觀察農村社區土地重劃現況後發現，雖然自民國76年起為能有效解決農村社區公共設施不足及營造農村社區整體優良環境，開始辦理農漁村社區更新；至民國89年1月公布實施「農村社區土地重劃條例」，且內政部編列「農村社區土地重劃四年示範計畫」，為持續改善農村社區生活環境，內政部接續農村社區土地重劃四年示範計畫訂定「農村社區土地重劃六年（98至103年度）示範計畫」，預定投入經費14億6千萬元，辦理先期規劃40區、非都市土地開發許可區28區、工程設計23區、重劃建設17區。截至民國100年止，農村社區土地重劃之地區，包含先期規劃149區及重劃建設區數53區，但實際建設的農村社區並未有預期的效果，當地人口也未如預期增加，新增加的建築用地亦未有新建案或住宅，而原來的農田亦無法再變為耕地，此引發本研究進一步探究之動機。 本研究從農村社區土地重劃區位與其施行效益角度出發，回顧農村社區土地重劃之意義、特性及發展歷程的資料蒐集，初步瞭解辦理農村社區土地重劃之現況及區位評選機制，從農村社區之政策分析、執行之檢討及相關個案與綜合分析中，歸納分析台灣農村社區土地重劃政策與執行狀況，並以中央及地方執行機關與農村社區居民、地主為對象進行問卷調查，研究個案新竹市香山區港南農村社區土地重劃、新竹市北區南勢農村社區土地重劃、新竹縣新豐鄉埔和農村社區土地重劃、彰化縣員林鎮大饒農村社區土地重劃及彰化縣大村鄉過溝農村社區土地重劃五個農村社區。最後，獲致以下幾點結論： 一、鄰近重要公共建設、都市計畫邊緣及交通較完善之區位條件，其施行效益較高，如調查之彰化縣大饒農村社區及新竹市香山區港南農村社區土地重劃。 二、中央各相關主管機關需因地制宜，訂定更嚴格審查標準，才能避免任意擴充範圍。 三、農村社區土地重劃應考量住宅需求及對當地居民生活品質改善程度，營造優質的農村生活環境才得以使原有聚落人口回流。 四、避免造成農村蔓延發展，依不同區位條件運用不同改善方式，區位條件好者，以農村社區土地重劃為主；區位條件不好者以農村社區公共設施改善為主。

目前台灣地區農村發展之生產與生活面功能係由農地重劃、農村社區土地重劃及農地興建農舍等三個制度執行來達成，其中透過農地重劃達經濟面之生產功能，而藉由農村社區土地重劃與農地興建農舍制度提供生活面之需求。然制度個別執行之結果，不僅導致生產農地之破壞與流失，亦增加農地利用之交易成本。面臨這些問題，生產農地之維護為當務之急。雖然長期以來農地重劃為維護農地生產力之主要制度，但由於農地重劃之發展受到制度變遷路徑相依之影響，不易因應社會變遷而改變其只具單一生產功能之制度內涵，故若要同時達到農村地區之生產與生活功能，或可透過農地重劃之制度調整解決問題並兼顧生產與生活功能之農村發展。 　　因此本研究基於制度變遷之理論基礎，針對台灣地區實施農地重劃之制度變遷進行分析，探討於社經環境變動過程，農地重劃所扮演角色之轉變，以為檢視現行農地重劃制度問題之基礎。並透過政府嘗試結合辦理農地重劃與農村社區土地重劃進行個案分析，揭示目前農村地區追求生產與生活功能同時兼備之必要性，以及於現行制度環境下，二個制度進行結合辦理之制度調整方向，產生了執行時程、重劃負擔及土地分配等問題與困難。故本研究進一步提出三個制度調整方案，利用ANP之多準則決策分析方法，評選出於多功能農地重劃之制度調整發展方向，為兼顧生產與生活等多功能目標之最佳制度調整方案。此外，針對多功能農地重劃制度之調整提出制度環境面與執行機制面之政策性建議，期望能對正在研擬與即將立法之農村再生條例草案中，整合型農地重劃之研擬與方向，提供於制度結合或制度創新上有所助益。 / Farmland consolidation institution in Taiwan has only been applied to improve the production environment during the past 50 years. Nowadays, due to the dramatic change of social and economic environment in Taiwan as well as the tendency of multifunctional rural community and agricultural development, the institution is due to proper consideration to be altered. In addition, the separately enforcement of three institutions i.e. farmland consolidation, building of farmhouse and rural community consolidation, results in the serious pollution of agricultural environment and the loss of high- quality farmland. How to adjust the current institution of farmland consolidation so as to reach the objectives of both better production and living environment in rural areas is an important issue. This study, based on the institutional change theory, investigates the changing role of farmland consolidation in Taiwan. Moreover, examines the problems of integrating farmland consolidation and rural community land readjustment at Shihfen area located in Tainan County Cigou Towship is examined. After literatures review and the investigation of farmhouse as well as farmland use problems, proposes three alternative institutions of farmland consolidation. Analytical Network Process (ANP) Approach is employed to evaluate. Furthermore, the criteria and implication of the choosing institution are discussed so as to benefit the framework of integrated farmland consolidation in the Bill of the Revival of Rural Community.

