Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2002. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2002. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.

Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are an important subsistence and cash crop for smallholder farmers in Southern Africa. They require well drained light textured soils. However, most light textured soils are acidic and inherently infertile, and therefore require supplementary nutrients and amelioration with lime. In addition to application of a basal fertilizer, groundnut production also requires Ca. This increases the inputs required to produce the crop, particularly for smallholder farmers. The study examined two options for smallholder farmers, outside the classical lime application, for ameliorating soil acidity, i.e., evaluating the response of different groundnut genotypes for tolerance to soil acidity and low-cost liming alternatives. Initially ten groundnuts genotypes were screened for tolerance to soil acidity. Following this, three genotypes classified as tolerant and susceptible were used to evaluate the effect of high acid saturation on germination, emergence and seedling establishment. Thereafter, selected cultivars were used to compare calcium silicate, as an alternative to dolomitic lime, for ameliorating soil acidity and supplying calcium to developing pods. All three studies were conducted under controlled conditions: 25 ± 5°C and 20 ± 3°C day/night temperatures, 65% RH. Results measured as plant height, leaf area, yield, concentration and uptake of selected macro-and micro-nutrients showed that different groundnut genotypes differed in their response to soil acidity. Genotypes like Billy, Selmani, Rambo and JL 24 had low Al uptake and high Ca and P uptake and were classified as tolerant to acidity. In addition, these genotypes also had a higher leaf area and high number of nodules compared with Anel, Harts, Sellie, RG 784 and Robbie. With the exception of JL 24 all other tolerant genotypes (Billy, Selmani and Rambo) were large seeded. In the early establishment stage especially, root development was susceptible to soil acidity, but Rambo appeared to perform better than Jasper and Harts. Calcium silicate reduced soil acid saturation and provided enough calcium for pod development, suggesting that it may be used as an additional source of calcium. Soil acidity increased grain protein concentration and reduced its oil content, however, amelioration with either lime source reversed this trend. Thus, growing groundnuts in acid soils has implications for the commercial value of the product in terms of oil or protein supply. Overall, the study suggests that a combination of application of a cheap liming source like calcium silicate and growing tolerant cultivars, like Rambo, Billy and JL 24 might provide a window of opportunity for smallholder farmers to produce groundnuts possibly with only a fraction of the costs associated with ameliorating soil acidity. / Thesis (M.Sc.Agric.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2011.

Breeding maize (Zea mays L.) for tolerance to acidic soils could improve maize yields. The current study aims to identify maize genotypes with tolerance to acidic soils, as well as identifying secondary traits associated with the tolerance to soil acidity. Ten maize varieties were screened for tolerance to aluminium (Al) toxicity under glasshouse, laboratory and field conditions. In the glasshouse, two soil acidity levels (limed and unlimed soil) were used and the experiment was set up in a complete randomised design (CRD) with three replications. The experiment lasted for 10 days and measurements were taken on plant height (PH), leaf area, stem diameter and dry matter. In the laboratory, a haematoxylin staining (HS) experiment was conducted to determine the response of 10 maize varieties to Al toxicity. Two Al concentrations (0 and 222 μM) were used and the experiment was set up in a completely randomized design with three replications. After 7 days, shoot length, was recorded. Five stress tolerance indices were estimated to determine the resilience of each genotype. A root growth stress tolerance index was also computed for both experimental procedures. In the field, two trials were established at two sites, namely Mbinja and Mpumaze. Limed and unlimed plots were used, and the trial was set up in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Maize kernel yield and other standard field parameters were recorded. Selection of tolerant genotypes from the field screening was also done using three indices, namely harmonic mean (HM), stress tolerance index (STI) and stress susceptibility index (SSI). Both the glasshouse and laboratory assays identified similar genotypes of maize as being tolerant. These tolerant genotypes were Ngoyi, PANBG3492 BT, PAN 6Q408 and PHB 3442 based on the root growth stress tolerance index (RGSTI). It was therefore demonstrated that these two assays produced the same level of efficiency in identifying tolerant genotypes using this index. Based on ranking of seedling vigour index under soil acidity stress, the top three genotypes at Mpumaze were PHB32W71, PAN6616 and Sahara while at Mbinja, the top three were PAN6616, PAN6Q408 CB and PAN6P110. The genotypes PANBG3492 BT, PAN6Q408 and PHB3442 were also found to be tolerant to acidic soils at seedling stage. These genotypes are recommended for further evaluation in more sites to confirm their tolerance and yield potential under acidic soils. The study also revealed that plant height, leaf area and stem diameter could be used for indirect selection for tolerance to Al toxicity under glasshouse conditions. The seedling vigour index was also effective in identifying tolerant genotypes under glasshouse conditions. On the other hand, shoot length stress tolerance index and the haematoxylin score were useful for indirect selection for tolerance to Al toxicity in the laboratory. In the field, it was observed that ear length, leaf area and ear diameter can be useful in identifying genotypes that are tolerant to soil acidity. They can therefore be useful as indirect selection criteria under field conditions. Additionally, the best selection indices for identifying soil acidity tolerant genotypes under field conditions were the HM and the STI. It is recommended that varieties that were identified as tolerant be further evaluated in several soil acidity hot spots to confirm their tolerance and stability of performance under field conditions. / Agriculture and  Animal Health / M. Sc. (Agriculture)