查研究以桃園縣國民中學教師為母群體，抽取768位教師為樣本，以自編之「校長教學領導行為調查問卷」與「九年一貫課程實施調查問卷」進行問卷調查，計回收有效問卷712份。所得資料以SPSS10.0統計軟體進行統計分析，並透過描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法加以分析與解釋，所獲得的主要結論如下： 一、國民中學校長教學領導行為之現況分析 國中教師在知覺校長教學領導行為程度上，以「增進學生學習氣氛」最高，而最低的為「確保課程教學品質」。 二、不同背景變項(性別、年齡、教育背景、擔任職務、服務年資、學校規模、學校位置)之國中教師在知覺校長教學領導行為上有差異。 三、不同實施狀況學校的國中教師在知覺校長教學領導行為上無差異。 四、國民中學九年一貫課程實施之現況分析 國中教師在知覺九年一貫課程實施上，以「學校本位課程」最高，而最低的為「協同教學」。 五、不同背景變項(性別、年齡、教育背景、擔任職務、服務年資、學校規模、學校位置)之國中教師在知覺九年一貫課程實施上有差異。 六、不同實施狀況學校的國中教師在在知覺九年一貫課程實施上無差異。 七、國民中學校長教學領導行為與九年一貫課程實施上有正相關存在。 另本研究根據結果提出數點建議以供參考。 關鍵詞：校長教學領導行為、九年一貫課程實施 / A Study of Principals’ Instructional Leadership and Nine-Years Integrated Curriculum Implement － A Case Study for Junior High Schools in Taoyuan County Abstract The purpose of this research is to investigate principals’ educational leadership behavior in relation to issues regarding nine-years integrated curriculum practice and also to further investigate the perception differences for teachers with different background variables regarding principals’ educational leadership behavior on nine-years integrated curriculum practice. The investigation took Taoyuan County junior high school teachers as population and selected 768 teachers as samples and through self-made “Principals’ instructional leadership questionnaire” and “Nine-years integrated curriculum practice questionnaire” to do research. 712 valid questionnaires were analyzed and explained via descriptive analyses, T-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression statistic methods by conducting SPSS10.0 statistic software. The study results are as follows: 1.Teachers in junior high schools perceived that principals’ educational leadership behavior was best at enhancing a student-learning atmosphere and was worst at ensuring the quality of teaching courses. 2.Based on different teachers’ background variables (gender, age, educational background, appointed position, number of years of service, school scale and school location), there were differences in teachers’ perception to principals’ educational leadership behavior. 3.There was no discrepancy between different practical circumstances to the middle school teachers’ perceptions of principals' instructional leadership. 4.The middle school teachers have high perception of nine-years integrated curriculum practice on “School-based curriculum” and have low perception on “collaborative teaching”. 5.Based on different teachers’ backgrounds (gender, age, educational background, appointed position, number of years of service, school scale and school location), junior high school teachers perceived that there were differences in the nine-year consistent course implementation. 6.There were no differences in junior high school teachers’ perception on nine-years integrated curriculum practice in schools with different implementation conditions. 7.There was a positive correlation between junior high school principals’ educational leadership behavior and nine-years integrated curriculum practice. In addition, this research proposed several recommendations based on our results for reference. Keywords：principals’ educational leadership behavior, nine-years integrated curriculum practice.

