The research question that I posed for this investigation is how the principles of Foucault’s governmentality can shed light on the political discourse on the achievement gaps (AGs) at the federal level. The AGs have been for some years now an actively researched phenomenon in education in the U.S. as well as in the rest of the world. Many in the education profession community, politicians, social activists, researchers and others have considered the differences in educational outcomes an indication of a grave deficiency of the educational process and even of the society at large. I began this work with a review of the educational research relevant to the above mentioned research question. Then I presented my research methodology and de- scribed how obtained my data and analyzed them both qualitatively and quantitatively. The results of the analysis were discussed in the light of federal legislation, the work of Foucault on governmentality, and the relevant literature and woven into a series of narratives. Finally, I abstracted these narratives into a model for under- standing the federal policy discourse. This model consists of an intersection of eight antitheses: (1) the rgime of discipline versus the apparatuses of security, (2) the appeal to danger versus assurances of progress or even success, (3) the acknowledgement of the association between the AGs and the “disadvantage” of the students and the disregard and even prohibition of the equalization of school funding, (4) the desire for all students to be “equal,” but they have to be dis-aggregated, the (5) injunction of research based instruction practices imposed by an ideology-driven reform policy, (6) we expect equal outcomes by using market forces, which are known to produce a diversity of results, (7) the teacher is a “highly qualified” professional, but also a functionary of the government, and finally (8) the claim to honor local control and school flexibility versus the unprecedented federalization and bureaucratization of the schools, which is a mirror of the contrast between the desire to establish apparatuses of security in schools and the means to establishing them through rgimes of discipline.

No description available.

Equity is an American ideal, one that is considered the cornerstone to good governance (Gooden, 2011). Achieving equity requires the eradication of racial disparities in opportunities and outcomes, particularly in education. Creating equitable educational experiences at community colleges is the focus of this research. The purpose of study is to examine the issue of social equity within community colleges in an effort to understand: (1) their efforts to promote student success through equity; (2) their commitment to social equity; and (3) the institutional change that is necessary to create an institutional culture that values social equity and is accountable for equitable student outcomes. Social equity is intrinsic for the promotion of student success within community colleges. The primary findings of this study are the: Leadership at the president and senior administrator level is necessary for the conceptualization and communication of an institutional vision of equity. Once leadership direction and commitment has been established, broad engagement across the institution is necessary for implementation of institutional changes needed to achieve equity. Improving student success was defined as the means for achieving equity by Round 1 Achieving the Dream colleges. It is vitally important to have the institutional research capacity that allows for analysis of student progression data, examination of achievement gaps through the disaggregation of student outcome data, evaluation of efforts implemented to improve equitable student outcomes and the overall culture of data informed decision making. Round 1 Achieving the Dream colleges are more comfortable with the “lift all boats” approach to student success versus a targeted approach based on data disaggregation and achievement gaps. To implement equity, it is important for community colleges to respond to outcome disparities on an institutional level by committing to the goal of equity. This study shows that recognizing inequity is the first step toward achieving equity. The pursuit of social equity within our public institutions and those that they serve is imperative to a nation that values democratic ideal of equality.

The shortcomings of the proportion above cut (PAC) statistic used so prominently in the educational landscape renders it a very problematic measure for making correct inferences with student test data. The limitations of PAC-based statistics are more pronounced with cross-test comparisons due to their dependency on cut-score locations. A better alternative is using mean-based statistics that can translate to parametric effect-size measures. However, these statistics as well can be problematic. When Gaussian assumptions are not met, reasonable transformations of a score scale produce non-monotonic outcomes. The present study develops a distribution-wide approach to summarize trend, gap, and gap trend (TGGT) measures. This approach counters the limitations of PAC-based measures and mean-based statistics in addition to addressing TGGT-related statistics in a manner more closely tied to both the data and questions regarding student achievement. This distribution-wide approach encompasses visual graphics such as percentile trend displays and probability-probability plots fashioned after Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve methodology. The latter is framed as the P-P plot framework that was proposed by Ho (2008) as a way to examine trends and gaps with more consideration given to questions of scale and policy decisions. The extension in this study involves three main components: (1) incorporating Bayesian inference, (2) using a multivariate structure for longitudinal data, and (3) accounting for measurement error at the individual level. The analysis is based on mathematical assessment data comprising Grade 3 to Grade 7 from a large Midwestern school district. Findings suggest that PP-based effect sizes provide a useful framework to measure aggregate test score change and achievement gaps. The distribution-wide perspective adds insight by examining both visually and numerically how trends and gaps are affected throughout the score distribution. Two notable findings using the PP-based effect sizes were (1) achievement gaps were very similar between the Focal and Audit test, and (2) trend measures were significantly larger for the Audit test. Additionally, measurement error corrections using the multivariate Bayesian CTT approach had effect sizes disattenuated from those based on observed scores. Also, the ordinal-based effect size statistics were generally larger than their parametric-based counterparts, and this disattenuation was practically equivalent to that seen by accounting for measurement error. Finally, the rank-based estimator of P(X>Y) via estimated true scores had smaller standard errors than for its parametric-based counterpart.

