自民國85年開始試辦綜合高中，至今已有5年的歷史，本研究藉由「台閩地區高級中等學校概況統計」以及教育部技職司所進行第一屆18所綜合高中評鑑資料，分析綜合高中在我國辦理的概況，進以檢測與綜合高中理念之差距。再以辦學績效為效標，探求何種學校型態最適合轉型為綜合高中，以提供主管行政機關在政策執行過程之參考。 本研究藉由單因子、雙因子變異數分析以了解目前綜合高中辦理概況；採群集分析以分辦各校辦學績效（包括：升學率、就業率、每生平均考取證照數）之差異；經迴歸分析了解導致綜合高中辦學績效良好之原因。 研究結果顯示，18所辦理綜合高中的學校中10所學校提早在高一先行分化學術或職業學程，有違延緩分化的理念。在18所學校中以巿區均設職業及普通類科的公立學校辦學績效較佳。分析有利綜合高中辦學績效的原因包括：(1)學生參加校內競賽愈多或生師比愈高（指大班級）則升學率愈高（可能因為巿區學校多有較高的生師比），而學生加註主修職業學程愈高則升學率愈低；(2)擁有第二專長的教師比率愈高或學生加註主修職業學程愈高則就業率愈高；(3)學生參加校內競賽次數愈多、網路查詢電腦數愈多、教師著作比率愈高則學生考取證照愈高，但是平均每生補助款愈高，學生考取證照比率卻愈低，值得政府注意。因此，建議教育主管機關，不應多以獎勵補助的方式來協助現有高中職轉型，更應嚴格限制受補助學校的資格要求，以避免申辦學校僅為補助而非為實現綜合高中之理念。 / Comprehensive high school(CHS) has been formally established in Taiwan since 1996. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the profile of CHS in Taiwan and examine the disparity between the practical and ideal models based on High Schools Statistic Compilation in Taiwan Area」 and the evaluation reports of the 18 CHSs gathered by the Ministry of Education. Moreover, taking the school achievements as criteria, this research suggests which format of high school is more suitable to be transformed to CHS. Thus the result could be the reference to our Ministry of Education during the executive process. This research uses one-way and two-way ANOVA to interpret the CHS general situations and Cluster Analysis to determine the achievement levels of 18 CHSs including the proportion of students entering school in higher level, employment rate, and the average rate of getting technical certificate per student. Also, the Regression Analysis is utilized to analyze the characteristics of higher performance CHSs. It is found that 10 of the 18 CHSs have devided students separately into academic-oriented and vocational-oriented groups in tenth grade which basically against the spirit of the comprehensive high school. The public schools in urban area applying both vocational and academic programs have better achievements. The reasons for better achievements of CHS include：(1) The more willingly the students join inner-school contests and the higher student-teacher rate a school has, the more students enter higher education level. It might be the urban schools normally with higher student-teacher rate. On the contrary the more students major in vocational program, the less the proportion of students enter higher education level. (2) The higher rate of teachers equipped with second speciality and the students majoring in vocational program, the higher the employment rate. (3) The more students take part in contests, the number of computers a school has for students to surf on the Internet, and the number of literature of teachers have published, the higher rate of getting technical certificate per student is. Conversely the more subsidy for each student doesn't guarantee higher rate of getting technical certificate per student. Therefore, the Ministry of Education should not use the subsidy as the main way to assist schools to transform, furthermore it ought to confine closely the qualification of the subsidized school to avoid those schools only looking for the subsidy but not the ideal of CHS.

