Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Canterbury, 2008. / Typescript (photocopy). "April 2008." Includes bibliographical references (p. 205-218). Also available via the World Wide Web.

Antarctic tourism represents the largest and fastest growing commercial activity on the Antarctic continent. Under consideration of its unprecedented growth and diversification, the Antarctic tourism sector is viewed with increasing scrutiny and concern. This concern is expressed in discussions surrounding the success and effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework for Antarctic tourism and asks what changes might be required to adequately protect the Antarctic continent in the future. Viewpoints and interests among Antarctic tourism operators, policy-makers, researchers and other stakeholders diverge, and Antarctic tourism is discussed as being either or both benefactor and detractor to the environmental and political integrity of Antarctica. This thesis discusses, regulations drawing on regime theory, the effectiveness of Antarctic tourism. It postulates the theory that the combined regulatory efforts of Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (ATCPs) and industry self-regulation through the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO) define the Antarctic tourism regime. Using interviews and a Delphi study as the primary methods of inquiry, stakeholder viewpoints on regulatory and operational characteristics of Antarctic tourism were collected and integrated into a discussion of the effectiveness of the current regulatory regime and an assessment of potential options for regulating Antarctic tourism in the future. The interviews provide insights particularly into operational matters and the in situ practice of tour operators and their compliance with existing regulations. The Delphi study focuses on how the current regulatory issues are addressed, how rules and regulation are enacted and whether the current regulatory framework needs improvement. The thesis research shows that Antarctic tourism stakeholders are concerned about the increasing scale and diversification of Antarctic tourism and generally subscribe to a conservation imperative when assessing potential options for the future regulation of Antarctic tourism. The Antarctic Treaty System is regarded as being stable and having matured over the years, although the regime has not been tested to any great extent. Tourism development in the Antarctic may well prove to be a first test of the stability and success of the Antarctic Treaty System. Stakeholders desire a continued strong partnership between Antarctic Treaty Parties and IAATO regarding the regulation of Antarctic tourism, but conclude that in view of the rapid development of Antarctic tourism, structural, institutional and legislative changes are necessary if Antarctic tourism regulation is to remain successful. The thesis argues that these necessary changes do not inevitably involve a complete overhaul of the existing regulatory regime for Antarctic tourism and that a new overarching regulatory instrument such as a tourism convention may neither be the most desirable nor feasible approach to regulating tourism to the Antarctic. Instead, this thesis research suggests that regulatory improvements need to build on the strengths of the current regime and on a strategic vision that should guide the future regulation of Antarctic tourism.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Open University. BLDSC no. DX209779. / 2 volumes.

Antarctic tourism represents the largest and fastest growing commercial activity on the Antarctic continent. Under consideration of its unprecedented growth and diversification, the Antarctic tourism sector is viewed with increasing scrutiny and concern. This concern is expressed in discussions surrounding the success and effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework for Antarctic tourism and asks what changes might be required to adequately protect the Antarctic continent in the future. Viewpoints and interests among Antarctic tourism operators, policy-makers, researchers and other stakeholders diverge, and Antarctic tourism is discussed as being either or both benefactor and detractor to the environmental and political integrity of Antarctica. This thesis discusses, regulations drawing on regime theory, the effectiveness of Antarctic tourism. It postulates the theory that the combined regulatory efforts of Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (ATCPs) and industry self-regulation through the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO) define the Antarctic tourism regime. Using interviews and a Delphi study as the primary methods of inquiry, stakeholder viewpoints on regulatory and operational characteristics of Antarctic tourism were collected and integrated into a discussion of the effectiveness of the current regulatory regime and an assessment of potential options for regulating Antarctic tourism in the future. The interviews provide insights particularly into operational matters and the in situ practice of tour operators and their compliance with existing regulations. The Delphi study focuses on how the current regulatory issues are addressed, how rules and regulation are enacted and whether the current regulatory framework needs improvement. The thesis research shows that Antarctic tourism stakeholders are concerned about the increasing scale and diversification of Antarctic tourism and generally subscribe to a conservation imperative when assessing potential options for the future regulation of Antarctic tourism. The Antarctic Treaty System is regarded as being stable and having matured over the years, although the regime has not been tested to any great extent. Tourism development in the Antarctic may well prove to be a first test of the stability and success of the Antarctic Treaty System. Stakeholders desire a continued strong partnership between Antarctic Treaty Parties and IAATO regarding the regulation of Antarctic tourism, but conclude that in view of the rapid development of Antarctic tourism, structural, institutional and legislative changes are necessary if Antarctic tourism regulation is to remain successful. The thesis argues that these necessary changes do not inevitably involve a complete overhaul of the existing regulatory regime for Antarctic tourism and that a new overarching regulatory instrument such as a tourism convention may neither be the most desirable nor feasible approach to regulating tourism to the Antarctic. Instead, this thesis research suggests that regulatory improvements need to build on the strengths of the current regime and on a strategic vision that should guide the future regulation of Antarctic tourism.

