1 |
胡風事件的再思考 / Reflections on the Hu Feng Incident劉至剛, Liu, Zhi Gan Unknown Date (has links)
欲探尋中共和知識份子的關係,必先回顧其歷史發展。早在1940年代,中共已藉由「整風運動」,發展出一套「馴服」和「利用」知識份子的辦法。1949年中共建立新政權,更將此邏輯推及全國,對於當代中國知識份子而言,無疑是一巨大變化與挑戰。
胡風,作為一位與中共關係密切的作家、知識份子,其政治立場向來親共,乃被中共視為「同路人」。儘管如此,胡風仍有諸多意見,未能與中共全然契合。1954年,胡風向中共中央遞交「萬言書」,直陳中共文藝政策的缺失。1955年,毛澤東欽定「胡風反革命集團」一案,胡風和友人多遭逮捕、審查,並牽連甚廣。胡風一派因言獲罪,堪稱中共建政以來首宗「文字獄」,亦為重大政治冤獄。
本研究以胡風事件為主軸,圍繞胡風其人進行個案研究。第一章為導論,簡述本文研究動機,以及當代以來中國知識份子的思想變化。第貳章、第叁章為胡風之個人歷史,描述胡風求學、出洋、創作、涉入政治的人生歷程,作為討論胡風事件的背景介紹。第肆章為主文,詳述胡風事件的原委,進一步探討胡風事件的成因,分析中共黨政高層(特別是毛澤東)所扮演之關鍵決策角色,藉此釐清其政治責任。第伍章結論,為筆者的研究心得和展望。透過胡風事件的探究,筆者針對毛澤東的個人權威、中共與知識份子的特殊關係,以及中共政治文化提出檢討。 / To realize the relationship between the CCP and the intellectuals, we should review the historical development. Early in the 1940s, the CCP has already progressed the method of “using” the intellectuals. In 1949, the new regime was built by the CCP. Furthermore, they spread this strategy to whole mainland. Obviously, it was a big change and challenge to the contemporary Chinese intellectuals. Hu Feng, as an intellectual and a “comrade”, whose political position had been closed to the CCP. However, Hu Feng still had some opinions which differ from the CCP. In 1954, Hu Feng submitted his proposal which criticizing the CCP’s literature and art policy. In 1955, Mao ZeDong judged this case as “Hu Feng counterrevolutionary group”. After that, Hu Feng and his companions were arrested and investigated by the government. The Hu Feng Incident seemed to be such a literary persecution and injustice case.
This research mainly focuses on the Hu Feng Incident. Firstly, Chapter 1 is the “Introduction”, which introduces the reasons of this research and the changing thought of modern Chinese intellectuals. Secondly, the focus of Chapter 2 is the life course and career pattern of Hu Feng. Chapter3 is the narration of the big change to the intellectuals on 1949. Chapter 4, which includes the main idea of this research, not only analyzes the causes of the Hu Feng Incident, but also seeks the crucial role of Mao. In Conclusion, Chapter 5 summarized the reflection and the vision upon this research. The writer reviews Mao’s personal authority and the political culture of the CCP. Finally, the special relationship between the CCP and the Chinese intellectuals will still be a major issue, that will need further study on it.
|
Page generated in 0.0121 seconds