本研究主要目的在瞭解我國目前執行試辦綜合高中政策的現況，並探討影響我國試辦綜合高中政策執行的相關因素及缺失，最後並根據研究結果，提出相關建議，供主管教育行政當局及試辦綜合高中學校之參考。 為達上述目的，本研究首先透過文獻探討，瞭解我國目前執行試辦綜合高中政策的現況以及教育政策執行的相關理論與研究，進而自編「我國試辦綜合高中政策執行影響因素調查問卷」。針對主管教育行政機關（教育部技術及職業教育司、教育部中部辦公室、北高兩市教育局）的教育行政人員，及八十五至八十七學年度台北市、高雄市、台灣省各縣市試辦綜合高中學校的學校行政人員、教師、家長採分層立意抽樣方式進行問卷調查，共得有效問卷492份。所得資料採用次數分配、百分比、卡方考驗、平均數等統計方法進行分析後，獲致下列主要結論： 一、我國綜合高中已正式成為後期中等教育階段的一種類型。 二、我國試辦綜合高中政策執行之影響因素可分為政策內容因素及政策系絡因素兩大部分，若能掌握影響教育政策執行之因素，將有助於政策的有效執行，以順利達成政策目標。 三、就政策內容因素而言，我國試辦綜合高中政策有明確的政策目標、充足的政策資源、適切的理論基礎，且對標的團體行為需改變的程度相當大。 四、就政策系絡因素而言，執行試辦綜合高中機關的內部溝通大致良好、執行人員具備專業能力及意願、執行人員與標的團體的溝通良好；但新聞傳播媒體、民意機關及社會大眾普遍對於我國試辦綜合高中政策沒有充分、清楚的認知。 五、我國試辦綜合高中政策於執行過程中遭遇宣導不足、升學主義、試辦動機、城鄉差距、人力不足、行政電腦化、教師第二專長進修、課程教學、學生管理輔導及學制過於複雜等缺失及問題。 六、教育部的教育行政人員之意見與其他類別人員之意見有相當大的落差。 最後根據以上之結論，提出相關建議供主管教育行政機關、試辦學校及後續研究者參考。

本研究之主要研究目的在於探討我國綜合高中之課程規劃與實施之現況、相關問題及具體改進建議，包含綜合高中教育基本理念之相關問題、課程規劃之相關問題以及課程實施之相關問題三個部分。為達成上述研究目的，研究者採用文獻分析法以及問卷調查法；首先探討課程規劃與實施的理論基礎與相關研究； 接著探討我國辦理綜合高中的相關理論基礎與研究；之後分析美國、英國與我國綜合高中的沿革與發展現況；最後編制『我國綜合高中課程規劃與實施現況問題之分析研究問卷』，針對2003學年度接受教育部綜合高中輔導訪視150所學校進行調查研究；然後依問卷回收後分析之結果，建議我國綜合高中課程規劃與實施可行之改進途徑，以提供相關單位決策及後續之研究。 本研究之問卷調查對象以學程主任、學科召集人、承辦綜合高中業務之組長或教務主任以及輔導人員為母群體。首先在學校部分進行普查，而學校相關教師樣本之取得則採取隨機抽樣而來，共抽取150所學校，900位教師，回收有效樣本為530份，問卷資料處理採用SPSS10.0版進行統計分析。 據此，研究者係將本研究之調查結果發現與文獻探討發現作成結論如下： 一、綜合高中教育基本理念未能落實 (一)就編班方面來說：學校未能落實高一不分流及依意願分類編班。 (二)就開始教授專業科目的時間來說：有部分的學校未能在「高二上」實行，高一未進行性向試探及輔導，即開始教授專業科目。 (三)就規劃綜合高中課程的主體來說：部分學校未能透過「該科老師於教學研究會時參與討論」之後，經由「課發會」進行協調，再由校務會議通過後實行。 (四)就各類課程及各學程課程之規劃經何種會議討論通過方面來說：仍有學校相關人員對此議題不甚清楚。 (五)就一年級職業試探課程之實施方式方面來說：仍有學校「未開設」或直接教授專業科目。 (六)就『高一不分流』、『提供多元課程』、『學生適性選課』這幾方面來說：各校由於理念不清，學校在各面向均自覺已符合綜合高中相關精神。 (七)就二、三年級學生選課之方式來說：仍有學校抱持選學程不能選課的觀念。 二、綜合高中課程規劃之意見調查分析 (一)就校訂必修科目數為多少學分數來說：仍有學校理念不清，將校訂必修學分數視為學程概念或「不清楚」，甚而無校訂必修科目。 (二)課程規劃以升學導向為主：課程規劃仍有考試領導課程規劃的情形。 (三)就學校在修訂或調整綜合高中課程時的決定主體方面來說：仍有學校決定主體未能落實綜合高中相關理念。 (四)就課程發展委員會之成員方面來說：學校課程發展委員會的家長代表及學者代表比例仍低。 (五)就生涯規劃課程由誰擔任方面來說：學校仍有配課的情形產生，未能給予學生專業的輔導。 (六)就規劃空白課程之單位以及學生遇空白課程時，負責到班或活動地點的負責老師方面而言：學校多數以「教務處」為主。 三、綜合高中課程實施之意見調查分析 (一)就學生空白課程節數方面而言：學校對綜合高中的理念並不清楚，因此大部分學校並無空白課程的實施。 (二)就學生改選科目方面的主要程序方面而言：學校輔導機制並未落實。 (三)就學生課表中之科目包含哪些類而言：課程的實施仍受限於升學導向的限制。 (四)就一年級學生說明有關綜合高中理念與具體做法之方式而言：學校便宜行事，使效果不彰。 本研究根據文獻探討、調查研究發現與結論作成以下建議： 一、強化綜合高中教育基本理念 (一)宣導綜合高中理念 (二)正確瞭解空白課程及職業試探的意義 二、綜合高中課程規劃之意見調查分析 (一)課程之規劃本著學校本位課程之精神，除教師積極參與之外，宜增加學者專家、社區及家長之意見 (二)課程規劃時，增加學生課程選修空間 (三)輔導人員需加強瞭解課程之規劃，以利輔導 (四)規劃空白課程及職業試探課程 (五)除升學及檢定科目之外，宜兼重人文素養之科目 三、綜合高中課程實施之意見調查分析 (一)豐富空白課程之內容及職業試探的廣度 (二)處室之間密切合作 (三)接受教育改革挑戰，行政上不宜方便行事 / The main purpose of this study was to explore the current situation, related issues and concrete suggestions of the curriculum planning and the curriculum implementation of Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan. This study had three parts: the related issues of basic educational ideals of Comprehensive High Schools, the curriculum planning and the curriculum implementation. To achieve above-mentioned goal, the researcher adopted literature review and questionnaire survey as research methods. First, the theories and related researches of the curriculum planning and implementation were reviewed, and then the development and current situation of Comprehensive High Schools in America, England and Taiwan were discussed. Finally the researcher made “Current Problems Analysis of the Curriculum Planning and Implementation of Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan Questionnaire” and took 150 schools interviewed and guided by the Ministry of Education in 2003 as samples to conduct the survey. According to the result of analyzing these questionnaires, suggestions of the improvement about Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan were offered for related authorities' execution and the following researches. The investigation took heads of programs, heads of subjects, the section chiefs or directors of academic affairs who are responsible for the affairs of the Comprehensive High School and the counselors. 