本研究藉由文獻分析、問卷調查、訪問調查等方法探討「校長教學領導」、「學校教學氣氛」、「教師教學效能」三個變項間之關係。根據672位國中教師之量表調查與6位國中校長訪談的結果，獲得之主要結論如次： 壹、 校長教學領導方面 一、由國中教師的知覺中，發現教學領導工作尚未得到校長們特別的重視與強調；校長表現最好的教學領導向度是：「發展支持環境」，表現最差的是向度是「視導評鑑教學」。 二、地區、學校規模、校長之性別、年資與年齡對校長教學領導均有顯著的影響。 三、國中校長對「校長教學領導」之理解與認知仍然不足，多侷限在傳統狹義「教學視導」的層面。 四、國中校長認為教學領導理念應該受到重視與推展，但在實際運作時，校長們仍以扮演學校行政管理角色為主。 五、教學領導表現較佳與表現較弱之校長，所滿意於教學領導的向度並不相同，二者有不同的領導重心與作風。 六、校長推動教學領導面臨有觀念突破的困難、教師認同的困難、校長專業知能不足、校長的時間與精力不足、未列入校長考評與獎勵的重點、以及不易見其成效之困難。 貳、學校教學氣氛方面 一、國中教學氣氛是積極且正向的。國中教師在「教學投入」向度上的知覺最佳，在「團體凝聚」向度上的知覺最差。 二、地區與學校規模對學校教學氣氛無顯著影響，教師之性別、年資、年齡與職務對學校教學氣氛則有顯著的影響。 參、教師教學效能方面 一、國中教師教學效能良好。國中教師自評在「良好學習氣氛」向度上效能最佳，在「教學計畫準備」向度上效能最差。 二、學校規模、教師之年資、年齡與職務對教師教學效能有顯著影響；地區與教師性別對教師教學效能無顯著的影響。 肆、校長教學領導、學校教學氣氛、教師教學效能三變項之關係方面 一、本研究「校長教學領導」、「學校教學氣氛」與「教師教學效能」互動模式適配度佳。 二、「校長教學領導」愈強，「學校教學氣氛」愈佳。 三、「學校教學氣氛」愈佳，「教師教學效能」愈高。 四、「校長教學領導」與「教師教學效能」成負面關係；「校長教學領導」需透過良好的「學校教學氣氛」，方能提昇「教師教學效能」。 五、校長認為教學領導對教師教學效能之提昇有正面之意義，但下列不利的因素，會影響到推動的成效：教師抗拒校長教學領導的心理、校長與教師間未能相互尊重與溝通、不利的學校環境因素、教師個人專業知能的欠缺或偏頗的人格特質。 根據上述結論，本研究並針對教育行政機關、學校校長、教師及未來之研究提出建議。 / This study is based on the analyses of literature review, questionnaires and indepth interviews to discuss the relationship on three variables-- junior high school principals' instructional leadership, school instructional climate and teachers' teaching effectiveness. According to the results of 672 junior high school teachers' investigation and 6 junior high school principals interviews, the major findings were as followed: A. In the respect of principal instructional leadership a. From junior high school teachers' perception, principals do not, in particular, emphasize and pay attention to principals' instructional leadership. For principals, the best dimension is to "develop a supporting environment" and the worst is in "supervising and evaluation teaching". b. Area, school size, principals' sex, years of service, age have significant influences on principals' instructional leadership. c. For junior high school principals, their understanding and recognition to the term, "principal instructional leadership", are still insufficient. Mostly they are limited in traditional narrow stage for "supervision teaching". d. Junior high school principals think that instructional leadership should be focused on and developed. However, while working on the idea, they still play the major role of a manager in school administration. e. The satisfactory dimension of principal whose instructional leadership is better is different from that whose instructional leadership is worse. These two kinds have different focal points and manners on leadership. B. In the respect of school instructional climate a. Junior high school instructional climate is positive and correct. For junior high school teachers, the best dimension is "teaching involvement",and the worst is "coherence". b. Area and school size have no any significant influences to school instructional climate. Teachers' sex, years of service, age and post do have significant influences to school instructional climate. C. In the respect of teachers' teaching effectiveness a. Junior high school teachers' teaching effectiveness is good. In their self-evaluation, junior high school teachers have the best performance on the dimension of "good instructional climate", but have the worst performance on the dimension of "teaching plan preparation". b. School size, teachers' years of service, age and post have significant influences on teachers' teaching effectiveness while area and teachers' sex do not have any significant influences on teachers' teaching effectiveness. D. In the respect of relationship on three variables--principal instructional leadership,school instructional climate and teachers' teaching effectiveness a. In this study, Lisrel model of principal instructional leadership, school instructional climate and teachers' teaching effectiveness has good model fit. b. The stronger the principal instructional leadership is, the better the school instructional climate is. c. The better the school instructional climate is, the higher the teachers' teaching effectiveness is. d. The relationship between "principal instructional leadership" and " teachers' teaching effectiveness" is negative. Only by way of a good "school instructional climate" does "principal instructional leadership" promote " teachers' teaching effectiveness". e. Principals think that instructional leadership has positive meaning to promote teachers' teaching effectiveness. However, the following unfavorable factors will influence the efficiency of realization. They are the attitude of teachers' resistance on principals' instructional leadership, the ill relationship which the principal and teachers can not respect to one another and communicate well with one another, unfavorable factors on the environment of school and the lack of teachers' professional teaching or deviated . According to the conclusion mentioned above, this study gives suggestions to educational administration units, school principals, teachers and studies in the future.