The objective of the thesis is to describe the legal regime of the Antarctic specifically in relation to the protection of its environment. The introductory chapters are devoted to brief description of the natural conditions of the Antarctic and the history of its exploration. In relation with the discovery voyages there are also mentioned the first territorial claims of the states and the legal foundations on which these claims were made. The author also deals with the basic legal document in relation to this continent, the Antarctic Treaty, mainly with its main principles as the demilitarization, prohibition of appropriation and the recognition of previous claims. Under the Antarctic Treaty several categories of the Parties to the Treaty can be distinguished which is an un-common situation. The existence of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting which is related to this situation is also being discussed. This Consultative Meeting further develops the principles of the Antarctic Treaty and issues Measures, Decisions and Resolutions. This thesis focuses on the analysis of the protection of the environment of the Antarctic. The topic has been divided into separate components of the environment and these are dealt with in individual chapters of the thesis where the steady development and the introduction...

The purpose of the diploma thesis is to describe and summarize the legal regime of Antarctica including its evolution, functioning and the protection of its environment. Chapter one of the thesis consists of the introduction with the Antarctic continent including the natural conditions, the history of the discovering, the competition between Roald Amundsen and Robert Falcon Scott to reach the South Pole and the territorial claims of seven states in the first half of the twentieth century. The second chapter deals with the fundamental document of the legal regime of Antarctica - The Antarctic Treaty. The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on 1 December 1959 by the twelve countries whose scientists had been active in and around Antarctica during the International Geophysical Year of 1957-58. The very important provisions of the Treaty contain international cooperation and prohibition of any measures of a military nature, such as the establishment of military bases and fortifications, carrying out of the military maneuvers, as well as testing of any type of weapons. Antarctica became international space which can not be appropriated by individual states. The third chapter deals with the Antarctic Treaty System and its analysis and summary. The Antarctic Treaty System regulates the international...

This thesis endeavours to address an identified gap in literature on the European Union’s (EU) scientific and political engagement in the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). The examination of this engagement begins from the initiation of the EU’s formal participation in the ATS in 1983 as a Party to the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) mechanism, through to the EU’s contemporary role in 2011, for the facilitation of European collaborative scientific research on the Antarctic continent that remains under negotiation pending decisions on funding allocations for polar research under the EU Commission’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020). Particular focus is placed on analysis into the EU’s role in global environmental discourse, for contextualised examination on the hypothesis of this research, which posits that the EU could upgrade its role in the Antarctic to further legitimise a strategic agenda for recognition as a global political actor in international relations. As most of the EU’s participation in the process of Antarctic political deliberation was afforded as an observer to the series of Special Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (SATCM XI-1 to XI-IV) which developed the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (1991), a significant amount of analysis will focus on EU and Member State involvement in the development of this Protocol. There is also a supplementary exploration of Europeanisation of French foreign policy over this period. In addition to contributing to the academic literature, recommendations concerning the future of the EU’s scientific and political Antarctic engagement could be used as informative and topical research for a mixed audience of European Union (EU) strategists, policy-makers and officials who are tasked with furthering the development of the EU into a global political actor. It could also be of interest to those people in the Antarctic community who might opportunistically seek to maximise the benefits of an increase in direct and indirect EU participation in the Antarctic, particularly the availability of EU funding for Antarctic scientific research.