In order to close the achievement gaps between traditionally underserved groups and their peers, institutions of higher education must make developmental education a priority by implementing college-wide strategies inside and outside the classroom to help underprepared students succeed. Since community colleges offer educational opportunities to anyone seeking to further their education, and hence serve the majority of underprepared college students, it is difficult to overstate the importance of assessing and strengthening the quality of educational practices for developmental students at these institutions. Assessing the extent to which underprepared college students are actively engaged in meaningful educational experiences, and the relationship between engagement and student outcomes, will help college leaders and policymakers implement research proven engagement strategies to help a population of students that has been historically underserved attain academic success and reap the societal and economic benefits of higher education. Relationships between engagement and three critical outcomes for underprepared college students were investigated: developmental sequence completion, subsequent college-level course performance, and attainment. Similar to studies conducted on the four-year sector, the present study found similar effects of engagement on developmental students attending community colleges. While generally having a positive effect on outcomes, engagement has been proven to have compensatory effects for students which have been typically underserved including minority, nontraditional age, and first-generation students. The present study found that the impact of engagement varies according to student characteristics and level of developmental course need and subject area. Further, the study suggests that certain types of engagement can have greater influence on students which characteristically are least likely to earn a college degree. / text

Student mobility and its relationship to academic success have been researched since World War II with varied findings (Goebel, 1978). Establishing the relationship between mobility and achievement is difficult due to the fact that mobility is related to many factors. Mobility has been found to be prevalent among students who traditionally demonstrate achievement gaps (specifically students of low-income status) (Long, 1992; Smith, Fien & Paine, 2008). Mobility’s relationship to achievement is complex. Led by a single definition of mobility, admittance to more than one school in the given district over the period of one academic year, this research study sought to determine the effect of mobility on academic achievement. Specifically, the research focused on mobility’s effect on students classified as low-income and the effect of school mobility level on academic achievement of its students. This study used a quantitative design; student records were obtained for mobility data, and criterion referenced test scores in mathematics and language arts were utilized to measure academic achievement. Findings revealed that mobile students performed below non-mobile students, low-income status affected mobile students negatively, and mobility level of the school attended had a negative effect on the academic achievement of its students.

The "achievement gap" is a common term in Texas public education, often referring to academic differences in achievement among student ethnic groups within the core curriculum. Seldom is Foreign Language referenced in, nor even considered relevant to such discussions in addressing the achievement gaps that exist in our public schools, although Foreign Language holds significant influence on both students' high school and post-secondary academic trajectories. Throughout the state of Texas, it has been found that African American students are not progressing in foreign language study at the same rate and length as Hispanic, White, and Asian students; these stark achievement gaps appear to be going unmentioned, unnoticed, and/or unaddressed. This interpretive case study examined the perceptions of foreign language teachers, counselors, and administrators at a central Texas high school campus through a critical lens, regarding why they felt African American students are not progressing in foreign language courses, as compared to other student ethnic groups. Data collection for this qualitative study included individual interviews, focus group sessions, field notes, documents, and school records. For data analysis, the study employed the constant comparative method. Four general themes emerged from interviews and focus group sessions with stakeholders. These themes included deficit views, racial erasure, paralogical beliefs and behaviors, and organizational constraints, which described obstacles standing in the way of creating an equitable campus for all students. This study offers implications for educational policy, practice, and future research. For policy, Texas high school graduation requirements for foreign language should be increased and accountability measures for student learning in foreign languages should be instated. For practice, the high school should commit itself to ongoing, yearlong staff development to address equity traps at the campus. Practice should also include student performance data in foreign languages to help guide discussions about achievement gaps with African Americans and other student ethnic groups. Implications for future research include the need to examine the transferability of this study's findings to public middle school and high school campuses in Texas. Future studies should also investigate the equity trap avoidance and employment of the gaze in the context of public high school foreign language courses.