近年來國內對學前教育研究之焦點漸跳脫課程與教學、教師與幼兒等範疇，而對學前教育組織(幼稚園、托兒所)或組織領導者(園所長)的關切亦日趨重視，亦顯現園所長對幼兒園教學品質的關係。本研究旨在探討台灣幼托園所長教學領導知覺及其相關因素。本研究採問卷調查法進行資料蒐集，問卷調查對象以台灣北、中、南、東四區共計7539公私立園所之園所長與教師為母群體，採分層隨機抽樣方式進行，對園所長與教師分別發出754份問卷，園所長部份回收400份(回收率53.05%)，教師部份回收395份(回收率52.38%)。研究工具乃依據De Bevois(1984)、Murphy(1990)、李安明(2001)、及McEwan(2003)之理論與架構為基礎，經專家審題及預試結果，修正發展成適於國內幼教領域使用之「幼托園所長教學領導問卷」。問卷回收後以SPSS 12.01套裝軟體進行資料分析。資料分析方法主要採敘述統計、信度分析、因素分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及薛費多重比較法，作為資料處理方法。本研究之主要發現如下： 一、 幼托園所長教學領導內涵包括五層面，包括：形成與傳遞園所教學目標、確保課程與教學品質、營造良好學習氣氛與工作環境、促進教師專業成長以及賦權教師。 二、 幼托園所長與教師對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度皆非常高，且無差異。 三、 在幼托園所長部份，不同「年齡」、「服務年資」、「園所地區」、「園所性質」、「園所規模」者對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度有所差異。 四、 在幼托園所教師部份，不同「園所性質」、「園所規模」之幼托園教師對「幼托園所長教學領導」知覺程度有所差異。 最後依據本研究結果分析與結論，對於幼托園所長、幼教行政機關與規劃園所長研習單位以及後續研究者提出具體建議以茲參考。 / Recently, the research focus of early childhood education has gradually put more emphasis on preschool directors in Taiwan. Much research has shown that preschool directors play a key role in preschool quality, and that their leadership also has an impact on preschools. Some scholars had emphasized that preschool directors’ leadership consist of two parts: administration leadership and instructional leadership. Somehow, there was gradually more research on administration leadership, but still very few on preschool directors’ instructional leadership. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to understand the awareness of preschool directors’ instructional leadership between preschool directors themselves and preschool teachers in Taiwan. In addition, the study was also done to identify the background factors that would influence directors’ and teachers’ awareness of directors’ instructional leadership. This study was executed using a questionnaire survey. A sample population of 754 public and private preschool directors, along with 754 teachers, participated using the survey tool, Preschool Directors’ Instructional Leadership Questionnaire, which was developed by researcher according to literature review. 400 questionnaires (effective return rate is 53.05%) were returned by directors, and 395 (effective return rate is 52.38%) by teachers. This study reports four major findings: (1) Preschool directors’ instructional leadership includes 5 dimensions:(a)To frame and communicate the school’s instructional goals; (b)To ensure learning and teaching quality; (c) To build a positive learning and working climate; (d) To promote teachers’ professional growth; (e) To delegate authority to teachers. (2) Both preschool directors and teachers had very high-degree awareness of directors’ instructional leadership. And there was no difference between the directors’ and teachers’ awareness. (3) Different age, working experience, school area, school type, and school scale have influenced preschool directors’ awareness of their instructional leadership. (4) Different school type and scale have influenced preschool teachers’ awareness of directors’ instructional leadership. Keywords: awareness of instructional leadership, preschool directors、preschool teachers、kindergarten and preschool

