Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-03-15T12:58:06Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_JEFFERSON_ROBERTO_BAHNERT_SANTOS_COMPLETO.pdf: 6757160 bytes, checksum: 63f08ba3b75f39b7ad77b1b9561d40bc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T12:58:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_JEFFERSON_ROBERTO_BAHNERT_SANTOS_COMPLETO.pdf: 6757160 bytes, checksum: 63f08ba3b75f39b7ad77b1b9561d40bc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003-05-15 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / The Noegus genus was proposed by Simon in 1990 for spiders of Salticidae family and Amicinae subfamily from neotropical region. Nowadays there are twenty four valid species and one that's considered species inquirenda. From all the described valid species, nineteen are represented just for males, two for males and females and three for females. Through the revision of Noegus genus, the type of fifteen species are rewrited, and the synonym of five species are proposed. For the first time females from eight species are being described. Males and females from two new species are also described resulting in 21 valid species. / O g?nero Noegus foi proposto por Simon em 1900 para aranhas da fam?lia Salticidae da subfam?lia Amicinae da regi?o neotropical e conta, hoje, com vinte e quatro esp?cies v?lidas e uma considerada species inquirenda. Do total das esp?cies descritas v?lidas dezenove est?o representadas apenas pelos machos, duas por machos e f?meas e tr?s pelas f?meas. Atrav?s da revis?o do g?nero Noegus, redescreve-se os tipos de 15 esp?cies, propondo a sinon?mia de cinco esp?cies. Descreve-se pela primeira vez as f?meas de oito esp?cies. S?o descritas machos e f?meas de duas esp?cies novas. Resultando em 21 esp?cies v?lidas.

Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-05-10T12:58:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_MIGUEL_MACHADO_DA_SILVA_COMPLETO.pdf: 15007852 bytes, checksum: 9e641d49b212e2404ad8eb2c392c577e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-05-10T12:58:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_MIGUEL_MACHADO_DA_SILVA_COMPLETO.pdf: 15007852 bytes, checksum: 9e641d49b212e2404ad8eb2c392c577e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-10 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Since the original proposition of Thomisidae, much has been discussed about its taxonomy and intra-family relations. The subfamily Stephanopinae comprises individuals characterized by the presence of cheliceral teeth and by the anterior legs stronger and larger than the posterior ones, however, the monophyly of this group has not been corroborated due their dubious diagnostic characters and by the lack of revisional studies on several of its component genera. A phylogenetic analysis followed by a morphological revision of the spider genus Tobias Simon, 1895 are performed. The analysis is based on a matrix with 29 terminal taxa (7 in ingroup and 22 in outgroup) scored for 87 morphological characters. The implied weighting analysis resulted in one most parcimonious tree with 294 steps obtained in 16 distortion groups, which support that Tobias is paraphyletic with Epicadus Simon, 1895, and considered its junior synonym. Onocolus Simon, 1895 emerge as the sister group of Epicadus. Epicadus pulcher Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov. is considered senior synonym of Epicadus epicadoides Mello-Leit?o comb. nov., 1944 and Epicadus regius Birab?n, 1955 comb. nov., Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909 is proposed as senior synonym of Epicadus inermis Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov., Epicadus camelinus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869) comb. nov. is considered senior synonym of Epicadus martinezi Birab?n, 1955 comb. nov. and Epicadus trituberculatus (Taczanowski, 1872) comb. nov. is considered senior synonym of Epicadus paraguayensis Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov. and Epicadus planus Mello-Leit?o, 1932. New distribution records and redescriptions are provided. The species latter described in Tobias, Epicadus caudatus Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov., Epicadus pustulosus Mello-Leit?o comb. nov., 1929, and also the original species Epicadus heterogaster (Gu?rin, 1829) and Epicadus rubripes Mello-Leit?o, 1924 were recently revised, thus, they were not described in the present study. After the cladistics analysis, Epicadus now comprises 9 species. / Desde a proposi??o original de Thomisidae, muito se tem discutido a respeito de sua taxonomia e rela??es intrafamiliares. A subfam?lia Stephanopinae ? formada por indiv?duos caracterizados pela presen?a de dentes nas quel?ceras e pernas anteriores maiores e mais robustas que as posteriores, no entanto, a monofilia deste grupamento n?o tem sido corroborada em fator dos caracteres diagn?sticos d?bios e pelo grande n?mero de g?neros que ainda n?o