政府自民國七十六年起，即以土地重劃方式試辦農村社區土地重劃，且陸續針對農村社區相關民生公共建設制訂相關法規，於民國八十九年公佈實施【農村社區土地重劃條例】，使農村辦理整體建設配合地籍重整及交換分合有法源的依據。不過，農村社區土地重劃業務實施至民國九十六年底，已進行農村社區土地重劃建設之社區僅有四十八個，所佔比例甚低，且農村社區土地重劃實施之內容，僅偏重在公共設施之硬體建設，以應居住生活之需，然其與農地重劃之配合，及其對生態環境之維護卻顯得十分不足，理當進一步檢討與改進。再者，放眼國際，知悉國外農村土地重劃制度之演化值得我國省思，尤其是德國之農村土地重劃實施百年之經驗別具特色，該國不僅著眼在調整坵塊型態及耕地結構等方面，同時也配合農村發展策略與自然景觀維護，以發揮農村地區生態與景觀維護之功能。由此知悉現代化土地重劃已不再僅是改善農業生產結構之手段，而是被視為一種多目標的農村發展工具。 因此，本研究主要運用文獻分析法、案例研究法及深度訪談法，對欲擬列探討之課題作深入的研究。收集國內外農村社區土地重劃相關文獻，包括：農村規劃的理論和方法，及相關法律規定與案例等，從中探悉如德國等先進國家藉由推動農村土地重劃以促進農村發展的經驗；另針對目前台灣農村社區土地重劃的功能及實施過程所遭遇之問題等項目加以探討，並透過深度訪談之方式，以瞭解地方居民的想法與意見，並觀察重劃後之發展是否達到其原先設定規劃之目標與效益，再藉由德國實施農村土地重劃之規劃原則，加以檢討我國重劃制度之方向與問題，最後研提未來的改進方案，以供有關當局之參酌。 / The government has been trying to readjust the rural community by land consolidation, and formulate relevant laws and regulations one after another on public construction, which is related to people's livelihood of the rural community. In the 89th year, the government published the “Regulations on Land consolidation in Rural Communities”, serving as the source of law in the steady implementation of the cooperation between the overall construction and the re-construction of rural communities, as well as the exchange of cadastral division. However, in the end of the 96th year of R.O.C., the implementation of re-zoning the land of rural communities has only covered 48 communities, which have been readjusted and re-constructed. The proportion is very low. What’s more, as to the content of the implementation, it focused on hardware construction of public facilities to meet the needs of living. Speaking of its relationship between agriculture and land consolidation and its impact on the maintenance of the ecological environment, it is insufficient. We should further review and improve it. Furthermore, if we look into the international situation, we will figure out the evolution of foreign systems of rural land consolidation. Especially in Germany's rural land consolidation, the experience of implementing the consolidation of the rural land for a hundred years is unique. It focuses not only on Hill block patterns and adjusting the structure of arable land aspects, but also on trying to be in line with the rural development strategy and the maintenance of the natural landscape, so as to play the ecological function and the function of landscape maintenance in rural areas. From this, it is known that the modernization of land consolidation is no longer a means which is only to improve the structure of agricultural production, but seen as a rural development instrument with plural goals. Accordingly, the present study will makes use of literature analysis, case studies and depth interviews so as to make an in-depth research on those tasks which are planned to be discussed. The collection of relevant literature on domestic and rural community land consolidation includes: theories and methods on rural planning and relevant legal provisions and precedents, from which we can try to pry into the experience of promoting the development of rural areas by initiating the consolidation of rural land provided by developed countries like Germany. Moreover, after dabbling into the present functions of the land consolidation in rural communities of Taiwan and the problems encountered in the implementation process, we should also try to understand the ideas and views of local residents through the way of depth interviews and observe if the original goal and benefits are attained after the readjusted. Still, we should check the direction and problems of our consolidation systems by comparing with the regulations and principles adopted by Germany when it carried out the implementation of land consolidation and finally make a proposal for programs of future improvement for the light of relevant authorities.