本研究主要目的在探討公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能之關係和影響情形及不同背景變項之校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能的差異性分析，進而建構及驗證其互動模式，並提出研究結論與建議。 本研究採訪談及問卷調查二種方法，針對校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能等三個變項進行探究。本研究首先由文獻探討分析中，建立研究架構及理論基礎，在問卷調查方面，則先以177位公立高中教師為預試樣本，將取得的樣本資料進行信度與因素分析，以發展為正式問卷。正式問卷施測後，以回收有效樣本832位公立高中教師之問卷為研究資料，分別以描述性統計、t考驗、變異性分析、相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析及線性結構方程模式等統計方法，進行資料分析。在訪談方面，根據本研究意旨與目的研擬訪談大綱，訪談13位現職公立高中校長，藉以瞭解校長與教師間對「校長教學領導」知覺的差異性及其原因。 本研究之主要研究結果如下： 一、現行公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能之整體表現 良好。 二、不同背景變項之高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能有顯著差異。 三、不同程度之校長教學領導對教師組織承諾的影響有顯著差異。 四、不同程度之校長教學領導對教師教學效能的影響有顯著差異。 五、不同程度之教師組織承諾對教師教學效能的影響有顯著差異。 六、校長教學領導與教師組織承諾呈顯著高度正相關。 七、校長教學領導與教師教學效能呈顯著中度正相關。 八、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能呈顯著中度正相關。 九、校長教學領導與教師組織承諾能有效解釋教師教學效能。 十、校長教學領導會影響教師教學效能；校長教學領導應特別重視提升教師專業。 根據以上研究結果，本研究提出以下建議： 一、對教育行政主管機關之建議 （一）培養校長教學領導專業知能 （二）建立教師專業成長機制與評鑑辦法 （三）強化校長教學領導共識 二、對公立高中校長之建議 （一）積極扮演教學領導者的角色 （二）培養良好的溝通能力 （三）重視教師努力意願、提升教師組織承諾知覺 三、對公立高中教師之建議 （一）建立教師專業知能、協商制定教師評鑑 （二）協助校長教學領導、提升教師教學效能 四、對未來研究之建議 （一）研究對象方面：擴大研究對象範圍，多元觀點研究分析。 （二）研究方法方面：多方整合專家意見，實地觀察受訪學校。 （三）研究內容方面：探討其他研究變項，建構新的架構模式。 （四）研究工具方面：發展其他研究量表，適用不同類型學校。 關鍵詞：教學領導、組織承諾、教學效能 / The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship among principals’ instructional leadership, teachers’ organization and teaching effectiveness in public senior high schools and the different effects from the different background factors. An interactive model was constructed and confirmed, and some research conclusions and suggestions were offered. This study adopted two research methods : visiting survey and questionnaire survey, aiming the relations among principals’ instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. First, the research frame and theory were established based on the literature analysis. As for the questionnaire survey, 177 senior high school teachers in public schools were chosen as pre-test samples on which the reliability and validity analysis were based and the formal questionnaires were developed. The 832 public senior high teachers’ questionnaires were used as research data and some statistical techniques such as t-test, ANOVA, correlation analysis, multiple stepwise regression analysis, and SEM were employed. As for the visiting survey, 13 public senior high school principals were interviewed to understand the differences between the principals and teachers about the awareness of “principals’ instructional leadership”. The major findings from this study are as follows: 1.The overall performances of principals’ instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness are good. 2.The effects of different background variables on principals’ instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness are statistically significant. 3.The effects of principals’ instructional leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment are significantly different. 4.The effects of principals’ instructional leadership on teachers’ teaching effectiveness are significantly different. 5.The effects of teachers’ organizational commitment on teachers’ teaching are significantly different. 6.The principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ organization are high positive correlation. 7.The principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ teaching effectiveness are medium positive correlation. 8.Teachers’ organizational commitment and teachers’ teaching effectiveness are medium positive correlation. 9.Principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment can explain effectively teachers’ teaching effectiveness. 10.Principals’ instructional leadership has effects on teachers’ teaching effectiveness; principals’ instructional leadership should put more emphasis on the teachers’ profession The suggestions made by this study are as follows: A.The suggestions to the educational administrative institutes: 1.Develop principals’ professional knowledge. 