The Legal regime of Antarctica, primarily the protection of its environment and the position of the Czech Republic The purpose of my thesis is to analyse a legal regime of Antarctica, with regards to protection of its environment and position of the Czech Republic. The thesis is divided into four chapters. Chapter One contains basic introduction of the Antarctic Continent, its geography and history. Chapter Two investigates legal regime constituted in Antarctica by the Antarctic Treaty and other international documents, known as the Antarctic Treaty System. This chapter consists of six parts, each concentrating on special subject. Part one examines the path of development the Antarctic treaty, part two deals with treaty itself, part three looks at dispute settlement, part four focuses on liability in this international space, part five addresses the issue of inspections held in Antarctica. Part six describes structure and organisation of the Antarctic Treaty System, Antartic Treaty Consultative Meetings, its legal documents and Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Chapter Three concentrates on the problem of protection of antarctic environment. Firts part of this chapter focuses on protection of living resources, guaranteed by the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals and the...

A prospecção biológica (i.e. bioprospecção) é uma atividade, relativamente recente, que ocorre de forma desregulada na região austral, área de vigência do Sistema do Tratado da Antártida (STA). A normatização desta atividade no âmbito do STA é o principal tema em discussão na agenda do Regime Antártico. Este Regime Internacional, constituído pelo Tratado Antártico (de 1959), pela Convenção para Preservação das Focas Antárticas (de 1972), pela Convenção para Conservação dos Recursos Vivos Marinhos Antárticos (de 1980) e pelo Protocolo de Proteção Ambiental do Tratado da Antártida (de 1991), tem cumprido, ao longo de sua história, a missão de preservar a região austral e ordenar as atividades antárticas. Os Estados que o integram, enfrentam os novos desafios, criando instrumentos jurídicos para regulamentar atividades específicas. Todavia, eles encontram dificuldades de repetir este comportamento com relação à bioprospeccão. A razão disso é a complexidade desta atividade, associada à problemática da região austral, uma área sem soberanias reconhecidas. Existe imensa dificuldade de desenvolver uma legislação para contemplar diferentes interesses nacionais, disputas entre empresas e organizações ambientalistas, razões de ordem comercial e desacordos entre os interesses de pesquisa científica e do mercado, respeitando as normas e os princípios formalizados no Tratado Antártico. A bioprospecção na Antártida é um problema cuja solução, provavelmente, demandará longas e difíceis negociações. / Biological prospecting (i.e. bioprospecting) is a relatively recent activity that occurs unregulated in the austral region, area covered by the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). The normatization of this activity is the main subject being discussed in the agenda of the Antarctic Regime. This International Regime, comprised by the Antarctic Treaty (1959), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Seals (1972), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (1980) and the Madrid Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty (1991), fulfills the mission to preserve the austral region and regulate international relations with respect to Antarctica. The nation-states, participants in this regime, have a tendency to face new challenges, by creating aditional agreements to regulate specific activities. Bioprospecting, however, has proven dificult to regulate. This is due to the complexity of the activity and the ambiguous territorial status of Antarctica. It is dificult to develop legislation that satifies interests of nation-states, private companies, environmental NGO’s, scientists and universities, while respecting norms and principles formalized in the Antarctic Treaty. Bioprospecting in Antarctica, therefore, is a problem that demands carefull and thoughtfull considerations, yet to be resolved.

