A glândula acessória (GA) e o ducto primário (DP) fazem parte do aparelho glandular de veneno da serpente Bothrops jararaca. Existem poucos estudos envolvendo a GA e o DP e ainda há controvérsias se as secreções liberadas por estas regiões podem modificar o veneno formado. Nossos resultados mostraram que a GA apresenta um epitélio secretor simples com células secretoras mucosas, células seromucosas, células ricas em mitocôndrias sem secreção, células horizontais, células basais e células dark. E o DP apresenta um epitélio pseudo-estratificado com células secretoras colunares com vesículas com diferentes eletrodensidades, células ricas em mitocôndrias, células dark, células basais e células horizontais. Observamos que a GA e o DP possuem um ciclo de produção e secreção longo semelhante à glândula principal de veneno. Além disso, mostramos pela primeira vez que a secreção da GA não participa na formação do veneno total e sugerimos que a secreção liberada pelo DP possa participar do veneno total e seja esta secreção o motivo das controvérsias existentes na literatura. / The accessory gland (AG) and the primary duct (PD) are components of the venom gland apparatus of Bothrops jararaca snake. There are few studies about AG and PD and there is still controversy on whether the secretions released by these regions can modify the total venom. Our results show that AG presents simple secretory epithelium with mucous secretory cells, seromucous cells, mitochondria-rich cells without secretion, horizontal cells, basal cells and dark cells. The PD duct presents pseudo-stratified epithelium with secretory columnar cells with different electrodensity vesicles, mitochondria-rich cells, dark cells, basal cells and horizontal cells. We also observed that the AG and the PD have a long cycle of synthesis and secretion as the main venom gland. Furthermore, we show for the first time that the secretion of AG does not participate in the formation of the whole venom and suggest that the secretion released by PD could contribute to the total venom and this secretion could be the subject of controversy in the literature.

A glândula acessória (GA) e o ducto primário (DP) fazem parte do aparelho glandular de veneno da serpente Bothrops jararaca. Existem poucos estudos envolvendo a GA e o DP e ainda há controvérsias se as secreções liberadas por estas regiões podem modificar o veneno formado. Nossos resultados mostraram que a GA apresenta um epitélio secretor simples com células secretoras mucosas, células seromucosas, células ricas em mitocôndrias sem secreção, células horizontais, células basais e células dark. E o DP apresenta um epitélio pseudo-estratificado com células secretoras colunares com vesículas com diferentes eletrodensidades, células ricas em mitocôndrias, células dark, células basais e células horizontais. Observamos que a GA e o DP possuem um ciclo de produção e secreção longo semelhante à glândula principal de veneno. Além disso, mostramos pela primeira vez que a secreção da GA não participa na formação do veneno total e sugerimos que a secreção liberada pelo DP possa participar do veneno total e seja esta secreção o motivo das controvérsias existentes na literatura. / The accessory gland (AG) and the primary duct (PD) are components of the venom gland apparatus of Bothrops jararaca snake. There are few studies about AG and PD and there is still controversy on whether the secretions released by these regions can modify the total venom. Our results show that AG presents simple secretory epithelium with mucous secretory cells, seromucous cells, mitochondria-rich cells without secretion, horizontal cells, basal cells and dark cells. The PD duct presents pseudo-stratified epithelium with secretory columnar cells with different electrodensity vesicles, mitochondria-rich cells, dark cells, basal cells and horizontal cells. We also observed that the AG and the PD have a long cycle of synthesis and secretion as the main venom gland. Furthermore, we show for the first time that the secretion of AG does not participate in the formation of the whole venom and suggest that the secretion released by PD could contribute to the total venom and this secretion could be the subject of controversy in the literature.

Sperm competition is a widely-recognized and powerful selective force. Male accessory glands are organs found across animal taxa that can influence sperm performance, and thus may be selected for in competitive contexts. In fishes, these organs are in fact rare, but display great diversity in form and function across species. Although the accessory gland is known to play a role in mate attraction, parental care, fertilization, or post-copulatory competition in a few select species, the role of this organ remains a mystery in most species. Many fishes with accessory glands also exhibit alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs), which add an extra layer of complexity to how species respond to sperm competition. Because males of different ARTs typically experience different levels of sperm competition risk, it’s possible they may differentially invest in accessory glands to overcome this competition. In this thesis, I used the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus), a species with both ARTs and an accessory gland, to experimentally investigate the role of the accessory gland in sperm competition and uncover how this organ may differ between ARTs. Over a two-year period, I studied tactic-specific investment in the accessory gland in fish from the beaches of British Columbia. I also examined the effects of seminal fluid, produced in part by the accessory gland, on sperm performance and morphology. I found that males adopting the ‘guarder’ male tactic invested more in one region (the lobules) of this organ, while males adopting the smaller ‘sneaker’ male tactic invested more the other region of the gland (the nodes). Using data collected over five years, I found that guarder males also invested more in their whole accessory glands. Additionally, I report that sperm swam faster in the presence of seminal fluid, and seminal fluid increased sperm head size in both male tactics and increased midpiece size in guarder males. These results suggest that the plainfin midshipman accessory gland may have dual functions, one of which may be to aid sperm competitive ability through enhancements in swimming speed and potentially more successful sperm morphology. Taken together, the results of my thesis improve our knowledge of the role of non-sperm components like seminal fluid and the accessory gland in sperm competition, and demonstrate how species with ARTs can have varying physiological responses to such competition. Only a handful of studies have considered the effects of seminal fluid on sperm performance. By examining sperm competition in a more biologically relevant way and incorporating the effects of a little-studied organ that impacts sperm competition, we should be able to more generally and accurately appreciate the dynamics of post-copulatory competition and fertilization. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)