2.Establish mechanism for teachers’ professional development and assessment. 3.Strengthen the commitment of principals’ instructional leadership. B.The suggestions to the public senior school principals: 1.Play a more active role as instructional leaders. 2.Develop sound communication skills. 3.Value teachers’ devotion to teaching and raise the awareness of teachers’ organizational commitment. C.The suggestions to public senior high school teachers: 1.Develop teachers’ professional knowledge and establish teachers’ evaluation. 2.Help principals’ instructional leadership, and promote teachers’ teaching effectiveness. D.The suggestions to the research in the future: 1.The research subjects: expand the research subjects, analysis based on multiple points of view. 2.The research methods: Integrate experts’ suggestions and visit the interviewed schools. 3.The research contents: Explore other variables, and establish new research frames. 4.The research tools: Develop other research measurement and apply to different types of schools. keywords： Instructional Leadership ； Organization commitment Teaching Effectiveness

本研究旨在瞭解桃園市國民中學校長教學領導與教師學術樂觀之現況，分析在個人背景變項、學校環境變項下之教師知覺校長教學領導與教師學術樂觀之差異情形，探討校長教學領導與教師學術樂觀的關聯性及彼此間的預測力。 本研究採用問卷調查法，以桃園市29所公立國民中學之主任、組長、導師及專任教師為研究對象。共寄發問卷581份，回收562份，有效問卷512份。調查結果以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關及逐步多元迴歸等統計分法，進行資料分析與討論。經結果分析得到以下結論: 一、 桃園市國民中學教師知覺校長教學領導與教師學術樂觀為中高程度。 二、 個人背景變項中，男性教師在校長教學領導的知覺程度高於女性教師。 三、 學校環境變項中，職務性質及學校規模在知覺校長教學領導及教師學術樂 觀有顯著差異。 四、 兼任行政職務之教師在校長教學領導、教師學術樂觀的知覺程度皆高於其 他教師。 五、 學校規模在「24班（含）以下」之教師，在知覺校長教學領導及教師學術 樂觀上，皆高於「49班（含）以上」之教師。 六、 國民中學校長教學領導與教師學術樂觀有顯著正相關。 七、 校長教學領導之「完善學習環境」與「凝聚教學目標」對教師學術樂觀有 較高之預測力。 依據上述研究結論，提出相關建議，以做為教育行政機關、國民中學行政機 關及後續研究者之參考。 / This study aims at exploring the correlation and prediction level of principal’s instructional leadership and teachers’ academic optimism, in terms of different variables such as teacher’s personal background and school environment. To assess the relevance, I surveyed full-time teachers, part-time teachers, section directors and school deans in 29 public and private junior high schools in Taoyuan. Of all the 581 questionnaires applied, 512 are valid. These questionnaires are analyzed and presented by using descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple stepwise regression. The results of this survey are listed as follows: 1. The relevance between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ academic optimism is high-intermediate. 2. In the personal background variables, male teachers are more perceptive to principals’ instructional leadership than female teachers. 3. In school environment variables, the perception of principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ academic optimism vary significantly, in terms of educational positions and the size of school. 4. Teachers in administrative positions have a better perception of principal’s instructional leadership and academic optimism. 5. Teachers in a small-sized school (equal to or less than 24 classes) are more perceptive to principals’ instructional leadership and have more academic optimism than those in a larger-sized school (equal to or more than 49 classes.) 6. There is a positive correlation between junior high school principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. 7. Two factors in principal’s instructional leadership—a positive study environment and cohesive teaching objectives—are the two best predictors of teachers’ academic optimism. Relevant suggestions are provided based on the study, and serve as references for educational administrations, junior high school administrators and subsequent research.