This dissertation explored the academic growth in mathematics of a longitudinal cohort of 21,567 Oregon students during middle school on a state accountability test. The student test scores were used to calculate estimates of school performance based on four different accountability models (percent proficient [PP], change in PP, multilevel growth, and growth mixture). On average, 72% of Oregon eighth graders were proficient in mathematics in 2012, 71% in the average school, and 6% more students in this cohort demonstrated mathematics proficiency compared to 2011. The two-level unconditional multilevel growth model estimated the average intercept (Grade 6) to be 228.4 (SE = 0.07) scale score points with an average middle school growth rate of 5.40 scale points per year (SE = 0.02) on the state mathematics test. Student demographic characteristics were a statistically significant improvement on the unconditional model. A major shortcoming of this research, however, was the inability to find successful model convergence for any three-level growth model or any growth mixture model. A latent class growth analysis was used to uncover groups of students who shared common growth trajectories. A five-latent class solution best represented the data with the lowest BIC and a significant LMR p. Two of the latent classes were students who had high achievement in Grade 6 and demonstrated high growth across middle school and a second group with low sixth grade achievement that had below average growth in middle school. Student-level demographic predictors had statistically significant relations with growth characteristics and latent class membership. In comparing school performance based on the four different models, it was found that, although statistically correlated, the models of school performance ranked schools differently. A school’s percentage of proficient students in Grade 8 correlated moderately (r = [.60, .70]) with growth over the middle school years as estimated by the growth and LCGA models. About 70% to 80% of schools ranked more than 10 percentiles differently for every pairwise comparison of models. These results, like previous research call into question whether currently used models of school performance produce consistent and valid descriptions of school performance using state test scores.

No description available.

The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of mentors regarding the impact of a school-based mentoring program and to identify which research-based best practices were used to achieve these impacts. School accountability measures have brought many changes to education. Since the implementation of No Child Left Behind there has been focused attention on student performance on standardized state testing. To ensure that every student met grade level content standards, schools have implemented collaborative planning through professional learning communities to improve instructional practices, regular meetings to track student performance data, and an increased focus on teacher and school leader evaluations to name a few. Despite the positive impacts of all these efforts, there are still gaps in the academic performance levels of identified student reporting groups. To eliminate these achievement gaps, many school leaders are implementing school-based mentoring programs to help meet the socio-emotional needs of their students. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used for this study. The researcher gathered quantitative data from a survey developed in a previous study which sought to "unpack how mentoring has its documented, beneficial effects and to refine understanding of best practice" (Tolan, McDaniel, Richardson, Arkin, Augenstern, and Dubois, 2020, p. 2104). The survey was used to identify the practices used by a school-based mentoring program. These survey data were supported by qualitative data collected during semi-structured recorded interviews. The interviews were used to discover the perceptions of the mentors on the impacts of the mentoring program as well as the practices used by the program. The two types of data were used to compare the findings from one another. The findings of this study demonstrated the mentor's fierce belief in the effectiveness of the program. The mentor's shared that they help students develop the ability to advocate for themselves. This finding contrasted with the existing research which discussed mentor's advocating for the mentee. The mentor's felt one of the impacts was helping student to identify and manage the emotions they dealt with in their daily lives. Finally, the mentor's shared that the mentoring program helped students develop prosocial behaviors such as empathy, social problem solving, and cooperation. / Doctor of Education / School leaders are dedicated professionals who work tirelessly to ensure that teachers are prepared to meet the needs of every student. Over the last twenty years there has been renewed attention on school accountability measures from both the state and federal governments. Despite these well-intentioned efforts and the incredible efforts of school leaders there remains significant gaps in the performance of students from the identified reporting groups; such as racial categories, students from low-income households, students with disabilities, and English Language learners. School leaders continue to search for additional resources to help meet the needs of these students. These efforts have led many school leaders to implement school-based mentoring programs. This mixed-methods study sought to identify the perceptions of mentors on the impacts of a school-based mentoring program, as well as which practices were used to achieve these impacts, in a diverse school division in central Virginia. Quantitative data was collected through a survey which sought to determine the practices used by the school-based mentoring program and whether they aligned with the research-based best practice identified in a study by Tolan et al. (2020). Qualitative data was gathered through semi-structured interviews to uncover the perceptions of the mentors on the impacts of the program and to confirm the use of research-based best practices. These two data sets were compared to confirm the findings. The study found that the school-based mentoring program taught students to effectively advocate for themselves. This contrasted with the research-based best practices identified by Tolan et al. (2020) which called for mentors to advocate for students. A second finding was that one of the impacts identified by mentors was that the mentoring program helped students develop empathy, social problem-solving skills, and cooperation. The third finding was that the mentors taught students to identify, name, and then develop the skills necessary to manage the emotions students were struggling with in their lives. Mentors perceived that these skills built upon one another leading students to develop healthy relationships with both peers and school personnel, ultimately leading to increased academic engagement and performance.