Esta tese aborda a definição de um projeto estratégico-científico brasileiro para a Antártida, a partir da análise da evolução da geopolítica do Sistema do Tratado Antártico (STA). A questão antártica, conforme esta tese, se fundamenta em dois pressupostos teóricos antagônicos das relações internacionais, o realismo e o liberalismo. As premissas de cooperação científica e de uso pacífico da região, estabelecidos no Tratado da Antártida (1959), determinaram a discussão do objeto de estudo a partir de uma epistemologia liberal. A geopolítica antártica, neste início do século XXI, pende para uma dialética científico-ambiental, em detrimento da dimensão econômico–territorialista que dominou o discurso para a região austral até o emblemático ano de 1991, quando ocorreu a ratificação do Protocolo sobre Proteção Ambiental do Tratado da Antártida (Protocolo de Madri). Se o século XX foi marcado pelo advento da ciência antártica, representado pelo Ano Geofísico Internacional (1957 - 1958), o presente século se caracteriza, até o momento, como aquele em que essa ciência antártica deverá construir sua própria agenda. Os Estados-signatários, cada vez mais, reconhecem o peso político de uma ciência antártica de excelência dentro do STA. Com a instituição do Programa Antártico Brasileiro (PROANTAR), em 1982, o país passou a defender seus substanciais interesses naquela região, que, em um primeiro momento, estavam subordinados às contingências da Guerra Fria e ao Projeto do Brasil-potência. Todavia, a invocação subjetiva de tais interesses não permitiu que se delimitasse a sua real amplitude. Esse posicionamento geopolítico em relação à Antártida começou a ser referenciado a partir de 2011, quando a questão antártica, através da elaboração de um Planejamento Estratégico para o PROANTAR (2012 - 2022), passou a assumir uma relativa importância estratégica para o país; em outras palavras, o programa aproximou-se de um projeto de Estado. No referido planejamento encontram-se as diretrizes que deverão garantir ao Brasil um status político relevante dentro do STA, o que implica numa participação efetiva do país nas decisões sobre o destino daquela região. A diretriz principal desse processo é a inserção do país no seleto grupo de Estados-signatários que desenvolve pesquisas de ponta na Antártida. Ao Entender a importância estratégico-geopolítica da Antártida para o Brasil, e o protagonismo da ciência na política do STA, esta tese propõe novos desafios e paradigmas à ciência antártica brasileira, apoiando o atual Planejamento Estratégico para o PROANTAR (2012 - 2022) e o mais recente Plano de Ação para a Ciência Antártica (2013 - 2018). Assim, analisar o PROANTAR a partir da definição de um projeto estratégico-científico, e suas repercussões geopolíticas, é o objetivo maior desta tese, implicando nas seguintes metas: uma análise sobre a geopolítica antártica, o que determinou uma discussão preliminar sobre os pressupostos geopolíticos do Tratado e da ciência antártica, a partir de uma perspectiva histórica; uma análise sobre as dimensões da geopolítica da região no limiar do século XXI, identificando o ano de 1991 (ratificação do Protocolo de Madri) como o momento de inflexão do STA, no qual a dimensão científico-ambiental começou a adquirir maior relevância geopolítica; uma análise sobre a questão antártica no pensamento geopolítico brasileiro, que permitiu discorrer sobre a construção de um possível imaginário territorialista antártico, assim como a sua repercussão na dimensão científica do PROANTAR. Por fim, se analisa os novos desafios à ciência antártica brasileira no século XXI: a expansão geográfica das pesquisas do PROANTAR naquele continente, em especial as investigações no interior do manto de gelo antártico, que quebra o paradigma de uma ciência periférica, historicamente restrita à região da Península Antártica; e a instituição de uma política capaz de garantir a qualidade da produção científica, através de um adequado apoio logístico-financeiro. Vencer tais desafios é de importância fundamental para a inclusão da pesquisa antártica brasileira nas chamadas fronteiras emergentes da ciência. Todavia, à medida que se analisa as ações político-científicas, convergentes à definição de um projeto estratégico brasileiro para a Antártida, que vêm sendo implementadas desde o início deste século, mais nítida se tornam as contradições e os obstáculos à definição de tal projeto: os entraves burocráticos e a volatilidade das ações políticas, que, somados a falta de reconhecimento da importância (geo)política de uma ciência antártica de vanguarda, em particular por grande parte dos pesquisadores que atuam no PROANTAR, impedem a instituição de uma política científica e a definição de um projeto estratégico-científico para a região. / This thesis addresses the definition of a Brazilian strategic-scientific