No description available.

No description available.

Current UK abortion law has been subjected to extensive feminist critique because of the relationships that it constructs between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and women with unwanted pregnancies. The law allows HCPs to opt out of abortion provision on the grounds of conscience, implying that it is not something which they have an automatic duty to provide to their patients. It also gives doctors the authority to decide whether an abortion can legally take place, thus suggesting that women’s reproductive decisions should be regulated by medical ‘experts’. However, little is known about how HCPs who are involved in twenty-first century UK abortion provision define their relationships with their patients in practice. My thesis makes an important empirical contribution by responding to this gap in the literature and exploring the subjectivities which these HCPs construct for themselves and their pregnant patients. I address this issue by analysing Scottish HCPs’ interview accounts of their involvement in (or conscientious objection to) abortion provision, using conceptual tools provided by Science and Technology Studies (STS) and feminist theory. I begin by utilising HCPs’ discussions of the practice of ‘conscientious objection’ as a means of exploring how they define the boundaries of their professional responsibilities for abortion provision. I then move on to address HCPs’ accounts of their interactions with women requesting abortion, and analyse how they define legitimate or ‘expert’ knowledge in this context. A key conclusion of the thesis is that HCPs do concede some authority to women with unwanted pregnancies; this is revealed by their reluctance to suggest that they have the right to prevent individual women from accessing abortion. At the same time, I argue that the legitimacy granted to pregnant women by HCPs is limited. My analysis reveals that, in constructing knowledge claims about the use of abortion, HCPs co-produce troubling definitions of femininity, socio-economic class, age and ethnicity. I develop a strong critique of this process, and highlight its potential implications for women’s experiences in the abortion clinic. However, I conclude that this situation cannot be addressed by simply attacking the practices of HCPs as individuals. Rather, it is necessary to understand and critique the limitations of the discursive context in which HCPs are working, because this context shapes the subjectivities available to pregnant women and HCPs.

No description available.

No description available.

The impact of a termination on subsequent pregnancy outcomes has been widely studied. It has been suggested that women who terminate a pregnancy are more likely to have an adverse outcome of a subsequent pregnancy, either miscarriage, or a preterm or low birthweight baby. However, the evidence to date is inconclusive and in some cases contradictory. Hypothesis: It is hypothesised that those who had terminated their first pregnancy are more likely to have an adverse outcome of a subsequent pregnancy, (either miscarriage, preterm delivery (<37 weeks), or low birthweight ((<2500g) as a proxy for gestation). They are also more likely to have shorter gestation at miscarriage, and the gestation at miscarriage is associated with method of termination. Also, women are more likely to show a dose-response in three-pregnancy series, with increasing numbers of consecutive terminations associated with increasingly poorer outcomes. Data and Methodology: Setting and Sample: Aberdeen maternity hospital (AMH) is the level III consultant-led maternity unit for NHS North of Scotland Region. It provides care for pregnant women both with and without complications and for sick neonates. The data were extracted from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND), with the sample restricted to Aberdeen city women in 1970-1999, and only singleton pregnancy events were included. Outcomes The study group was Termination-Birth (TB) and this group was compared to three comparison pregnancy history groups, Miscarriage-Birth (MB), Birth-Birth (BB) and Birth (B). The outcomes are preterm and low birthweight deliveries and the sub-categories of preterm and low birthweight. In addition, miscarriage on the index event is also considered as an outcome. Methods: The distributions of gestation and birthweight were examined between and within study groups for outcomes of preterm and low birthweight deliveries, and logistic and multinomial regression was used to assess the impact of selected potentially confounding socio-demographic and pregnancy related characteristics on the odds of delivering at different levels of preterm and low birthweight by pregnancy history. The gestation at miscarriage of the index subsequent event is also examined between study groups, as is the method of termination for women whose first pregnancy was terminated. In addition, two and three pregnancy sequences are examined to determine if there was a ‘dose-response’ effect of termination of pregnancy. Results: For women from group TB, the overall difference in average adjusted gestation at delivery is approximately 1 day less for women from group TB compared to women from group MB, and only 2 days from women with only a history of births, these results could be considered clinically insignificant. This thesis has shown that compared with women with a previous birth, and after adjusting for possible confounding factors, births after a previous termination were consistently more likely to result in a preterm delivery. Women who terminated a first pregnancy have an increased likelihood of preterm delivery from a public health perspective, with an overall 40% increase in risk for preterm birth for women from group TB when compared to women from group B (OR 1.35 95%CI 1.15, 1.58). These increased odds of preterm delivery for group TB are very similar to those for women from group MB (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.18, 1.79). Similarly, after adjustment for potential confounding factors, women from group TB were consistently more likely to deliver a low birthweight baby, when compared to women with from group B, (OR 1.18 95%CI 1.00, 1.38). Women from group MB were also significantly more likely to deliver a low birthweight baby after adjustment for possible confounding factors (OR 1.42 95%CI 1.16, 1.72). Few if any of the explanatory variables are directly modifiable, and the PAF associated with women from group TB is relatively small, when compared to other significant potential risk factors. Women who terminated a first pregnancy were significantly more likely, after adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics to miscarry late (OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.07, 2.84), but there was no difference between medical and surgical terminations. Finally, there was no evidence of a dose response of termination for either preterm or low birthweight deliveries, although there was marked evidence of a dose response of miscarriage. Conclusions The results from a clinical and public health point of view may appear to be contradictory, in that there is an approximate 40% increase in relative risk for preterm delivery, but only an adjusted absolute difference of two days lower gestation at birth for women from group TB. PAF findings indicate only a small overall reduction in the number of preterm deliveries if the exposure to the risk factor of a previous termination was eliminated. Women who undergo a termination should therefore receive full information on factors which might have an influence on the outcome of a subsequent pregnancy, and in addition medical information given to the women should cover details about the termination process, including methods of termination, possible complications, post termination follow up and future contraception.