foram submetidos a estudos revisivos. No presente trabalho s?o apresentadas uma an?lise clad?stica e uma revis?o taxonomica do g?nero Tobias Simon, 1895. A an?lise ? baseada em uma matriz com 29 t?xons terminais (7 no grupo interno e 22 no grupo externo) e 87 caracteres morfol?gicos. A an?lise de pesagem impl?cita resultou em uma ?rvore mais parcimoniosa obtida em 16 grupos de distor??o e com 294 passos, que suportam Tobias como um grupo parafil?tico com Epicadus Simon, 1895, e seu sin?nimo j?nior. Onocolus Simon, 1895 surgiu como grupo irm?o de Epicadus. Epicadus pulcher Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov. ? considerado sin?nimo s?nior de Epicadus epicadoides Mello-Leit?o comb. nov., 1944 e Epicadus regius Birab?n, 1955 comb. nov., Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909 ? proposto como sin?nimo s?nior de Epicadus inermis Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov., Epicadus camelinus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869) comb. nov. ? considerado sin?nimo s?nior de Epicadus martinezi Birab?n, 1955 comb. nov. e Epicadus trituberculatus (Taczanowski, 1872) comb. nov. ? considerado sin?nimo s?nior de Epicadus paraguayensis Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov. e Epicadus planus Mello-Leit?o, 1932. Novos registros de distribui??o e redescri??es s?o apresentados para as esp?cies supracitadas. As esp?cies anteriormente descritas em Tobias, Epicadus caudatus Mello-Leit?o comb. nov., 1929 e Epicadus pustulosus Mello-Leit?o, 1929 comb. nov., juntamente com Epicadus heterogaster (Gu?rin, 1829) e Epicadus rubripes Mello-Leit?o, 1929 foram redescritas recentemente e portanto n?o foram inclu?das no presente estudo. Ap?s a an?lise clad?stica, Epicadus agora compreende 9 esp?cies.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:09:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 453999.pdf: 11077800 bytes, checksum: 3e05ff8e4977adc261dae6e129f932be (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998-12-28 / The genus Vinnius was proposed by Simon in 1902. The species included in it up to now are: Vinnius subfasciatus (C. L. Koch, 1846), Vinnius maculaticeps Simon, 1902, Vinnius uncatus Simon, 1902, Vinnius carinatus Simon, 1902, Vinnius calcarifer Simon, 1902, Vinnius lartiguei Simon, 1903, Vinnius petropolis (MeIlo-Leit?o, 1943), Vinnius reticulatus Mello-Leit?o, 1943 and Vinnius paranaensis Mello-Leit?o, 1947, all from the Neotropical Region. After the examen of the types of all species it was possible to evidence that Vinnius calcarifer Simon, 1902 and Vinnius carinatus Simon, 1902 are not congeneric with Vinnius maculaticeps Simon, 1902, the type-species selected by him for the new proposed genus. Supported by this fact, two new genera are proposed. The genus Arnoliseus, with two species, A. caicarifer (Simon, 1902), a new combination and A. graciosa sp.n. and the genus Frespera also with two species, F. carinata (Simon, 1902), new combination and F. meridionalis sp.n. Vinnius maculaticeps is consideres a junior synonym of Vinnius subfasciatus (C.L.Koch, 1846), Vinnius Iartiguei Simon, 1903 of Vinnius uncatus Simon, 1902 and Vinnius paranaensis Mello-Leit?o, 1947 of Vinnius calcarifer. Vinnius reticulatus Mello-Leit?o, 1942 is transfered to the genus Chira. Vinnius petropolis is considered a species Inquirenda. After this study the genus Vinnius remains with only four species: Vinnius subfasciatus (C. L. Koch, 1846), Vinnius uncatus Simon, 1902, and the two new ones herein proposed Vinnius buzius sp.n. and Vinnius camacan sp.n. The females of Arnoliseus calcarifer (Simon, 1902) and, F. carinata (Simon, 1902) are described for the first time. / O g?nero Vinnius Simon, 1902, apresenta nove esp?cies: V. subfasciatus (C. L. Koch, 1846), Vinnius maculaticeps Simon, 1902, V. Uncatus Simon, 1902, V. carinatus Simon, 1902, V. calcarifer Simon, 1902, V. Iartiguei Simon, 1903, V. petropolis (Mello-Leit?o, 1943), V. reticulatus Meio-Leit?o, 1943, V. paranaensis Mello-Leit?o, 1947 todas Neotropicais. Com o estudo dos tipos, p?de- se comprovar que Vinnius calcarifer Simon, 1902 e V. carinatus Simon, 1902 n?o s?o congen?ricas com V. maculaticeps Simon, 1902, esp?cie-tipo do g?nero, o que torna possivel a proposi??o de dois novos g?neros. Prop?e-se o g?nero Arnoliseus para abrigar A. calcarifer (Simon, 1902) comb. nov, e mais uma nova esp?cie; A. graciosa sp.n e o g?nero Frespera para abrigar F. carinata (Simon, 1902) comb. nov e Frespera meridionalis sp.n. Vinnius maculaticeps ? considerado sin?nimo j?nior de Vinnius subfasciatus; V. lartiguei de V. Uncatus, V. paranaensis Mello-Leit?o de A. calcarifer, e V. reticulatus ? transferido para Chira. Vinnius petropolis ? considerado species Inquirenda. O g?nero Vinnius fica restrito ? apenas quatro esp?cies; V. subfasciatus, V. uncatus e duas novas; V. buzius sp.n. e V. camacan sp.n. Descreve-se pela primeira vez, as f?meas de A. calcarifer (Simon, 1902) e Frespera carinata (Simon, 1902).