900 teachers in 150 schools were randomly chosen as research samples and 530 valid copies were retrieved. The questionnaires were analyzed by conducting SPSS10.0 statistic software. The conclusion according to the result of this survey and findings of literature review are as follows, 1.The Incomplete Implementation of Educational Ideals of Comprehensive High Schools (1)Class Assignment：The implementation of integrating the academic and vocational programs for the first-grade students was incomplete and students were not grouped according their willing. (2)The Beginning Time to Teach the Professional Subjects：Students didn’t learn the professional subjects in the first semester of their second-grade years but during their first-grade yeas without accepting the aptitude tests. (3)The Subjectivity to Planning the Curriculum of Comprehensive High Schools：The implementation of the Curriculum didn’t follow the procedures of subject teachers’ discussion in the teaching committee, negotiation in the curriculum development committee and approval in the school affair conference. (4)The Conferences to Discuss and Approve the Curriculum of Different Programs：Some school staff didn't realize it clearly. (5)The Implementation of the Occupation Exploration Curriculum for the First-grade Students：Some schools didn’t provide it or taught students the subjects directly. (6)The Academic and Vocational Programs Integration during Students’ first year in High School, the Multiple Curriculum Offering and Adaptive Course Election：Schools had vague ideal and didn’t correspond to the spirits of the Comprehensive High School. (7)Curriculum Election for the Second and Third-Grade Students：Students couldn’t elect courses but programs. 2.The Analysis of the Survey about the Curriculum Planning of the Comprehensive High School (1)The Credits of the School Required Subjects：Some schools regarded the credits of school required subjects as the level of programs, ill-defined or not established. (2)The Exam-oriented Curriculum Planning：The curriculum planning relied on the exams. (3)The Subjectivity Deciding the Revision and Adjustment of the Curriculum of the Comprehensive High School：Some couldn’t put the ideal of Comprehensive High School into practice. (4)The Members of the Curriculum Development Committee：The participation rate of the representatives of parents and scholars in the curriculum development committee was low. (5)The Teachers Responsible for the Career Planning Curriculum：The career planning curricula were taught by teachers of different subjects and students didn't accept the professional counseling and guidance. (6)The Responsible Administration and Teachers of the Alternative Learning Period：The offices of academic affairs in schools were assigned. 3.The Analysis of the Survey about the Curriculum Implementation of the Comprehensive High School (1)The Number of Students' Alternative Learning Periods：Most school didn’t provide the null learning periods. (2)The Main Procedures of Students’ changing elective subjects：The counseling and guidance mechanism were not put into practice. (3)The Dimensions of the Subjects：The implementation of the curriculum was confined to the exam-orientation. (4)The Announcement to the First-grade students about the Ideal and Concrete Methods of the Comprehensive High School：The schools acted in haste and it turned out inefficiency. Suggestions according to the literature review, findings of the survey and the conclusion are as follows, 1.Strengthening the ideals of the Comprehensive High School (1) announcement of the ideal of the Comprehensive High School (2) to