project for Antarctica from the analysis of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) geopolitical evolution. The Antarctic question, as discussed in this thesis, is based in two antagonistic theoretical premises taken from the foreign relations (realism and liberalism). The premises of scientific collaboration and the pacific use of the region, established in the Antarctic Treaty (1959), determined a discussion of this topic using a liberal epistemology. The Antarctic geopolitics at the beginning of the 21st century leans towards a scientific-environmental dialectics, to the detriment of the economical-territorial dimension that dominated the discourse for the Austral region up to the emblematic year of 1991, when the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Madrid Protocol) was ratified. If the 20th century was marked by the arrival of the Antarctic science, represented by the International Geophysical Year (1957-1958), the current century is characterized, so far, as the one in which the Antarctic science should build its own agenda. The Signatory-States increasingly recognize the political weight of an Antarctic science of excellence within the ATS. By establishing the Brazilian Antarctic Program (PROANTAR, from the Portuguese Programa Antártico Brasileiro) in 1982, Brazil started to defend of its substantial interests in the Antarctic region. These interests, at first, were subordinated to the Cold War contingencies and the Brazil-potency Project. However, the subjective invocation of such interests did not allow the delimitation of its real extent. This geopolitical positioning in relation to Antarctica was first mentioned in 2011 when the Antarctic question, through the preparation of a Strategic Planning for PROANTAR (2012 - 2022), acquired a relative strategic importance for the country. In other words, the program became closer to a project of State. This plan contains directives that shall grant a relevant political status to Brazil within the ATS, which implies the effective participation of the country in the decisions about the fate of the region. The integration of the country into the select group of signatory States that develop cutting-edge research in Antarctica is the main directive of this plan. By understanding the strategic-geopolitical importance of Antarctica to Brazil, and the role of science in the ATS politics, this thesis proposes new challenges and paradigms to the Brazilian Antarctic science, supporting to the current Strategic Planning for PROANTAR (2012 - 2022) and the most recent Action Plan for the Antarctic Science (2013 - 2018). Thus, the analysis of PROANTAR from the perspective of the definition of a strategic-scientific project and its geopolitical repercussions are the main objetives of this thesis, which are reflected in the following goals: an analysis of the Antarctic geopolitics, which determined a preliminary discussion regarding the geopolitical premises of the Treaty and the Antarctic science from a historical perspective; an analysis of the geopolitical dimensions of the region at the benning of the 21st century, identifying the year 1991 (ratification of the Madrid Protocol) as the ATS turning point, when the scientific-environmental dimension began to acquired a greater geopolitical relevance; an analysis of the Antarctic question in the Brazilian geopolitical line of thought, which allowed the discussion about the construction of a possible Antarctic territorial imaginary, as well as its repercussion on the scientific dimension of PROANTAR. Finally, we analyze the new challenges to the Brazilian Antarctic science in the 21st century: the geographic expansion of the PROANTAR research in that continent, especially the investigations into the Antarctic ice sheet, breaking the paradigm of a peripheral science that has been historically confined to the Antarctic Peninsula region; and the institution of a policy that guarantees the quality of the scientific production through an adequate logistic-financial support. Overcoming such challenges is paramount for the inclusion of the Brazilian Antarctic research in the so-called emerging frontiers of science. Nonetheless, as we analyze the political-scientific actions, converging to the definition of a Brazilian strategic project for Antarctic, which has been implemented since the beginning of the century, it becomes clearer the contradictions and obstacles to the definition of such project become: the bureaucratic hindrances and the volatile political actions, which in addition to the lack of recognition of the (geo)political relevance of a cutting-edge Antarctic science, especially by a large part of the scientific community working at PROANTAR, prevent the institution of a the scientific politicy and the definition of a strategic-scientific project for the region.