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1986 W74 / Master of Science / Animal Science and Industry

M.A. / This dissertation evaluates the concept of a third alternative surrounding abortion which focuses on making abortion rare by addressing contemporary arguments. This third alternative recognises abortion as morally problematic but contends that it should be both legal and rare. Its aim is to address the overly narrow focus of the usual debate on either just the foetus or just the maternal body. In doing this it evaluates some of the current contemporary arguments surrounding abortion to show how these arguments are simply not enough. This includes questioning the social and political dimensions of the dilemma of abortion, and in particular, questions about the conditions that should be in place that will help make abortion rare. This should show how the current debate has created a clear division which has done very little to help women who are considering an abortion. Therefore the argument of making abortion rare should be supported by both Pro-Life and Pro-Choice arguments because if abortion became rare, it would mean that not only would there be fewer abortions, which is exactly what Pro-Life is arguing for, but it would also mean that women would be given more options, which is what Pro-Choice is arguing for.

Government began legislating abortion in the mid nineteenth century and has controlled access to this service for women ever since. With the creation of hospital boards after WWII, state control over access became further entrenched. Regulations and restrictions since Roe v. Wade limit the availability of abortion services for women served by Medicaid and other social assistance programs. The existence of a class bias around access can be seen throughout the topic's history and legislation has unfairly targeted and therefore disproportionately affects poor women. The data show that these restrictions have no impact on the number of unintended pregnancies over the last 20 plus years. Without the ability to personally fund the procedure, poor women do not enjoy the same choices as women in other social classes. In the next decade, we are likely to experience more of the same without having a realistic conversation about Medicaid funding of abortion.

A Dissertation that is being submitted for an MMed in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in partial fulfilment of the FCOG (SA) Part II 07 April 2015 / Objectives: The main objective of this study was to characterise women who presented at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH) between 12 and 20 weeks for termination of pregnancy (TOP). Secondary objectives were to determine time to abortion, compare sonar gestational age to gestational age by dates and reasons for late presentation. Method: This was a prospective cohort study of women over the age of 18 who were referred to CHBAH for second trimester TOP between August 2012 and May 2013. The exclusion criteria were pregnancies more advanced than 20 weeks gestation. Data was collected from the medical file and by interview. Demographics and reasons to terminate were extracted from the files. Outcome variables included bleeding, pain, and time to abortion. Results: One hundred and ninety one women (91.39%) aborted. The median age of women was 25.00 (IQR=21.00-31.00), range (18-43). Women older than 25 years were 33% less likely to abort than women less than 25 years of age. Ninety nine women (47.14%) bled severely. One woman had a uterine perforation following evacuation of the uterus. The median gestational age by sonar was14.71 (IQR=13.86-16.14), range (13.00-20.00). The median gestational age by dates was13.57 (IQR=12.29-15.00), range (4.14-26.28). One hundred and thirty five women (63.98%) had an MVA for RPOC using analgesia following medical induction. Two women (0.95%) needed hysterotomy following failed TOP. The median time to abortion was 11.50(IQR=8.67-17.92), range (3.50-69.33) and incidence rate of 0.5 per hour or 1 per 2hours. Conclusion: The majority of women (91%) aborted within 72 hours following medical induction with less complication rate and short induction to abortion time. This affirm misoprostol efficacy as the suitable drug for conducting second trimester medical TOP. / MT2016