realize the meanings of the alternative learning periods and the occupation exploration curriculum 2.The Analysis of the survey of the Curriculum Planning of the Comprehensive High School (1)the curriculum planning according to the spirit of the school-based curriculum, teachers’ active participation and scholars, communities and parents’ suggestions adopted (2)flexibility of students’ selecting the elective courses (3)counselors’ deeper realization about the curriculum planning. (4)planning the alternative learning periods and the occupation exploration curriculum (5)emphasizing the subjects for the entrance examination, skill tests and humanities cultivation at the same time 3.The Analysis of the survey of the Curriculum Implementation of the Comprehensive High School (1)enriching the content of the alternative learning periods and broadening the occupation exploration (2)the close cooperation among offices in school (3)taking the challenges of educational reform

本研究旨在探討台灣綜合高中學生學習字彙時所運用的字彙學習策略，研究問題主要探討：學術學程及職業學程的學生在學習字彙時是否運用不同的字彙學習策略並找出其較常和較少使用之字彙學習策略，以及字彙學習高成就者和低成就者字彙學習策略之差異。藉此俾能提供英文老師幫助不同學程、成就的學生運用字彙學習策略，以期達到更佳的字彙學習成效。 本研究抽樣台北縣、市8所綜合高中共648位高三學生為調查對象，研究工具為字彙學習策略問卷與字彙能力測驗。分析方法主要採量化分析，包括獨立樣本t檢定、描述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關，本研究結果發現如下： 一、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異，學術學程的學生比職業學程的學生運用較多決定策略及記憶策略。 二、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率排序相同，在發現字義部份依序為決定策略、社會策略；在鞏固字義部份依序為認知策略、記憶策略、後設認知策略、社會策略。 三、字彙學習高成就者和低成就者之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異，高成就者比低成就者運用較多字彙學習策略。 最後，本文依據研究結果，提出老師英語教學上之應用及未來研究之建議。 / The purpose of this study was to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies used by comprehensive high school students in Taiwan. There were three questions focusing on the differences of use frequency of vocabulary learning strategies between academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students, the strategy use rank between these two groups of students, as well as the relation between vocabulary achievement and vocabulary learning strategy use frequency. A total of 648 students in Taipei City and Taipei County participated in the study. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire and a vocabulary achievement test were applied as instruments to obtain the data needed. Data from the students’ responses were computed and analyzed by means of independent-sample t-tests, descriptive statistics, and Spearman’s rank correlation. The findings of this study were summarized as follows. 1.There was a significant difference in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency between academic-oriented students and vocational-oriented students. The former applied more determination strategies to discover the meaning of a new word, and more memory strategies to consolidate the words encountered. 2.The ranking order of use frequency in vocabulary learning strategies by academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students was identical. In Part 1 (discovering the meaning of a new word), determination strategies were used most frequently, then followed by social strategies. In part 2 (consolidating the words encountered), cognitive strategies were used most frequently, followed by memory strategies, metacognitive strategies, and the last, social strategies. 3.There was a significant difference between good learners and poor learners in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency. Good learners applied more vocabulary learning strategies than poor learners to know an English word’s meaning. Based on the above results, some pedagogical implications for English teachers were developed and suggestions for future research were provided at the end of the study.