本研究旨在探討幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能之關係。首先瞭解幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能之內涵及現況；其次分析不同背景變項在幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能之差異情形；接著探討幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能之相關，以及瞭解幼托園所主管教學領導行為對教師教學效能各層面之預測力。 本研究方法除了以文獻探討，分析教學領導行為與教師教學效能之理論與相關研究外，並兼採問卷調查法及訪談調查法。問卷調查之對象以基隆市、臺中縣、臺中市、彰化縣、南投縣，已立案之公、私立幼稚園及托兒所教師為母群體，採兩階段抽樣法進行取樣，共發出720份問卷，總計回收有效問卷493份（有效回收率68.47%）。使用之研究工具為自編之「幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能關係調查問卷」，問卷回收後，採描述性統計、信度分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、典型相關、逐步多元迴歸及薛費法多重比較，進行資料分析。在訪談調查部分，乃針對十位幼托園所主管及教師，進行電話訪談。本研究所獲致之主要結論如下： 壹、幼托園所主管教學領導行為方面 一、幼托園所主管教學領導行為表現積極，其中以「發展支持的工作環境」表現最好。 二、「園所主管年資」在幼托園所主管教學領導行為達顯著影響；而「園所所處地區」、「園所性質」、「園所規模」及「園所主管最高學歷」在幼托園所主管教學領導行為未達顯著影響。 貳、教師教學效能方面 一、幼托園所教師教學效能表現良好，其中以「教學互動」表現最好。 二、「園所性質」、「園所主管年資」、「教師年齡」、「教師任教年資」及「兼任行政職務」在幼托園所教師教學效能達顯著影響；而「園所所處地區」、「園所規模」、「園所主管最高學歷」及「教師最高學歷」在幼托園所教師教學效能未達顯著影響。 參、幼托園所主管教學領導行為與教師教學效能兩者之關係方面 一、「幼托園所主管教學領導行為」與「教師教學效能」呈現正相關。 二、「幼托園所主管教學領導行為」對「教師教學效能」具有預測力。 最後研究者根據研究結果，分別對幼兒教育行政機關、幼托園所主管培育機構、幼教師資培育機構、幼托園所主管、幼托園所教師以及後續相關研究提出相關建議，以期對未來幼教的發展有所助益。 / The main purpose of this study was to: (1) Investigate current situation of directors’ instructional leadership behaviors and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. (2) Explore the different influence effect of different variables on these two areas. (3) Analyze the relationships between directors’ instructional leadership behaviors and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. (4) Explore the predictive power of directors’ instructional leadership behaviors on the part of teachers’ teaching effectiveness. To accomplish these purposes, literature review was adopted in addition to questionnaire and interview (telephone survey). In questionnaire aspect, the teacher subjects were included public and private kindergartens and nursery schools in Taiwan, specifically Keelung City, Taichung County, Taichung City, Changhua County, Nantou County by means of stratified two-stage simple sampling. “The Kindergarten and Nursery Directors’ Instructional Leadership Behavior and Teachers’ Teaching Effectiveness Questionnaire” was designed to collect the data. 720 questionnaires were delivered, and 493 were retrieved with an effective return rate of 68.47%. The questionnaire data analysis included description statistics, reliability analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson-moment correlation analysis, canonical correlation, multiple stepwise regression analysis, and Scheffé’s posteriori comparison through the use of SPSS 10.07 for Windows. Ten directors and teachers from the sample of questionnaire interviews were selected for the telephone interviews. The major results were summarized as follows: A. In the aspect of director’s instruction leadership: a. Instruction leadership behavior of director is above average. For directors, the best dimension is to “develop a supporting environment”. b. Directors’ service years have a significant effect on director’s instruction leadership. Kindergarten location, kindergarten category of public or private, school size, and highest educational degree of the director do not have a significant effect on director’s instruction leadership. B. In the aspect of teachers’ teaching effectiveness: a. Teachers’ teaching effectiveness is above average. For teacher, the best dimension is to “instructional interaction”. b. Kindergarten category of public or private, directors’ years of service, teachers’ age, teachers’ years of service, part-time administrative position have significant influences on teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Kindergarten location, school size, highest educational degree of the director and highest educational degree of the teacher do not have significant effect on teachers’ teaching effectiveness. C. In the aspect of relationships between directors’ instructional leadership behaviors and teachers’ teaching effectiveness: a. There was a positive correlation between directors’ instruction leadership and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. b. Directors’ instruction leadership was predictive of teachers’ teaching effectiveness. In the last part, based on the findings, the researcher proposes some suggestions for the education authorities, the director training institutions, the teacher training institutions, the preschool directors and teachers, and the future researchers, hoping to benefit the development of preschool education in the future.

