Global ETD Search

1	Exploring farmers´ motivation for collective action: A Q study on collaboration in Dutch agri-environment schemes Schneider, Margarethe 17 November 2022 (has links) Im Rahmen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik der Europäischen Union wurden Agrarumweltprogramme (AES) entwickelt, um die durch die Landwirtschaft verursachte Zerstörung der natürlichen Umwelt zu bekämpfen. Um die ökologische Wirksamkeit der Systeme zu verbessern, wird ein kollektiver Ansatz empfohlen, der sich auf eine Landschaft statt auf eine einzelne Betriebsebene konzentriert. Dieser Ansatz wird in ganz Europa selten angewendet, außer in den Niederlanden, wo seit 2016 alle AES gemeinsam realisiert werden müssen. Da die Teilnahme an den Programmen freiwillig ist, ist es von entscheidender Bedeutung, die Motivation der Landwirte zu verstehen, sich anzuschließen, da die Annahme und Umsetzung von Maßnahmen eine Voraussetzung für die Erreichung ist irgendwelche Effekte. Ziel dieser Studie ist es daher, die Motivation niederländischer Landwirte zur Teilnahme an kollektiven AES zu untersuchen und die wichtigsten Vor- und Nachteile des Programms herauszufinden, die von den Landwirten wahrgenommen werden. Eine Q-Studie mit 15 Landwirten aus sechs Provinzen zeigt drei vorherrschende Motivationsansichten: eine kollektivorientierte, eine wirtschaftsorientierte und eine umweltorientierte Perspektive. Alle Bauern eint ihre Zuneigung und Sorge für die Natur, die von unterschiedlichem Problembewusstsein und Kollektivzugehörigkeit begleitet wird. Finanzieller Ausgleich wird von allen als wichtig erachtet, jedoch eher als notwendiges Mittel, um notwendige Änderungen in der landwirtschaftlichen Praxis zu ermöglichen, denn als zusätzliche Einnahmequelle. Während die niederländischen Regelungen noch weiter verbessert werden können, um mehr Flexibilität, eine bessere Integration des Wissens der Landwirte und eine bessere Kommunikation zu ermöglichen, weisen alle Landwirte viele Vorbehalte im Zusammenhang mit kollektiven Maßnahmen zurück, was darauf hindeutet, dass der niederländische Ansatz über die nationalen Grenzen hinaus gefördert werden könnte. / Within the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy, agri-environment schemes (AES) have been designed to address the degradation of the natural environment caused by agriculture. To improve the schemes’ ecological effectiveness, a collective approach focusing on a landscape instead of a single farm level is recommended. This approach is rarely applied across Europe except for the Netherlands, where all AES have to be realised collectively since 2016. As participation in the schemes is voluntary, understanding farmers’ motivation to join is crucial since the uptake and implementation of measures is prerequisite for achieving any effects. Hence, the aim of this study is to explore Dutch farmers’ motivation to participate in collective AES and to find out about the scheme’s main advantages and disadvantages perceived by the farmers. A Q study with 15 farmers from six provinces shows three dominant motivational views: a collective-oriented, a business-oriented and an environment-oriented perspective. All farmers unites their affection and care for nature, which is accompanied by different levels of problem awareness and affiliation to the collective. Financial compensation is deemed important by all, yet rather as necessary mean to enable required changes in farming practices than as additional source of revenue. While the Dutch schemes can still be further improved to allow for more flexibility, a better integration of the farmers’ knowledge and enhanced communication, all farmers dismiss many caveats related to collective action, indicating a potential to promote the Dutch approach beyond national borders.
2	Effects of local and landscape factors on grassland plant diversity / Effekte von lokalen und regionalen Faktoren auf den Artenreichtum im Grünland Klimek, Sebastian 16 November 2006 (has links) No description available. 630 Landwirtschaft Veterinärmedizin Agricultural Sciences Agrarumweltprogramme Biodiversität Geographische Informationssysteme Grünlandbewirtschaftung Landschaftsstruktur räumliche Skala Partitionierung der Variation agri-environment schemes biodiversity geographic information system grassland management landscape structure spatial scale variation partitioning 48.16 42.44 YA 000: Land- und Forstwirtschaft YEU 300: Futterpflanzen
3	Landscape-level heterogeneity of agri-environment measures improves habitat suitability for farmland birds Roilo, Stephanie, Engler, Jan O., Václavík, Tomáš, Cord, Anna F. 21 May 2024 (has links) Agri-environment schemes (AESs), ecological focus areas (EFAs), and organic farming are the main tools of the common agricultural policy (CAP) to counteract the dramatic decline of farmland biodiversity in Europe. However, their effectiveness is repeatedly doubted because it seems to vary when measured at the field-versus-landscape level and to depend on the regional environmental and land-use context. Understanding the heterogeneity of their effectiveness is thus crucial to developing management recommendations that maximize their efficacy. Using ensemble species distribution models and spatially explicit field-level information on crops grown, farming practice (organic/conventional), and applied AES/EFA from the Integrated Administration and Control System, we investigated the contributions of five groups of measures (buffer areas, cover crops, extensive grassland management, fallow land, and organic farming) to habitat suitability for 15 farmland bird species in the Mulde River Basin, Germany. We used a multiscale approach to identify the scale of effect of the selected measures. Using simulated land-use scenarios, we further examined how breeding habitat suitability would change if the measures were completely removed and if their adoption by farmers increased to meet conservation-informed targets. Buffer areas, fallow land, and extensive grassland were beneficial measures for most species, but cover crops and organic farming had contrasting effects across species. While different measures acted at different spatial scales, our results highlight the importance of land-use management at the landscape level—at which most measures had the strongest effect. We found that the current level of adoption of the measures delivers only modest gains in breeding habitat suitability. However, habitat suitability improved for the majority of species when the implementation of the measures was increased, suggesting that they could be effective conservation tools if higher adoption levels were reached. The heterogeneity of responses across species and spatial scales indicated that a mix of different measures, applied widely across the agricultural landscape, would likely maximize the benefits for biodiversity. This can only be achieved if the measures in the future CAP will be cooperatively designed in a regionally targeted way to improve their attractiveness for farmers and widen their uptake. info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/570 ddc:570 info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333 ddc:333
4	Plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture - comparing local, landscape and regional effects / Ackerwildpflanzengesellschaften in ökologischer und konventioneller Landwirtschaft - die Bedeutung von Standort, Landschaft und Region Gabriel, Doreen 03 February 2006 (has links) No description available. 630 Landwirtschaft Veterinärmedizin Agricultural Sciences Ackerwildkräuter Ackerland Agrarumweltprogramme Beta Diversität Biodiversität Geographische Informationssysteme Getreide Landschaft Landschaftskomplexität Landschaftsökologie konventioneller Landbau ökologischer Landbau Naturschutz Insektenbestäubung räumliche Skala Samenbank Sameneinflug Unkräuter Winterweizen zeitliche Skala additive partitioning agri-environment schemes arable weeds arable crop beta diversity biodiversity cereal fields conventional farming community composition conservation functional scale geographic information system GIS insect pollination inter-annual variability landscape context landscape complexity landscape ecology organic farming seedbank seed rain spatial turnover temporal turnover Triticum aestivum winter wheat 48.16 YA

1

Page generated in 0.067 seconds