我國自1996年起開始試辦綜合高中，迄今已有十餘年。試辦綜合高中的目的在於促使我國後期中等教育能在高中、高職之外，提供另一條不同的選擇進路，俾使學生得以適性發展，學得多方面的知識，達到適性教育的目標。過去國內關於綜合高中分流政策的研究，大都集中在探討綜合高中的辦學績效和實施困難，而非該政策對學生學習成就的影響之探討。有鑑於此，本研究進一步探討：（1）哪些因素會影響國中畢業生選擇就讀普通高中和綜合高中學術導向組；（2）就讀綜合高中的學生，其學生學習成就是否優於就讀一般高中或高職；（3）綜合高中的課程分流政策是否能減少教育階層化的產生。 原始資料取自臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（Taiwan Education Panel Survey）公開使用版中的第一波到第四波國中追蹤樣本資料，並使用傾向分數配對法（Propensity Score Matching）探討上述三個研究目的。研究結果發現：(1)控制其它相關因素之後，過去學習成就和家庭社經背景愈佳者，愈有可能就讀普通高中及綜合高中學術導向組；(2)在學生學習成就表現上，就讀綜合高中的學生並不比就讀一般高中或高職的學生來得好；(3)綜合高中分流政策和制度性分流一樣，都會產生教育階層化現象。最後，本研究說明本研究結果對綜合高中分流政策的意涵，及提出研究建議供後續研究之用。 / Since 1996, Taiwan government launched the policy of Comprehensive High School (CHS) to relax the traditional system of curriculum tracking at the level of the senior secondary education. A number of studies and on-site evaluation reports on CHS have been made. So far, these studies and reports focused on exploring the performance of comprehensive high schools and difficulties in implementation of the policy. No evaluation of the impacts of the CHS policy on student achievement has yet been done. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the CHS policy on students’ achievement in the upper secondary education in Taiwan. This study attempts to answer the following research questions: (1) What factors influence junior-high school graduates’ decision on attending general high schools, and the academic track in comprehensive high schools? (2) Do students enrolling in comprehensive high schools perform better academically than those enrolling in general or vocational high schools? (3) Do curriculum tracking in comprehensive high schools enhance or reduce inequality in educational achievement? Using the data from the public released core panel data of the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) in 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007, this study employs the method of propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate the average treatment effect of CHS policy on student achievement. All results of PSM analysis indicate that (1) all else being equal, students with higher prior student achievement and better socio-economic backgrounds have more opportunities to enroll in an academic track, including senior high schools and the academic track in comprehensive high schools, than those with lower level of prior achievement or socio-economic backgrounds; (2) for those enrolled in comprehensive high schools, there is virtually no gain in student achievement from the CHS policy; and (3) tracking in comprehensive high schools produce inequality in educational achievement, which is similar to tracking between general and vocational high schools. Finally, the present study discusses the implications of the CHS policy and suggests directions for future research.