本研究旨在探討國民中學校長教學領導、教師領導與家庭教養文化對學生表現之影響。首先，要了解國民中學校長教學領導與教師領導之現況；其次，探討不同家庭背景學生對家庭教養文化知覺的差異情形；再者，分析校長教學領導、教師領導、家庭教養文化與學生學業成就之間的相關情形；最後，利用結構方程式以校長教學領導與家庭教養文化為外衍變項；學校文化、學生參與和認同與學生學業成就為內衍變項，探討各變項之間的直間接效果，並找出對學生表現預測力最強的因素。 本研究以九十五學年度台南市立國民中學之教師與學生為研究對象，並以研究者譯自國外重要問卷編制而成之「學校情形與領導調查問卷」和「學生參與和家庭環境調查問卷」為研究工具，有效樣本為858份，包括教師236位與學生622位。根據受試者之填答結果再分別以平均數、標準差、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關以及結構方程模式（SEM）等統計方法，進行資料處理分析。 本研究獲致之結論如下： 一、 國民中學教師對校長教學領導之知覺為中度表現。 二、 國民中學教師對教師領導之知覺為中度表現。 三、 不同家庭背景之國民中學學生對於家庭教養文化的知覺有顯著差異。 四、 國中校長教學領導與學生學業成就有正相關。 五、 國中教師領導與學生學業成就有正相關。 六、 家庭教養文化與學生學業成就有正相關。 七、 本研究所假設的結構模型在LISREL整體適配度考驗下，為一可接受模型，並可顯示出各變項之間的直間接效果。尤其，家庭教養文化對於學生表現有高度的預測力；而校長教學領導與教師領導必須透過學校文化才能對學生表現造成顯著影響。 最後，根據研究結果提出具體建議，以作為教育行政主管機關、國民中學校長、教師、家長以及未來相關研究之參考。 / The Study of the Effects of Junior High School Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Leadership, and Family Educational Culture on Student Performances The goal of the study is to explore the relationship among junior high school principal instructional leadership, teacher leadership, family educational culture and student performances. First of all, to understand the common situation of principal instructional leadership and teacher leadership in Tainan municipal junior high school. And then, to explore the differences between students’ perceptions toward family educational cultures and students’ family backgrounds, including brother and sisters’ number in family, family organization type, parents’ education degree, and parents’ occupation. Next, to analyze the correlation between principal instructional leadership ＆student achievement, teacher leadership＆student achievement, and family educational culture＆student achievement. Finally, to use the Structural equation modeling to exam the feasibility of the hypothetical model, and through the path analysis to find out the direct and indirect effects between each variable. There were 858 valid cases, including 236 teachers and 622 students. The returned data were analyzed by statistical methods such as “ Mean”, “Standard Deviation”, “One-Way ANOVA”, “Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation”, and“ Structural Equation Modeling”. The major results were summarized as follows: 1. The entire performance of principal instructional leadership in Tainan municipal junior high school is at middle degree. 2. The entire performance of teacher leadership in Tainan municipal junior high school is at middle degree, too. 3. There are obvious differences between students’ perceptions toward family educational cultures and students’ family backgrounds. 4. There is a positive correlation between principal instructional leadership and student achievement. 5. There is a positive correlation between teacher leadership and student achievement. 6. There is a positive correlation between family educational culture and student achievement. 7. Through the LISREL test, improving the hypothetical model in our research could be acceptable, and it could show the direct and indirect effects between variables. We also find out that family educational culture is the most powerful predicator to student performances in the study. At last, to bring up some concrete suggestions according to the study outcomes as references for governmental institution for education, junior high school principals, junior high school teachers and parents, and correlated study in the future.

本研究係以文獻分析、問卷調查之研究方法，以SAS統計軟體進行統計分析，以探討「校長教學領導」、「教師工作承諾」、「學校教育成效」三變項之間的關係。根據530位國中教師問卷量表的調查結果，所獲得的主要結論如下： 壹、學校教育現況的整體表現有所進步 貳、教師的教育背景提昇有必要大力推動 參、女校長所領導的學校，其學校教育成效較佳 肆、在教師人口變項方面的差異情形： （一）不同性別教師的工作承諾沒有顯著差異。 （二）在教師的年齡方面，51歲以上的教師其教師工作承諾的程度最高；30歲以下的教師其教師工作承諾的程度最低。 （三）在教師年資方面，年資最深（26年以上）的教師其教師工作承諾的程度最高。 （四）兼任行政工作的教師對校長教學領導的評價最高；對學校的組織承諾程度也最高 伍、在不同學校規模方面的差異情形： （一）大、中、小型學校的校長教學領導沒有顯著差異。 （二）中、大型學校的教師工作承諾較高。 （三）小型學校在降低學生輟學率、減少學生犯過率及學校教育成效總體表現的結果顯著的優於大型學校。 （四）中型學校在提昇升學率方面的表現顯著的優於大型或小型的學校。 陸、不同區域國民中學的校長教學領導、教師工作承諾及學校教育成效沒有顯著差異。 染、校長教學領導、教師的工作承諾與學校教育成效的關係 （一）校長的教學領導越佳，教師的工作承諾越高。 （二）校長的教學領導越佳，學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率越低；但是學生的學習進步率、畢業升學率越高，且學校教育成效的總體表現也越佳。 （三）教師對學校組織的承諾越高，則學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率越低；學習進步率、畢業升學率越高，且學校教育成效的總體表現也越佳。 （四）教師對學生教育承諾的高低對學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率沒有顯著影響；但是教師對學生的教育承諾越高對學生的學習進步率、畢業升學率、及學校教育成效的總體表現有越正向的影響。 （五）對學校組織承諾與對學生教育承諾都高的教師，學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率也低；但是學生的學習進步率、畢業升學率則高，且學校教育成效的總體表現也越佳。 （六）校長教學領導越佳且教師工作承諾越高的學校，其學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率也越低；但是學生的學習進步率、畢業升學率則越高，且學校教育成效的總體表現也越棒；反之亦然。 （七）對於學校教育成效中學生的在校輟學率、行為犯過率、學習進步率、畢業升學率，及學校教育成效總體表現的影響，以校長的教學領導最為重要、次為教師對學校的組織承諾、在其次為教師對學生的教育承諾。 根據上述主要結論，本研究所提出的建議如下： 壹、大力推動教師在職進修碩士班或是四十學分班 貳、鼓勵女性教師從事學校行政工作 參、規劃合宜的教育措施以使不同年齡教師能發揮所長，樂在工作 肆、建立專任教師兼任行政工作的輪調制度 伍、學校規模應朝班級數在31∼60班之間的中型學校調整 陸、加強校長教學領導行為及增強教師工作承諾知覺以促進學校教育成效的優良表現 柒、後續的研究可進一步探討「教師對學生的教育承諾」的影響因素，以及用於衡鑑「學校教育成效」的其他重要因子。